[POLL] AK and other weapon customization — Tournament History

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!

Multiple choice Public votes Closed 2015-08-12

This poll is closed.

Allow combining moderation duties with membership in the Arbitration Committee

69.4% 34 votes

Prohibit combining moderation duties with membership in the Arbitration Committee

22.4% 11 votes

1 person is making changes to the ХВ rules

8.2% 4 votes

AK makes changes to the rules for Hv

46.9% 23 votes

Changes to the rules of Heroes & Might & Magic will be made after a general vote

38.8% 19 votes

The rules for official Tournaments are determined by their organizer

36.7% 18 votes

The rules for official Tournaments are part of the ХВ rules

57.1% 28 votes

Leave restart on block

63.3% 31 votes

Remove restart on block

32.7% 16 votes

You can start digging for the Grail from week 6

32.7% 16 votes

You can start digging for the Grail on week 1

63.3% 31 votes

First
Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Next
Last

In reply to Wicc

Statistics

Registered: 1/4/2012 3:32 PM UTC

Posts: 2,066

7/30/2015 2:22 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Wicc

A bore :cool:

I noticed this typo right away, but unfortunately, editing the starting post doesn't allow editing the options in the poll.

Therefore, "from the 5th week" should be read as "from the 6th week".

Well, if anything, I'm in favor of digging for the Grail starting from 141.

ICQ 423164784

In reply to Wicc

Statistics

Registered: 4/29/2007 10:30 AM UTC

Posts: 11,704

7/30/2015 3:17 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Wicc

Therefore, "starting from the 5th week" should be read as "starting from the 6th week."

Let's make a note of that.

In reply to scorp

Statistics

Registered: 10/16/2007 6:22 AM UTC

Posts: 3,358

7/30/2015 7:34 PM UTC

Auto-translated

scorp

Vik does so much good that you can both praise and criticize him:cool:

ahaha) not bad :D and I somehow..., (well, I'm sorry), didn't think of that at all :D :D

In general, now I'll also start creating polls to create the illusion of general dissatisfaction :D Few people will resist clicking on a poll. Thank you, Dau, you are the creator of all our polls. After all, we care about the game. And there are already 2 candidates who are interfering. We need to work in this direction |

I will continue to watch how one person tries to "logically" impose his opinion on the majority. This is a challenge :D
Great changes are coming!
And no more pathetic psychological warfare :D.

Although, okay, it's just nonsense, that's exactly it, I'm not myself.

Сейчас балуюсь этим https://vcmi.eu/download/
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того

Statistics

Registered: 11/27/2007 1:22 PM UTC

Posts: 5,092

7/30/2015 7:56 PM UTC

Auto-translated

I read the post, I read the caption, it's idyllic :)

Statistics

Registered: 6/9/2014 12:12 PM UTC

Posts: 1,117

7/31/2015 6:40 AM UTC

Auto-translated

Regarding the Grail — if it is allowed to be dug up starting from day 111, but the Grail building in a town can only be constructed from a later date — for example, day 137/147, specifically on the seventh day, because it increases creature growth. With a ban on building the Grail in Tower and Conflux, or alternatively, using HeroesWorld rules to remove the map exploration bonus and the bonus of revealing all spells for these towns. Or, slightly reduce the imbalanced nature of the bonuses — for example, the Grail in Conflux works like a Library in Tower and additionally reveals 1 spell of each level. The Grail in Tower — reveals all snow zones on the map or snow + grassland.

UTC+03:00, icq 593626431

Statistics

Registered: 4/7/2013 7:43 PM UTC

Posts: 1,323

7/31/2015 7:43 AM UTC

Auto-translated

Regarding such polls, which in theory can influence important aspects of the rules or the internal principles of the forum. In my opinion, in such polls, in addition to the answer options for a particular question, there should be a field similar to "against all," in our case, it could be formulated in the range from "utter nonsense" to "the poll is meaningless," "the poll is not legitimate," "the poll is not relevant," and so on, using more official and softer wording. This is needed for two things: 1. It will immediately become clear whether the poll is interesting and whether it contains meaningful content, or whether it was born from someone's sick imagination or internal frustration after a lost game or a lost debate. 2. This poll clearly shows that most people simply passed by and did not participate in it for one reason or another; however, those who like to click on checkboxes will always be found if there is such an opportunity. This is a well-known fact; most Media publications on the Internet always try to keep polls among visitors on their main page, and this is understandable – it's simple psychology; even in questions that a person doesn't understand, they will click a checkbox to see the opinions of others and add their important vote to the poll. However, these polls are almost always far from reality and are purely for entertainment and do not influence anything (as a clear example, one can recall the polls on sports platforms, where before the start of each season, according to users, Spartak will always become the champion, as it is sad to admit, this is not related to a real assessment of the team's strength, but to the number of fans of that team; similar examples can be given from other areas). In our case, the situation is reversed; polls usually influence many things, even despite the fact that recently, some users are trying their best to discredit them.

241-568-808

Statistics

Registered: 11/27/2007 1:22 PM UTC

Posts: 5,092

7/31/2015 7:54 AM UTC

Auto-translated

Well, not everyone shows up for presidential or parliamentary elections either. Decisions are made by the votes of those who do show up. Those who don't care — that's their own business.

As for checkmarks like "the poll is illegitimate," those are your personal fantasies. Look into the history of various votes on HeroesWorld — there have been quite a few, and everything unfolded roughly the same way as now.

In reply to Wicc

Statistics

Registered: 4/7/2013 7:43 PM UTC

Posts: 1,323

7/31/2015 8:04 AM UTC

Auto-translated

Wicc

Well, not everyone shows up for presidential/deputy elections either. Decisions are made by the votes of those who do show up. Those who don't care – that's their personal business.

The idea that "the poll is illegitimate" is just your personal fantasy. Study the history of various polls on the forums; there have been many, and they all proceeded roughly as they do now.

So, according to your logic, any poll, with any number of participants, is legitimate? That is, a poll with answer options can be taken as a basis and considered a formed opinion? Anticipating your next trolling, that your answer options are comprehensive – they are so only in your opinion.
I don't want to participate in this poll (or in Daou's polls) not because I "don't care," but because they are simply absurd in my opinion, and that's why such an option is needed.
If, in your opinion, your poll is the pinnacle, reflecting all the questions that have long been brewing among the majority, this option will definitely not harm the topic.
I am seriously suggesting that the moderators consider implementing such an option in all polls, and polls created without this option should be moved to the "tribune" or closed.

241-568-808

Statistics

Registered: 12/5/2009 9:15 AM UTC

Posts: 2,069

7/31/2015 8:09 AM UTC

The_ +1

Statistics

Registered: 11/1/2011 4:49 AM UTC

Posts: 1,085

7/31/2015 8:52 AM UTC

The_ +1

ICQ601845540

Как сделать так, чтобы в подписи картинка рейтинга была кликабельной?

Statistics

Registered: 11/27/2007 1:22 PM UTC

Posts: 5,092

7/31/2015 8:59 AM UTC

Auto-translated

All opinions are needed, and all opinions are important.

There are 3 votes against the legitimacy of the poll. I will include this in the final report.

I agree that some similar option should have been added. In the future, I will try to do so. For now, we will write about it in text on the forum.

Statistics

Registered: 10/30/2008 9:23 PM UTC

Posts: 3,652

7/31/2015 9:38 AM UTC

Auto-translated

I once suggested introducing a kind of "minimum approval rating" for polls, say 33% (this is negotiable). For example, you propose an idea that you think is good and decide to create a poll, but it turns out that your idea isn't as great as you thought, and the forum doesn't support it, and you don't reach the desired 33% of votes. In this case, it's no longer a poll but rather spam, and spam should be punished in some way (also negotiable). This way, we can rid the forum of unnecessary polls, and those who still decide to create them will first ask people in ICQ/private messages whether it's even needed.

296524052
Весна 2012.

In reply to злой_романтик

Statistics

Registered: 11/27/2007 1:22 PM UTC

Posts: 5,092

7/31/2015 9:52 AM UTC

Auto-translated

evil_romantic

I once suggested introducing some kind of "minimum threshold for polls," say 33% (this is negotiable). For example, you come up with an idea that seems good to you and decide to create a poll. But it turns out that your idea isn't as great as you thought, and the forum doesn't support it, and you don't get the desired 33% of the votes. In this case, it's no longer a poll, but rather spam, and there should be some kind of penalty for spam (also negotiable). This way, we can rid the forum of unnecessary polls, and anyone who decides to create them will first ask people in ICQ/private messages whether they even need them.

They just want to complain and throw mud...

I conduct this poll in an exemplary manner: first, I created a topic for discussion, presented a list of questions, waited for everyone who wanted to express their opinion, discarded irrelevant questions (on which there was a unanimous opinion), and then put the rest to a vote. In my opinion, all such votes should be conducted in this way.

And, judging by the distribution of votes, I guessed right; there is a significant spread of votes on all points.

P.S. Currently, all 5 points meet the 33% criterion.

In reply to Wicc

Statistics

Registered: 10/30/2008 9:23 PM UTC

Posts: 3,652

7/31/2015 10:06 AM UTC

Auto-translated

Wicc

It seems like all they do is complain and throw mud...

I'm conducting this poll in an exemplary manner – first, I created a discussion thread, presented a list of questions, waited for everyone to express their opinions, discarded irrelevant questions (where there was unanimous agreement), and then put the remaining questions to a vote. In my opinion, all such polls should be conducted in this way.

And, judging by the distribution of votes, I guessed correctly; there is a significant spread of votes on all points.

P.S. The 33% criterion is currently met by all 5 points.

Is the pot calling the kettle black? ;) Actually, I wasn't referring specifically to your poll, but to the rules for conducting polls in general; there aren't any right now, which, in my opinion, is wrong. The person creating the poll should be responsible for their creation.

In your poll, I was particularly impressed by the spread of votes for the Down-Za options on all points :D

296524052
Весна 2012.