Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Updated again, please check and add to the reports. :)
We won: 1 game against the Yolo team out of 2 1 game against the Bishop team out of 2 2 games against the Stiky team 1 game against the AUA team, the second game is being replayed
Question: how do we have 12 points in the table?
Since there are problems with the ICQ, please provide explanations right here so that everyone can correct it.
Added 1 minute ago Dirty_Player
In the Plan B team, there's a replacement: Diabler <--> Joker2k
We won 1 game against the Yolo team out of 2 1 game against the Bishop team out of 2 2 games against the Stiky team 1 game against the AUA team, the second game is being replayed
Question: how do we have 12 points in the table?
Since there are problems with the ICQ, please provide explanations right here so that everyone can correct the information
Fixed. Let's continue: check and add to the reports.
Here's how I feel about these kinds of substitutions in general. Okay, they changed one player from the second tier, which shouldn't even be in the second tier, but this substitution is just awful. Putting Buchhauser in the 3rd tier!!!! Why didn't they just swap him with Stinger? Is there anything in the regulations about the possibility of substitutions during the tournament?
I understand Bishop's situation, but he personally chose his team. If they can't reach him and they've given up, then who's to blame? IMO, it's the person who put the team together...
I would personally be against such substitutions. Okay, they replaced one player from the second tier, who shouldn't even be in the second tier, but this substitution is a complete disaster. Putting Buchhauser in the 3rd tier! Why didn't they just replace him with Stinger? Is there anything in the regulations about the possibility of substitutions during the tournament?
In the previous tournament, the captain was replaced in the team that took second place. Players are ranked, and Brauser's ranking is right in the middle of the third tier. Joker doesn't have a ranking; he was assigned based on skill, and whether this is justified will become clear later.
Bishop is certainly cunning – he managed to gather a good pool of substitutes, but according to the rules of this tournament, everything is legal. I still hope that the next "one for all" tournament will proceed without brackets and substitutions to avoid disputes. We need to take a more responsible approach to selecting single-player teams. Perhaps in the next tournament, we could even introduce 1 substitute.
In the previous tournament, the captain of the team that took second place was replaced. Players are assigned based on their ranking; Browser's ranking is roughly in the middle of the third tier. Joker doesn't have a ranking; he was assigned based on skill, and it remains to be seen how justified that is.
Why are some players assigned based on skill, and others based on ranking? If there's no ranking, they should be in the 3rd tier!!! What is this favoritism?! Based on either skill or ranking, Joker doesn't belong in the second tier! 1st or 3rd tier!!! And, in my opinion, if changes are to be made, they should be done in the "off-season"... I understand that now, the 3rd tier will be assigned an ODD match for tomorrow, Pup won't come because he has no idea about these changes, and there will be a technical win?
Added 1 minute ago злой_романтик
Bishop is certainly cunning; he managed to get some good substitutes, but according to the rules of this tournament, everything is legal. I still hope that the next "one for all" tournament will be held without tiers and substitutions to avoid disputes. We need to be more responsible when choosing teammates :) In the next tournament, we could even introduce 1 substitute.
I only see Vova and Yegor as potential substitutes.
Why are some players assigned based on skill, and others based on rating? If there's no rating, they should go into the 3rd tier!!! What's with all the familiarity?! Neither by skill nor by rating does Joker ever make it into the second tier!!!! 1 or 3!!!
Well, he doesn't have a rating, in part because the rating for the summer-autumn period hasn't been published yet. By the way, in the previous tournament, players without a rating, Coldreйн and Pent, also immediately ended up in the second tier, although neither of them finished the tournament. One turned out to be Ariputra, and the other disappeared.
upd. Joker still wouldn't have had a rating; his first game was played on December 2nd.
I would personally be against such substitutions. Okay, they replaced one player from the second tier, who shouldn't even be in the second tier, but this substitution is a complete disaster. Putting Buchhauser in the 3rd tier!!!! Why didn't they just replace him with Stinger? Is there anything in the regulations about the possibility of substitutions during the tournament?
I understand Bishop's situation, but he personally chose his team. If they can't reach them and they don't care, then who is to blame? IMO, it's the one who assembled the team...
Mr. Vatnik, please don't talk nonsense if you don't understand the situation. Otherwise, it seems like you've been asleep for 2 months and suddenly burst into the topic with wide-open eyes. Substitutions are предусмотрены by the tournament rules, we made them, sorry we didn't ask you. Next time, we will definitely ask!
The question remains open regarding technical postponements. For example, they replaced a player two days before the end of the group stage, and he asked to quickly play the matches. The opponent replied that he had his own plans for the weekend. Is this a technical postponement? Or, take the example of Diabler and Joker. Four days before the end of the group (which, if you don't mind, is 4 months!), Pekabler played 5 games!!! And now, the player who came in as a replacement four days ago wants to play 3 games? Of course, they can be played in one day, but what prevented them from being played in those 4 months? And whose fault is that?
Added 2 minutes later BISHOP
Mr. Vatnik, don't talk nonsense if you don't understand the situation. It seems like you've been asleep for 2 months and suddenly burst into the topic with wide-open eyes. The tournament allows for replacements; we made them. Sorry we didn't ask you. Next time, we will definitely ask!
I actually played all my games 2 months ago, so I have the right to rest ;) What prevented your team from doing the same, I don't know...
The question remains open regarding technical postponements. For example, they replaced a player 2 days before the end of the group stage, and he quickly agreed to play. The opponent replied that he had his own plans for the weekend. Is that a technical postponement? Or, take the example of Diabler, aka Joker. Four days before the end of the group (which, if you allow, is 4 months!), Pekabler played 5 games!!! And now, the player who came in as a replacement 4 days ago wants to play 3 games? Of course, they can play them in one day, but what prevented them from playing them in 4 months? And whose fault is that?
Added 2 minutes ago
I played all my games 2 months ago, so I have the right to rest ;) What prevented your team from doing the same, I don't know...
I'm telling you again, don't write about things you don't know or don't understand! Who told you about technical postponements or the number of games? And in any case, Vatya will be to blame :)
I personally don't understand how the browser ended up in the 3rd slot.
to bishop no offense, but 2 replacements in 2-3 days before the end of the group stage and the start of the new one... maybe I can register a new team for the tournament?:D
