Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Why not remove Pandoras with magic skills higher than level 2, and limit spellbooks (KO KV KV KZ) to magic skill level 4? Since some players gather resources, while others sell them. Otherwise, those who sell resources will face difficulties later on.
And please answer my question regarding the rules here: /topic/at/788268/
Why not remove Pandoras with magic skills higher than level 2 and limit spellbooks (KO KV KV KZ) to magic skill level 4? Because some players gather resources, while others sell them. If someone sells resources, they will face difficulties later on.
DaU
I think that if there is a HotA tournament, it should be forbidden to use Sanctuaries with spells of the 4th level and scrolls of levels 4 and 5 without Mage Guild access because spells should be obtained through resources; some people sell them, and others collect them. In my opinion, scrolls of levels 4 and 5 should be completely removed, as well as Sanctuaries of level 4, and ideally, also Pandoras with magic skills higher than level 2, and spellbooks (KO KV KV KZ) should be limited to magic skill level 4.
Rating spring 2014
rating 12.07.2014
And this person ^^ non-stop talks about how to fix the balance!
Such a deep understanding of the game... But why doesn't anyone listen?
Sometimes different thoughts come to mind. And regarding the point I'll reiterate: The point is that 37% support one of my ideas (16/16+27), and those who are for it – this isn’t a small number /topic/11126/
AND WHAT’S WRONG WITH MY IDEA? It gives the impression that no one needs it.
And you are absolutely 100% right! DaU
I thought that interesting things were discussed in the forum, not that people were trying to prove their knowledge with ratings, or can you point out my mistake?
It’s not about the rating. It’s about what you’re suggesting. It’s both funny and sad at the same time. A newbie is teaching everyone “how to do it right” with his absurd ideas. And notice, I’m not focusing on the word newbie, but specifically on noob. It’s not that you came to the forum with 1 post and started teaching everyone. No. It’s about the rawness of your ideas!
He who doesn’t know, teaches
Until you win 1-2 games out of 10 against someone top-tier, like Maretti, my advice to you is to save your valuable creativity and DON’T EMBARRASS YOURSELF! Because
Regarding your 37%, I saw 29.82% in favor in your poll. Without going into your brilliant calculations. Do you think that’s a lot? First, someone will always be in favor of trying something new, and second, it will benefit someone. Third, it’s still not enough.
If you think that you are the first or the only one who had the idea to change something, welcome to the old topics. And reread everything from cover to cover. At the same time, read all the Sod vs TE and Sod vs WT arguments. So that you understand what you’re getting into. What it means to change the balance in a true Sod.
Сейчас балуюсь этим https://vcmi.eu/download/ За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
if we consider 2014 specifically, the award, in my purely personal opinion, shouldn't have gone to him. It reminds me of the 2014 Ballon d'Or, where they gave it to "RONALDO" just so it wouldn't be "MESSI" :-D
if we consider 2014 specifically, the award, in my purely personal opinion, shouldn't have gone to him. It reminds me of the 2014 Ballon d'Or, where they gave it to "RONALDO" just so it wouldn't be "MESSI" :-D
If we consider 2014 specifically, the award, in my purely personal opinion, shouldn't have gone to him. It reminds me of the 2014 Ballon d'Or, where they gave it to "RONALDO" just to avoid giving it to "MESSI" :-D
It's more like 2010, when Iniesta should have received the award, but they gave it to Messi instead.
Lil - of course, I follow KOBRA first, and then football :cool:
Added after 4 minutes skd
It's more like 2010, when Iniesta was supposed to receive the ball, but they passed it to Messi.
It's hard to compare, as they play on the same team, but in the 2010/11 season, Barcelona won the Spanish Super Cup, the Spanish Championship, and the Champions League, as far as I remember, and Messi played a more important role than Iniesta, definitely scoring a lot of goals:rolleyes:
LiL - first and foremost, you should be following the Cobra, and then football :cool:
That's what I thought :D because if you were following all the football tournaments, you would know that Messi wasn't involved, as he didn't win anything at all in 2014! And if anyone else deserved it, besides Ronaldo, it would be someone from Germany, like Manuel Neuer.