Posts from Restructuring of the Academy.

As far as I understand, there are simply no streams at the moment. !

Got hooked?! :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool: :D :D :D
heroes3.tv - tons of streams daily!

It reminds me of a violation of the law.

Please provide a direct, working link to a game in M-200% format with commentary on the entire gameplay (i.e., both players) from the last two years.
Thank you in advance.

http://twitch.tv/Twaryna
http://twitch.tv/redwhait
You can find it in the video here; there are recordings of recent M-200% formats.
These are the finalists of the current M-200%.

Please provide a DIRECT and WORKING link to a game replay in M-200% format with commentary on the entire gameplay (i.e., for BOTH players) from the last two years.
Thank you in advance.

Something like what Sticky used to do.

Why do you think someone, something, should do something for you, especially after you write in all caps with a bunch of exclamation marks?
Dark gave you links; you seem to have hands, so go find it yourself. Also, the M200 finals will be held today at 19:00 Moscow time, according to those links.

Regarding the topic: Vik, Cobra, Sanin, Scorpion, Nitro + the current Dirty and Mizrael.

Dark gave you the links, and you seem to have hands, so find it yourself. Also, today at 7 PM Moscow time, there will be the final of M200.

Oh, sorry, Mr. Qwerty, we were a little late :smile39:

Absolutely fantastic player, indeed :smile12:

The election campaign is somehow going rather dull...

But there were times...

after the decision is made, there is a list of who voted how

It is also necessary to create a separate closed thread in which the decisions of the Arbitration Committee will be recorded to avoid controversial interpretations of the rules. For example, Dirty neutrally expressed his opinion on the use of the bug with the Admiral's hat, and the other members of the Arbitration Committee did not know about this, which led to the cancellation of Redwait's game result against Nitro.

Now it's clear where Peterius got the habit of dividing the forum into "ours" and "the opposition" :)
It's noteworthy that one of the main complaints in the old arguments concerned the publicity and openness of the Arbitration Committee, and it seems that nothing has changed since then. The way the decision is communicated is such that "we have decided," but you have to figure out for yourselves why we decided that way. I think many arguments could have been avoided if the reasoning behind the decision was included immediately, ideally with a reference to a specific clause in the rules/tournament regulations/a similar decision in the past, and, if necessary, additional comments on the interpretation of the rule in this particular situation. And it would be perfectly acceptable if

And it would also be good not to lose this idea; it's strange that there isn't an archive of decisions yet.