Auto-translated
I see that some people don't understand the situation... Unfortunately, there are too few options in the poll, so it's impossible to properly separate the opinions: "I personally don't want restructuring, but those who want it can vote and play" and "I'm against even having an option for restructuring, because it will lead to attempts to push it into official Tournaments."
Personally, I'm in favor of option 2, meaning I believe that the restructuring functionality shouldn't even be created as an option.
Here's the situation: there's Vasya, who only plays SoD, and nothing but SoD. He has every right to do so, because his personal desire is a necessary and sufficient condition; he doesn't have to justify it, he just wants to and that's it. And since it's boring to play alone, he participates in Tournaments, of which there are about 15 a year.
In theory, Vasya doesn't mind if someone plays with restructuring. After all, some people play Dota, some people are into other things, everyone has their own preferences, and it's difficult and unproductive to forbid it.
But in practice, attempting to introduce restructuring will lead to Vasya's favorite Tournaments being taken away from him. First, opponents will start persuading him: "Come on, let's play with restructuring...", he'll have to fend off each one, then they'll put up a poll: "Maybe we should play Favorites with restructuring?", and then some organizer will say: "Now Favorites is played with restructuring, those who don't agree can not sign up." That's it...
Therefore, if you want to introduce something new, you need to:
1) Call it something else, not SoD, but at least SoD++, and make it clear that it's a mod of SoD, not the classic version.
2) Don't interfere with SoD (in official Tournaments), stand aside, create your own Tournaments like "SoD++ Tasting" and so on.
This will also allow you to introduce not only restructuring, but also other things that are being suggested (troop experience, for example :smile04:).