Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I'm curious, are there people who haven't seen the criteria for advancing to the next round:
a) Head-to-head matches between teams. b) Total number of wins. c) Head-to-head matches between team captains. d) Berger coefficient. e) Total number of wins by players who chose the game template (highlighted in blue in the tables). f) An additional match between team captains on the balance template, M - 200%, 4 minutes. g) Random draw.
In my opinion, the criteria for advancing are simply inadequate. The Berger coefficient should be the primary factor, followed by head-to-head matches, and then everything else. But changing the criteria mid-tournament?