Posts from Actaea

I. Assessment of appearance and personality.
1. Excellent.
2. Good.
3. Bad.
II. Appearance and personality (continued).
4. Indifferent.
5. No.
6. No.
III. Online poll.
7. Yes.
8. Yes.
IV. Subjective assessment.
9. 0. Seriously, she would be better off going into medicine with such data; at least she would be useful.

I. Assessment of appearance and personality.
1. Normal.
2. Good.
3. Normal.
II. Appearance and personality (continued).
4. Indifferent.
5. Yes.
6. No.
III. Online poll.
7. No.
8. Yes.
IV. Subjective assessment.
9. +2. She urgently needs to join the army to get rid of all this theatrical nonsense and learn to use her knowledge of foreign languages for good.

I. Assessment of appearance and personality.
1. Good.
2. Good.
3. Bad.
II. Appearance and personality (continued).
4. Indifferent.
5. No.
6. No.
III. Online poll.
7. No.
8. No.
IV. Subjective assessment.
9. 0. Nothing but a pretty face. We don't need that.

I. Assessment of appearance and personality.
1. Normal.
2. Good.
3. Bad.
II. Appearance and personality (continued).
4. Indifferent.
5. No.
6. No.
III. Online poll.
7. No.
8. No.
IV. Subjective assessment.
9. 0. And how does she raise children and manage the household with such interests? I refuse to comment further to avoid provoking a political conflict with the Steelmen.

I. Assessment of appearance and personality.
1. Good.
2. Good.
3. Bad.
II. Appearance and personality (continued).
4. Indifferent.
5. No.
6. No.
III. Online poll.
7. Yes.
8. Yes.
IV. Subjective assessment.
9. 0. Another person who is useless to the state, unless she paints on the right topics.

I. Assessment of appearance and personality.
1. Excellent.
2. Good.
3. Normal.
II. Appearance and personality (continued).
4. Indifferent.
5. Yes.
6. No.
III. Online poll.
7. No.
8. Yes.
IV. Subjective assessment.
9. +1. The army will quickly fix her.

I. Assessment of appearance and personality.
1. Good.
2. Good.
3. Good.
II. Appearance and personality (continued).
4. Indifferent.
5. Yes.
6. Yes.
III. Online poll.
7. Yes.
8. Yes.
IV. Subjective assessment.
9. +3. I doubt she would be useful on a real battlefield, but an honorary guard is definitely better than any useless actors and artists.

I. Assessment of appearance and personality.
1. Good.
2. Good.
3. Excellent.
II. Appearance and personality (continued).
4. Indifferent.
5. Yes.
6. Yes.
III. Online poll.
7. Yes.
8. Yes.
IV. Subjective assessment.
9. +4. Smart, beautiful, it's strange that there are such people in capitalist Ventorum. Although she is too politically active, which is not good. Note for intelligence: she may agree to work for us, but proceed with caution.

I. Assessment of appearance and personality.
1. Good.
2. Good.
3. Excellent.
II. Appearance and personality (continued).
4. Indifferent.
5. Yes.
6. Yes.
III. Online poll.
7. Yes.
8. Yes.
IV. Subjective assessment.
9. +5. She has found herself in a wonderful, useful, and necessary field of activity for the state. It is very reasonable and correct on her part.

Smart, beautiful, it's even strange that there are such people in the capitalist Ventorum.

I. Assessment of appearance and personality.
1. Good.
2. Excellent.
3. Bad.
II. Appearance and personality (continued).
4. Indifferent.
5. No.
6. No.
III. Online survey.
7. No.
8. Yes.
IV. Subjective assessment.
9. 0. Can this rhymester even hold a pistol?

I. Assessment of appearance and personality.
1. Normal.
2. Good.
3. Normal.
II. Appearance and personality (continued).
4. Indifferent.
5. No.
6. No.
III. Online survey.
7. Yes.
8. Yes.
IV. Subjective assessment.
9. 0. Another actor who probably doesn't know which end of a rifle to hold. But at least he plays sports.

I. Assessment of appearance and personality.
1. Bad.
2. Bad.
3. Bad.
II. Appearance and personality (continued).
4. Indifferent.
5. No.
6. No.
III. Online survey.
7. No.
8. No.
IV. Subjective assessment.
9. +1. Unnecessary and aesthetically unpleasant person, but he is amusing.

I. Assessment of appearance and personality.
1. Bad.
2. Good.
3. Normal.
II. Appearance and personality (continued).
4. Indifferent.
5. Yes.
6. No.
III. Online survey.
7. No.
8. No.
IV. Subjective assessment.
9. +2. We need people like him, but he clearly lacks discipline.

I. Assessment of appearance and personality.
1. Good.
2. Excellent.
3. Bad.
II. Appearance and personality (continued).
4. Indifferent.
5. No.
6. No.
III. Online survey.
7. Yes.
8. Yes.
IV. Subjective assessment.
9. 0. Handsome, but completely useless young man.

I. Assessment of appearance and personality.
1. Normal.
2. Normal.
3. Bad.
II. Appearance and personality (continued).
4. Indifferent.
5. No.
6. No.
III. Online survey.
7. No.
8. Yes.
IV. Subjective assessment.
9. +1. The army will quickly correct him so that he can use his talents for the benefit of society. And take off his glasses.

I. Assessment of appearance and personality.
1. Normal.
2. Excellent.
3. Good.
II. Appearance and personality (continued).
4. Indifferent.
5. Yes.
6. No.
III. Online survey.
7. Yes.
8. Yes.
IV. Subjective assessment.
9. +3. Too bad such a person is stuck in a simple position. He shouldn't dream of movies, but of an officer's rank.

I. Assessment of appearance and personality.
1. Bad.
2. Bad.
3. Excellent.
II. Appearance and personality (continued).
4. Indifferent.
5. Yes.
6. Yes.
III. Online survey.
7. Yes.
8. No.
IV. Subjective assessment.
9. +3. An extremely intelligent man, but he shouldn't have let himself go like that.

I. Assessment of appearance and personality.
1. Normal.
2. Good.
3. Normal.
II. Appearance and personality (continued).
4. Indifferent.
5. Yes.
6. No.
III. Online survey.
7. Yes.
8. Yes.
IV. Subjective assessment.
9. +1. He's good, but too egocentric; the state won't benefit much from him as long as he only works for himself.

Etienne de Verle
1. Face - good.
2. Figure - normal.
3. How well does the contestant appeal to you based on the information you have about him? - normal.
4. Do you like the contestant's name? - indifferent.
5. Would you want this contestant to be a citizen of your country? - indifferent.
6. Could this contestant hold some government position in your country? - no.
7. Would you like to be friends with the contestant? - yes.
8. Would you like to be in a romantic relationship with the contestant? - no.
9. -1. He doesn't look like an actor, he doesn't...

Jack Page
1. Face - good.
2. Figure - normal.
3. How well does the contestant appeal to you based on the information you have about him? - good.
4. Do you like the contestant's name? - indifferent.
5. Would you want this contestant to be a citizen of your country? - yes.
6. Could this contestant hold some government position in your country? - no.
7. Would you like to be friends with the contestant? - yes.
8. Would you like to be in a romantic relationship with the contestant? - no.
9. +1. I don't know how good he is as an actor, I doubt he can play a good role in my film.

Serge Bergeron
1. Face - bad.
2. Figure - terrible.
3. How well does the contestant appeal to you based on the information you have about him? - terrible.
4. Do you like the contestant's name? - indifferent.
5. Would you want this contestant to be a citizen of your country? - no.
6. Could this contestant hold some government position in your country? - no.
7. Would you like to be friends with the contestant? - no.
8. Would you like to be in a romantic relationship with the contestant? - no.
9. -5. Are these mushrooms joking? Some kind of national humor?

Alistair Robinson
1. Face - good.
2. Figure - good.
3. How well does the contestant appeal to you based on the information you have about him? - excellent.
4. Do you like the contestant's name? - indifferent.
5. Would you want this contestant to be a citizen of your country? - yes.
6. Could this contestant hold some government position in your country? - yes.
7. Would you like to be friends with the contestant? - yes.
8. Would you like to be in a romantic relationship with the contestant? - no.
9. -1. No. He's definitely not an actor.

Gena Djormont
1. Face - terrible.
2. Figure - normal.
3. How well does the contestant appeal to you based on the information you have about him? - good.
4. Do you like the contestant's name? - indifferent.
5. Would you want this contestant to be a citizen of your country? - yes.
6. Could this contestant hold some government position in your country? - no.
7. Would you like to be friends with the contestant? - yes.
8. Would you like to be in a romantic relationship with the contestant? - no.
9. -2. Not an actor, but I wouldn't refuse such a bodyguard. You know these actors, they are always ready to argue with the director, who knows what might happen...

Andy Arahanga
1. Face - good.
2. Figure - good.
3. How well does the contestant appeal to you based on the information you have about him? - good.
4. Do you like the contestant's name? - indifferent.
5. Would you want this contestant to be a citizen of your country? - yes.
6. Could this contestant hold some government position in your country? - no.
7. Would you like to be friends with the contestant? - yes.
8. Would you like to be in a romantic relationship with the contestant? - no.
9. +1. Hmm... I don't know, maybe he could play a role...

Arthur Stammer
1. Face - bad.
2. Figure - bad.
3. How well does the contestant appeal to you based on the information you have about him? - terrible.
4. Do you like the contestant's name? - indifferent.
5. Would you want this contestant to be a citizen of your country? - no.
6. Could this contestant hold some government position in your country? - no.
7. Would you like to be friends with the contestant? - no.
8. Would you like to be in a romantic relationship with the contestant? - no.
9. -5. Damn capitalists!

Dolph
1. Face - excellent.
2. Figure - excellent.
3. How well does the contestant appeal to you based on the information you have about him? - excellent.
4. Do you like the contestant's name? - indifferent.
5. Would you want this contestant to be a citizen of your country? - yes.
6. Could this contestant hold some government position in your country? - no.
7. Would you like to be friends with the contestant? - yes.
8. Would you like to be in a romantic relationship with the contestant? - no.
9. +3. Hmm, maybe he could become an actor. Especially since it's his dream.

Mark Claudius
1. Face - normal.
2. Figure - bad.
3. How well does the contestant appeal to you based on the information you have about him? - excellent.
4. Do you like the contestant's name? - indifferent.
5. Would you want this contestant to be a citizen of your country? - yes.
6. Could this contestant hold some government position in your country? - yes.
7. Would you like to be friends with the contestant? - yes.
8. Would you like to be in a romantic relationship with the contestant? - no.
9. -1. No, he's not an actor. That's for sure.

Coby Moore
1. Face - excellent.
2. Figure - good.
3. How well does the contestant appeal to you based on the information you have about him? - excellent.
4. Do you like the contestant's name? - indifferent.
5. Would you want this contestant to be a citizen of your country? - yes.
6. Could this contestant hold some government position in your country? - no.
7. Would you like to be friends with the contestant? - yes.
8. Would you like to be in a romantic relationship with the contestant? - no.
9. -1. No, he's not an actor either.

9. -1. He doesn't look like an actor, he really doesn't...

Well, the weather improved by 35, so maybe I'll get out of the negative.

It seems to me that they tweaked something.

Well, the weather improved by 35, so maybe I'll get out of the negative.

I think they tweaked something.

Who was building the city-fortress?

Sesam allowed the church not to pay taxes - pacifism +4. ;)

#152: A Capital Idea [Hestrael; ed:Sirocco]

The Issue
A crowd of penniless ex-businessmen have amassed in @@CAPITAL@@, demanding that the government return all the nationalised industry to private control.

The Debate
1. "GREED IS GOOD!" bellows @@RANDOMNAME@@, a famous advocate of capitalism. "The economy is stagnating terribly under government control. Complete privatisation is the only option here. It's time to give power back to the people! Well, rich people, anyway..."

2. "This is outrageous!" cries armchair revolutionary @@RANDOMNAME@@. "The government must maintain the principles of equality and socialism that we fought so hard for, and not sell the country to corrupt and greedy corporations. We must eject these shameful capitalists from our great nation at once!"

3. "Hey, aren't we all being a little extreme about this?" says noted economist, @@RANDOMNAME@@. "Surely we could just keep the key industries, such as the electricity and water supplies, under government control and lessen the regulations on the others so they could function more independently? That way, the people can't complain that they are at the mercy of big business, and industries such as retail can function more effectively."

I was building. Law and order increases.

1 civil rights 79 79
2 economy 73 73
3 political freedoms 70 70
4 population 186 186
5 wealth gaps 88 88
6 unexpected death rate -17 -17
7 compassion 7 7
8 eco-friendliness 12 12
9 social conservatism 23 23
10 nudity 212 212
11 industry: automobile manufacturing 3 3
12 industry: cheese exports -1 -1
13 industry: basket weaving 2 2
14 industry: informtion technology 3 3
15 industry: pizza delivery 3 3
16 industry: trout fishing 3 3
17 industry: arms manufacturing 1 1
18 sector: agriculture 2 2
19 industry: beverage sales 0 0
20 industry: timber woodchipping 1 1
21 industry: mining -1 -1
22 industry: insurance 0 0
23 industry: furniture restoration 2 2
24 industry: retail 1 1
25 industry: book publishing 3 3
26 industry: gambling 2 2
27 sector: manufacturing 4 4
28 government size 15 15
29 welfare 14 14
30 public healthcare 22 22
31 law enforcement 14 14
32 business subsidization 31 31
33 religiousness 47 47
34 income equality 112 112
35 niceness 15 15
36 rudeness -17.4 -17.4
37 intelligence 23 23
38 stupidity 12 12
39 political apathy -1 -1
40 health 5 5
41 happiness 11 10
42 weather 33 33
43 safety from crime 26.334 26.334
44 safety 123.804 123.804
45 lifespan 17 17
46 ideological radicality 19 19
47 defense forces 28 28
48 pacifism 15 15
49 most pro-market 32 32
50 taxation 7 7
51 freedom from taxation -7 -7
52 corruption -9 -9
53 freedom from corruption 9 9
54 authoritarianism 0.079 0.079
55 youth rebelliousness -3 -3
56 culture 4 4
57 employment 76 76
58 public transport 15 15
59 industry: tourism 19.8 19.8
60 weaponization 25.665 25.665
61 recreational drug use 80 80
62 obesity -104.8 -104.8
63 godlessness -32 -32
64 environmental beauty 67.5 67.5
65 toxicity -77.969 -77.969
66 influence 9 9
67 world assembly endorsements 0 0
68 averageness 890 891
69 human development index 58 58
70 primitiveness -41 -41
71 scientific advancement 72 72

4 population 191 196
41 happiness 11 10
42 weather 33 22

great changes, right?