Restructuring of the Academy.

The election campaign is somehow going rather dull...

But there were times...

Now it's clear where Peterius got the habit of dividing the forum into "ours" and "the opposition" :)
It is noteworthy that one of the main complaints in the old arguments concerned the publicity and openness of the Arbitration Committee, and it seems that nothing has changed since then. The way the decision is communicated is such that "we have decided," and why we decided that way – you figure it out yourself. It seems to me that many arguments could have been avoided if the reasoning behind the decision was provided immediately, ideally with a reference to a specific clause of the rules/tournament regulations/a similar decision in the past, and, if necessary, additional comments on the interpretation of the rule in this particular situation. And it would be quite acceptable if

after the decision is made, there is a list of who voted how

And it would also be good not to lose this idea; it's strange that there is still no archive of decisions.

It is also necessary to create a separate closed thread in which the decisions of the Arbitration Committee will be recorded to avoid controversial interpretations of the rules. For example, Dirty neutrally expressed his opinion on the use of the bug with the Admiral's hat, and the other members of the Arbitration Committee did not know about this, which led to the cancellation of Redwait's game result against Nitro.