Skip to content

Posts from REWORK for the Academy. Is it needed or not?

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Closed
SoD. Rework for Mage Guild. Is it needed or not?
92 voters
Single choice Public votes Closed 2015-06-09
This poll is closed.
Of course, it’s needed
39.1% 36 votes
No, it’s not needed at all
60.9% 56 votes
In reply to kalababa
User Avatar
Auto-translated
kalababa
You don't need to be a chef to say that the food is terrible.

Absolutely. But at least once in your life, you need to try this food; otherwise, the person saying it's terrible is just talking nonsense. So, this example doesn't hold up.
http://ru.twitch.tv/lizard_wt
In reply to Heroin_HP
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Heroin_HP
He stated it bluntly. Cobra is already planning the restructuring, and Peterius is already planning to hold Tournaments. Aren't you taking on too much? Well, at least Cobra held a vote, where his idea is currently being rejected, but Peter, where are you going to hold these Tournaments?

LOL! 40% ARE VOTING FOR THIS?? Two years ago, I wouldn't have expected even 20% of the votes! And what does this say? It says that the average skill level of players has increased significantly, and people understand that control is needed on the late game stage by BOTH players! Or at least a guaranteed chance of obtaining it (this provides comfort in a difficult/challenging situation).
When I first started the poll, my primary goal was to gauge public opinion; at that time, I wasn't sure if the restructuring was something people wanted, but the support in this thread gave me confidence! The idea should be implemented in one form or another. We are ready to discuss the implementation to ensure it satisfies all players, but in a constructive manner!

If I haven't convinced you, the next post will be about a quality team, consisting of those who voted FOR. It's probably logical that their votes will carry slightly more weight than those who have 0 posts and voted AGAINST.
)))))

P.S. But I wouldn't want to resort to personal attacks


In reply to KobRa_RR
User Avatar
Auto-translated
KobRa_RR
LOL! 40% voted FOR this? Two years ago, I wouldn't have expected even 20%! What does this say? It shows that the average skill level of players has significantly increased, and people understand that in Hero League, both players need control in the late game! Or at least a guaranteed chance of getting it (this provides comfort in a difficult/bad situation).
When I started the poll, my primary goal was to gauge public opinion; at the time, I wasn't sure if people wanted the change, but the support in this thread gave me confidence! The idea should be implemented in one form or another. We are ready to discuss the implementation to ensure it satisfies all players, but in a constructive manner!

If I haven't convinced you, my next post will be about the quality of the players who voted FOR. It seems logical that their votes should carry slightly more weight than those who voted AGAINST and have 0 posts.
)))))

P.S. But I don't want to resort to personal attacks.
Well, in your opinion, this isn't a vote, it's just something you don't care about. Or do you only see who voted FOR? I don't know how that's possible; that is, those who voted AGAINST are just not in the know yet. But the topic will still be discussed, even if the voting results don't support it! So, tell me, where are you right?
In reply to KobRa_RR
User Avatar
Auto-translated
KobRa_RR
If I haven't convinced you, my next post will be about a quality roster, featuring those who voted FOR. It seems logical that their votes should carry slightly more weight than those who have 0 posts and voted AGAINST.
Any significant changes to the rules are made through voting. And everyone who wants to can vote, as far as I remember. When did we start having "chosen ones" whose votes should carry more weight?
No one can stop you from creating a checkbox. It's your personal business. Conducting your own tournaments, if you decide to take it on, is also not prohibited. The main thing is that there are organizers and people who want to participate, and there will definitely be plenty of them.
But please, don't decide for everyone what and how things should be in official tournaments.

Added 5 minutes later
Piterius
But seriously, I think it's enough to argue, create a checkbox, and run a couple of trial Tournaments over the year; it will show. And then, after those who participated in these Tournaments, conduct a vote, but not among trolls and those who haven't tried, IMHO.
The same as above, create a checkbox, create your own Tournaments. After a year, create a vote. If people are drawn to the changes, that's good; if not, that's also good; time will tell. But there's no need to divide votes into "chosen ones" whose votes are counted and "just came along" whose votes are not counted. There's no need to divide players into two categories; we all play the same game.
Мой ник Heroes, и никто не вынесет меня
Скажу я вам, мои друзья.
Я некромант, я маг великий, и армия моя
Непобедимая, огромная!
In reply to KobRa_RR
User Avatar
Auto-translated
KobRa_RR


If I haven't convinced you, my next post will be about a quality roster, featuring those who voted FOR. It's probably logical that their votes should carry slightly more weight than those who have 0 posts and voted AGAINST.
)))))
Aiwe, Alone, AYMAN, BISHOP, bRitvo4kA, злой_романтик, Dark, Dirty_Player, Falcone, Grizvald, HellLighT, Heroin_HP, kalababa, Kilgor, Maretti, Pit for LM, rebellious, Stryfe, The_, twaryna, Wicc,

The players who voted against are, in principle, mostly newcomers and not members of the AC:cool: :smile20: :smile20:

лето 2012.
In reply to Dark
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Dark
Aiwe, Alone, AYMAN, BISHOP, bRitvo4kA, злой_романтик, Dark, Dirty_Player, Falcone, Grizvald, HellLighT, Heroin_HP, kalababa, Kilgor, Maretti, Pit for LM, rebellious, Stryfe, The_, twaryna, Wicc,

Players who voted against it are, in principle, mostly casual players and not members of the Administration Committee:cool: :smile20: :smile20:

Total: 21 people

=Lizard=, =Stinger=, Amiloo, BA/IEHOK, Browser, FireToSky, Gomunguls, Javdet, Juristis, KobRa_RR, LeBron, LuckyF, Medium_HP, MrP1nchy, Satyr, Ominous1, Piterius, Player_, Redwhait HP, Sanin, Scorpiona, Simon5760, theShevanesian, u2noob, Vatya, (sorry if I included or didn't include someone, I didn't want to come to this)

Total: 25 people

And you think these aren't players, just passersby??! )))
And their opinion shouldn't be taken into account?


In reply to Heroes13
User Avatar
Auto-translated
I see that some people don't understand the situation... Unfortunately, there are too few options in the poll, so it's impossible to properly separate the opinions: "I personally don't want restructuring, but those who want it can vote and play" and "I'm against even having an option for restructuring, because it will lead to attempts to push it into official Tournaments." Personally, I'm in favor of option 2, meaning I believe that the restructuring functionality shouldn't even be created as an option. Here's the situation: there's Vasya, who only plays SoD, and nothing but SoD. He has every right to do so, because his personal desire is a necessary and sufficient condition; he doesn't have to justify it, he just wants to and that's it. And since it's boring to play alone, he participates in Tournaments, of which there are about 15 a year. In theory, Vasya doesn't mind if someone plays with restructuring. After all, some people play Dota, some people are into other things, everyone has their own preferences, and it's difficult and unproductive to forbid it. But in practice, attempting to introduce restructuring will lead to Vasya's favorite Tournaments being taken away from him. First, opponents will start persuading him: "Come on, let's play with restructuring...", he'll have to fend off each one, then they'll put up a poll: "Maybe we should play Favorites with restructuring?", and then some organizer will say: "Now Favorites is played with restructuring, those who don't agree can not sign up." That's it... Therefore, if you want to introduce something new, you need to: 1) Call it something else, not SoD, but at least SoD++, and make it clear that it's a mod of SoD, not the classic version. 2) Don't interfere with SoD (in official Tournaments), stand aside, create your own Tournaments like "SoD++ Tasting" and so on. This will also allow you to introduce not only restructuring, but also other things that are being suggested (troop experience, for example :smile04:).
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Enough with trying to prove to each other who is cooler and more authoritative!)

Instead, outline and explain all the pros, cons, and nuances of the restructuring. Many don't even understand what they were voting for, whether for or against.

And I'm sure that many haven't even encountered unpleasant situations while playing SOD, when you try and spend a lot of effort, nerves, and time on building, sometimes you get what you want, but the GM takes it away and gets what you were working on, sweating like an elephant. It's even more annoying if some random player takes a village or castle with a Town Portal.
But with this, you build, you get it, you rebuild, and you feel better.

Added after 4 minutes
Wicc

1) Call it something else, not SOD, but at least SOD++, and indicate that this is a SOD mod, not a classic one.
2) Don't interfere with SOD (in official tournaments), stand aside, create your own tournaments "SOD++ Tasting" and so on.

:smile01:
Всё будет хорошо!!! Только неизвестно когда... НО ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО БУДЕТ!!!
Но!...
Слушай всех, прислушивайся к немногим, решай сам...

In reply to Heroes13
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Heroes13
Any significant changes to the rules are made by voting. And everyone who wants to can vote, as far as I remember. When did we start having "chosen ones" whose vote should carry more weight?
No one can stop you from creating a checkbox. It's your personal business. Conducting your own tournaments, if you decide to take it on, is also not prohibited. The main thing is that there are organizers and people who want to participate, and there will definitely be plenty of them.
But please, don't decide for everyone what and how things should be in official tournaments.

Great, well, let's create some clones now and hold a vote so that IT IS EXACTLY what YOU like. ))))
Each host DECIDES FOR HIMSELF according to what rules his tournament will be played. We have a democracy - you can sign up if you want, or you can not. I sign up for everything.)
Heroes13

Added 5 minutes ago
The same as above, create a checkbox, create your own tournaments. In a year, create a vote. If people are drawn to the changes, that's good, if not, that's also good, time will tell. But there is no need to divide the votes into "chosen ones" whose votes are counted, and "just some random people" whose votes are not counted. There is no need to divide the players into two categories, we are all playing the same game.

I agree, we shouldn't, but I wasn't the first to start publishing lists.))
What I don't want most of all is for any kind of Schism to occur, which is why I suggest we come to a peaceful agreement, but my opponents don't listen to me :smile32:


Auto-translated
I don't understand one thing: if you've already made up your mind and decided that you need a revamp, then just implement it and play. I don't see the problem. Why keep rehashing the same topic over and over again if you've already made up your mind?
Когда рестартов не осталось, обязательно ждите Гурниссона без балисты:D

Комплимент который сделал мой день:
Катя ЭПИК барышня) вы бы видели как пялились на её сиськи молодёж) я та с девушкой был) но всё равно пялился ) потому что хорошие) (с) Browser

Слабая раздача, которую заиграл исключительно из-за колпака на 111. (с) Сатир

In reply to Wicc
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Wicc
I see that some people don't understand the situation... unfortunately, there are too few options in the poll, so it's impossible to properly separate the opinions: "personally, I don't want restructuring, but those who want it can check the box and play" and "I'm against even having a checkbox for restructuring, because it will lead to attempts to push it into official Tournaments."

Personally, I agree with point 2, that is, I believe that the restructuring functionality shouldn't even be created as an option.

Here's the situation: there's Vasya, who only plays SoD, and nothing but SoD. He has every right to do so, because his personal desire is a necessary and sufficient condition; he doesn't have to justify it, he just wants to and that's it. And since it's boring to play alone, he participates in Tournaments, of which there are about 15 a year.

In theory, Vasya doesn't mind if someone plays with restructuring. After all, some people play Dota, some people are into other things, everyone has their own thing, and it's difficult and unproductive to forbid it.

But in practice, the attempt to introduce restructuring will lead to Vasya's favorite Tournaments being taken away from him. First, opponents will start persuading him: "come on, let's play with restructuring...", he'll have to fend off each one, then they'll put up a poll: "maybe we should play Favorites with restructuring?", and then some organizer will say: "now Favorites is played with restructuring, those who don't agree can not sign up." That's it...

Therefore, if you want to introduce something new, you need to:
1) Call it something else, not SoD, but at least SoD++, and make it clear that it's a mod of SoD, not the classic version.
2) Don't interfere with SoD (in official Tournaments), stand aside, create your own Tournaments, "SoD++ Tasting" and so on.

At the same time, this will allow not only to introduce restructuring, but also other things that are being suggested (troop experience, for example :smile04:).

AGAINST. It will be a different game, and that's not good. It's also unclear how HotA will coexist with SoD in the future, and you're suggesting creating a third game. Official Tournaments are mainly organized by Romantic, Dirty, and Pete, and they are all against restructuring. So the apologists of traditional SoD have nothing to worry about. After all, the checkbox for the second level exists and doesn't bother anyone


In reply to KobRa_RR
Auto-translated
KobRa_RR

I agree, it’s not necessary, but I didn’t start publishing the lists first.))
What I really don’t want is any kind of schism, so I suggest we come to a peaceful agreement, but my opponents aren’t listening:smile32:
but the lists were actually started by supporters of the restructuring, and they used the argument that everyone who voted against it doesn’t understand the game. Scroll through Javdet’s early posts.
Когда рестартов не осталось, обязательно ждите Гурниссона без балисты:D

Комплимент который сделал мой день:
Катя ЭПИК барышня) вы бы видели как пялились на её сиськи молодёж) я та с девушкой был) но всё равно пялился ) потому что хорошие) (с) Browser

Слабая раздача, которую заиграл исключительно из-за колпака на 111. (с) Сатир

In reply to aka.Ward3n
User Avatar
Auto-translated
aka.Ward3n
but the lists started being published by supporters of the changes, and they framed it as everyone who voted against didn't understand the game. Check out Javdet's earlier posts.

Warden, please don't take things out of context. When people provoke with all sorts of nonsense, it's hard to restrain yourself.


In reply to KobRa_RR
User Avatar
Auto-translated
KobRa_RR
What I don't want most of all is for any kind of schism to occur, which is why I suggest we come to a peaceful agreement, but my opponents aren't listening:smile32:
The opponents also want to come to a peaceful agreement. The best way to do this is to close the discussion about restructuring. But you're not listening to them:smile32:.
Official tournaments are mainly organized by Romantic, Dirty, and Pete, and they are all against restructuring. So, the apologists of traditional SOD have nothing to worry about.
Everything flows, everything changes...
In reply to KobRa_RR
User Avatar
Auto-translated
KobRa_RR
In the end, the option for a second level exists and doesn't bother anyone.
Well, then make an option for rebuilding! And the opponents will decide for themselves how to play. If it contradicts the tournament rules, then the classic version is used by default. Or as the organizers say.

Added 1 minute ago
KobRa_RR
When they provoke with all sorts of nonsense, it's sometimes hard to restrain yourself.
Just calm down! )))) Turn on your common sense! ))
Всё будет хорошо!!! Только неизвестно когда... НО ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО БУДЕТ!!!
Но!...
Слушай всех, прислушивайся к немногим, решай сам...

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: Emil