Auto-translated
Group stage tables.
Lim4
Posts from Favorites, to battle! - 7 - The Battle of Favorites! - 7
Announcement
Lim4
Auto-translated
When will the group stage end?
Regarding draw results, either they need to be allowed, in which case I would like it if a draw awarded 1 point, and a win awarded 3, or they should be officially prohibited, and even if someone later tries to arrange a draw, they should know that they are playing unfairly.
Regarding draw results, either they need to be allowed, in which case I would like it if a draw awarded 1 point, and a win awarded 3, or they should be officially prohibited, and even if someone later tries to arrange a draw, they should know that they are playing unfairly.
Dirty_Player
Auto-translated
In all competitive sports, head-to-head results are prioritized when point totals are equal.
=Lizard=
Auto-translated
Can you give examples of such disciplines? Specifically, where there is a group stage. And why exactly in all of them? In chess, they use the Buchholz system, and in football, they consider the difference between goals scored and conceded, which is again a coefficient, not a head-to-head record.
In football, almost everywhere, head-to-head records are now prioritized over the goal difference. The same applies to handball, basketball, water polo, and so on. Regarding chess, I agree – if that's our benchmark, then there are no questions. In principle, it's logical. Heroes are closer to chess than to football ;)
bubuch
Auto-translated
Thank you for playing.
Redwhait
Auto-translated
Every major tournament sparks a debate about this, and it seems like it's time to create a poll. The solution seems to be strict deadlines for each round, and in the final round, draws should only be decided by a judge's decision. Pit is too lenient; it's been a long time since everyone should have been given 0 points, or points should be awarded based on who initiated the save.
Dark30
Auto-translated
I completely agree; moreover, it should be specified in the tournament rules who should play against whom, and this should be the default setting. Indeed, there have been many more people wanting to play in recent days; there was no opportunity for 3 months, but then it appeared on the last day. The situation with the "Fortress" is really funny; the person didn't find time to play their own games, and ironically, they are still advancing. Why even participate in the tournament if there isn't time to play those 5 games in 3 months??? (of course, if someone ended up in the hospital or had other life problems, then there are no complaints).
404498871
KobRa_RR
Auto-translated
Group stages of all tournaments should be organized with a schedule for each round and results recorded after each round (as is done on Facebook), to avoid situations where one player has played all 5 matches, while another has played only one match, and can then calculate whether a draw with any of the other players is acceptable.
Exactly. Thanks to Romantic, all games are played on time, and there are no delays, even by a day, in 99.9% of cases.
Sanin
Auto-translated
In football, almost everywhere, head-to-head results are now prioritized over goals scored/conceded. As is the case in handball, basketball, water polo, etc. Regarding chess, I agree – if that's our benchmark, then there are no questions. In principle, it's logical. Heroes is closer to chess than to football ;)
Well, in that case, pre-arranged draws should be commonplace, and there would be nothing to discuss.
Exactly. Thanks to Romantic, all, absolutely all games are played on time, and there are no delays, not even by a day, in 99.9% of cases.
In this tournament, there is only one administrator – Pete for LM, and he doesn't have much time right now to answer all the questions; I think he will update the tables tomorrow.
And in general, if he doesn't have time, why not delegate authority to other members of the organizing committee? Dagr and Sam, unlike Pete, haven't disappeared; they have been responding to me. However, Sam said that he has no authority and cannot help me in any way. He can't set up tech support, he can't appoint a match administrator, he doesn't know when the round ends. It's some kind of nonsense.
P.S. Why am I the only one bothered by the lack of regulations?
ICQ 423164784
Scorpiona
Auto-translated
Group stages of all tournaments should be organized with a schedule for each round and results recorded after each round (as is done on Facebook), so that there is no situation where one player has played all 5 matches, while the second player has played only one match, and then can calculate whether a draw with any of the players is acceptable or not.
Exactly. Thanks to Roman, all games are played on time, and there are no delays, even by a day, in 99.9% of cases.
But here, thanks to Pete, some kind of chaos is happening.
It seems to me that the difference is this: Facebook is just one group, not 16 at the same time, so the workload is very different... Here, there was simply a slight overlap, so that towards the end of the tournament, the organizer was busy and couldn't focus on following up... :smile51:
469326983
KobRa_RR
Auto-translated
FB consists of 2 groups of 12 people, but here we have 16 groups of 96 people! That's 8 times more, which means we definitely need 8 responsible assistants with authority, but I think 4 people can also handle it if each takes 4 groups under their personal supervision. 64 people advance to the playoffs, so in principle, we also need a couple of people to keep things moving so that the other, more responsible people don't suffer!)
Nestor86
Auto-translated
Group stages of all tournaments should be conducted with a schedule for each round and results recorded after each round (as is done on Facebook).
Auto-translated
Why even participate in a tournament if you don't have time to play a measly 5 games in 3 months??? (of course, if someone ended up in the hospital or had other life problems, then there are no complaints).
Когда рестартов не осталось, обязательно ждите Гурниссона без балисты:D
Комплимент который сделал мой день:
Катя ЭПИК барышня) вы бы видели как пялились на её сиськи молодёж) я та с девушкой был) но всё равно пялился ) потому что хорошие) (с) Browser
Слабая раздача, которую заиграл исключительно из-за колпака на 111. (с) Сатир
Комплимент который сделал мой день:
Катя ЭПИК барышня) вы бы видели как пялились на её сиськи молодёж) я та с девушкой был) но всё равно пялился ) потому что хорошие) (с) Browser
Слабая раздача, которую заиграл исключительно из-за колпака на 111. (с) Сатир
Auto-translated
The following "favorites" need to be tested in a Swiss-system tournament "hosted by Vik"...
special_k
Auto-translated
I understand that I'm a newcomer and not even participating in the tournament. But why not make the top seed in the group responsible for running the rounds within that group? This person is usually well-respected, and everyone listens to them. And only if a very controversial situation arises should you contact the organizer.
Auto-translated
Does he even need it?