I have no idea. What makes the CIS so special? At the last two CIS events, they seemed to play strictly by HeroesWorld rules, didn’t they?
Added after 1 minute
The messages are being posted quickly here — I think the vote was started too early
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
I have no idea. What makes the CIS so special? At the last two CIS events, they seemed to play strictly by HeroesWorld rules, didn’t they?
The basis of banning the Grail - less card revealing, or is it currently impossible; if not, then it can be done unconditionally
the speed at which messages are typed here - I think the voting was organized too early
Decisions are made by a simple majority of votes.
Because here, it's a democracy. At least, that's how most players and organizers present it. I operate within this social model. If I'm wrong, well, okay, I'll learn from it.
It's normal for HeroesWorld - just casually discussing with those who are somewhat interested, but when there's a vote, many become filled with a sense of importance about the moment.
Horses, men, all mixed together...
...
if the majority picks points 3 or 4, does that completely nullify points 8, 9, 10, and 11? After all, if one person (in our case, Pit) or the AK is responsible for the rules, then what difference does it make how the majority voted?
so, what will be the final decision regarding "re per block" if it remains?
if the majority choose options 3 or 4, will this completely invalidate options 8, 9, 10, and 11? Because if one person (in our case, Pete) or the AC is responsible for the rules, what difference will it make how the majority voted?
It's not for nothing that he was taken into AC, he caught Vic
Vic, why did you give yourself away like that?
Вик, why did you blow your cover like that?
I wasn't even fishing—it's lying on the surface, and besides, before this poll, it was worth creating another poll: is it permissible to change the rules of HeroesWorld by a simple majority vote?
[/U] Then it won't be a solution, but a public opinion poll, which, as practice shows, both Pete and the Arbitration Committee pay attention to. That's not bad either.
It seems you're smoking something...
What 3 things are you referring to, and what did they express? Even if they did express something, what's the problem?
The poll regarding your suggestion is the topic you're in – points 3, 4, and 5.
My children, please calm down. Vic and Romantic – just play a game of Russian roulette: one will remain, the other will die. Vic is trying to push through his ideas, and Romantic is willing to sacrifice everything to discredit the vote.
Of all the things mentioned, I believe that focusing on the Grail is the most important.
Regarding combining membership and moderation – I voted against it because no one should overwork themselves. Let's keep flies and cutlets separate.
Changes to the rules – naturally, a vote is needed. But not a universal one. Instead, with higher criteria for participation.
Remove the re-post rule – first, eliminate the programmatic blocks, and then remove the rule.
Rules for official Tournaments... Tournaments are official for a reason...