Posts from Mafia: general discussions.

Hmm, I don't understand Tox's logic. He's leaving in 10 days. Recruitment for the setting doesn't happen in just one day. How will he manage? Although, if the setting is small, he might be able to.

I'm not breaking any rules; I'll be running the 99th one as well :3 But this is a fully-fledged setting that I've been preparing.
And this will be a quick and small experiment, purely for research purposes.

As promised. It's a pity there are no spoilers on the forum. I may have made some mistakes, including in the nicknames of forum members, but I hope everything is correct.
? - marks games that for some reason were not completed/ended in a draw/were played according to non-standard rules.















Interesting statistics. The Town wins almost as many times as the negatives do.

Here, the interesting part isn't so much about who won in terms of percentage, but rather how different GMs manage to achieve their results.

REVAN BRINGS DEATH TO THE CITY.
AND HE'S PLAYING ALONG WITH THE MANIACS.

(Mafia players, my dears, forgive me, in the next game you'll be stronger :3)

Revan often had two Mafia and two Wizard units, which wreaked havoc on the city, and this is reflected accordingly in the statistics.

Revan often had two Mafia and two Maniacs, who were tearing through the town like pigs, and this is reflected accordingly in the statistics.

Revan has drug-fueled newspapers written under the influence of Koshi's tea, Nepheline tobacco, and those very flowers.:D:D:D It's simply impossible to play in that town. :mad: By the way, I don't remember two Maniacs.

P.S. Koshi's last game also had two Mafia and two Maniacs. And yet, the town had a good chance until the very end. Only because of the slow-playing Mafia, the town lost.:(

In 58, there were three.

Yes, it is quite possible, but not for more than a few nights.

Haha, but in my case, the wins are distributed more or less evenly. Although, after two consecutive dry wins for the Mafia, I got scared and now approach Mafia factions in my sets with some apprehension.

It would be nice to add some kind of rage mechanic, but not the same one as the troll has, but a different one...

One that accumulates when using special abilities and is consumed if you sit idle or are blocked?

Interesting idea.

By the way, I haven't figured out the maniac's mechanics yet. I haven't even decided who the maniac will be. The city is ready, the mafia is ready, but I'm not sure who to make the maniac. Hoping for some ideas, I'll admit, I'm working on a scenario based on Eragon.

Which will accumulate when using Non-Damage spells and be spent if you sit idle/in a block?

One doesn't preclude the other; in fact, it makes things even more interesting.

Oh yeahhh it's sooo hard.. so difficult to get off one's butt and move away from mossy standards.....down with everything new. Let us grow over with moss, but we won't roll back. :rolleyes:

I like two standards: the one here and this one. The standards you proposed: blind play, chatting through the nights, inventing god knows what kind of characters are not to my liking. Why? Because
1. I am used to thinking, not chatting about nothing. In a blind game there are fewer facts and more chatter.
2. At night one must reflect on the results of the day and make decisions. Nightly chatting interferes with this.
3. I filled out my profile once and last changed it 25 games ago. And your quents have to be invented every time, as I understand it... However, if the Mage Guild posts them themselves and one only needs to choose, then it could be worth a try.

Yashchur and Kosha, you've simply amazed me with your stubbornness

I can say the same about you.;) You don't want to sleep at night. You aren't satisfied with profile clues. Etc. You are used to quents, blind games, lunatism...

down with everything new. Let us grow over with moss, but we won't roll back. :rolleyes: