Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Everything is fine. Identity got in touch, and an ODD (One-on-One Duel) has been scheduled for the game between him and Observer.
We wanted to make a substitution because the player hadn't responded on ICQ since October, and we assumed he had given up on this tournament. And the deadline for its completion was approaching. I suggested Cobra's player, looked at the ranking list, and chose a few.
Everything has already been resolved as it should be.
Everything is fine, Identity got in touch, and they scheduled a one-on-one duel between him and Observer. We wanted to make a substitution because the player hadn't responded on ICQ since October, and we assumed he had given up on this tournament. And the deadline for its completion was approaching. I suggested Cobra as a replacement, looked at the ranking list, and chose a few players. Everything was resolved as it should have been.
The following technical results have been recorded:
Yegor Korobeynikov def. Dima Surmay (Round 2, win by default) Pupa def. SP_SkyLine (Round 2, opponent no-show) Aya def. StickyFingaz (Rounds 1 and 2, opponent no-show) Diabler def. Roger-ua (Round 2, win by default)
Thus, from Group B, the teams advancing are: 1st place – Heroin's Team, 2nd place – Inquisitors from Group C, the teams advancing are: 1st place – Chayniki, 2nd place – nUBORUBy advance over Elixir po zhizni based on additional criteria, namely: a) Head-to-head matches between the teams – the teams exchanged wins in different rounds b) Total number of wins – nUBORUBy – 11 wins, Elixir po zhizni – 10 wins including a win by default.
Group A – we await today’s continuation of play. Group D – we await the completion of play; there are 2 decisive matches remaining.
Am I correct in understanding that because the Nuborubi team played a third unnecessary game in the first round, and we were told that we didn't need to play, this decided the outcome? Gentlemen, if that's the case, why was that "X" mark put on our game? We would have played that game. It seems the organizer is to blame for us not advancing from the group, and I am filing an appeal with the Arbitration Committee.
+ to the previous speaker about the number of overall wins. darkello refused to finish the game in the 2nd round with me because he was sure that LuckyF would win, and he wouldn't have to play against me. As a result, I was given a loss.
This issue was raised in a timely manner by a passionate enthusiast, who has long argued that all games should be played, and not just skipping the third match. Those who wanted to play did so, and the cross didn't stop them.
This issue was raised in a timely manner by a cynical romantic; he had long been convincing everyone that they should play all the games, and not skip the third match. Those who wanted to play did, and the cross didn't stop them.
That's what I wanted, but they didn't want to play with me.
This issue was raised in a timely manner by a cynical romantic; he has long been urging everyone to play all the games, rather than skip the third match. Those who wanted to play did, and the cross didn't stop them.
I am not obligated to read the entire thread when the organizer has put a cross next to my name in the table – this should mean something; it's his mistake, not my problem. p.s. I see several ways to resolve the situation: either remove the selection criterion that was violated and continue according to the remaining criteria, or schedule qualifying matches as best-of-one, in my opinion.
Hmm, well, I'm in the same situation with Mar, who refused to finish the game he started in the first round, saying it's not needed and he'd rather play Skylines.
I'm curious, are there people who haven't seen the criteria for advancing to the next round:
a) Head-to-head matches between teams. b) Total number of wins. c) Head-to-head matches between team captains. d) Berger coefficient. e) Total number of wins by players who chose the game template (highlighted in blue in the tables). f) An additional match between team captains on the balance template, M - 200%, 4 minutes. g) Random draw.
In my opinion, the criteria for advancing are simply inadequate. The Berger coefficient should be the primary factor, followed by head-to-head matches, and then everything else. But changing the criteria mid-tournament?
