Skip to content

Posts from Outlaw! Auto-translated

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Announcement
User Avatar
#1
Auto-translated
Too many rules and prohibitions, and tired of constantly following them, but "Anarchy" feels too cramped? Then this is the place for you! In this tournament, you can—and more importantly, must—play on any maps without any rules! Welcome to a world of lawlessness.
"Outlaw!"


I. Regulations and Deadlines.

Anyone may participate in the tournament who is registered on the HeroesWorld.ru forum for at least 3 months and has at least one game filed in accordance with the forum rules.
Tournament start – February 22, 2014.
The draw will take place on February 21, 2014.
Time limit per game – 2 weeks.

Tournament format - Double Elimination.
The final is played as a best-of-three with a 1:0 advantage for the winner's bracket finalist.

After the draw, a participant bracket is formed. After the 1st round, those who lose in this bracket form the 2nd play-off bracket. Subsequently, a loser from the 1st bracket enters the 2nd bracket; a loser from the 2nd bracket is eliminated from the tournament.

II. Rules and Maps.

1. Only the rule of fair play applies; everything else is permitted.
2. Game version SoD 3.2 (4.0) + HD-mod
3. The map is chosen by a standard draw from 7 maps. Blue starts drawing the map and castles (colors will be indicated in the bracket):
1) Jebus Cross
2) 2sm4d(3)
3) 8mm6a
4) 6lm10a
5) diamond
6) mini-nostalgia
7) Spider
Opponents may mutually agree to play on any other map, as well as regarding full random games.

4. Time per turn: Chess timer 24:8:1.
Starting difficulty 160%

5. Restarts – 111 + 112.
Please note that since there are no rules, technical restarts for blocks, a single road in ГО, lack of a road to the center, etc., are naturally cancelled. So use your restarts sparingly and carefully, rather than searching for chocolates.

III. Organizational Matters.

1. The tournament is unofficial.
2. The tournament is conducted according to the Rules for organization, conduct, and participation in tournaments.
3. Tournament Director - GoD (ICQ 647139286).
Tournament Judges - Dirty_Player (ICQ 408722873), Pit for LM (ICQ 471401475); Gomunguls (ICQ 499978341).
4. For every game played, participants must submit a report and confirmation.
5. Saves of all games must be kept until the end of the tournament and presented upon first request by the tournament directors or any member of the AC.
6. Disputed points, should any arise, are requested to be discussed off-forum. For resolution, you must contact the director or a tournament judge via ICQ and provide daily saves, ICQ logs, and other necessary information.
The same's decision is based primarily on the tournament rules. If the situation is not regulated by the rules, judges are guided by basic logic and gaming ethics.
7. All tournament games go into the seasonal rating. Reports and confirmations are written in this thread and will be copied to the "Online game reports and their confirmations" thread.
8. The Director has the right to make any changes to the regulations and rules during the tournament, as well as
the right to refuse participation to any player without a public explanation of reasons.
In reply to Iamsamstan
#596
Auto-translated
Iamsamstan
I don't know how right I am, but it seems to me that in the final, both should be equal, and moreover, the one who came from the losers' bracket plays one more game, and both have the same number of wins, and such a situation is a product of the double-elimination scheme, while in a Bo3 with +1 for the winner, there are still more chances to win.

But why should they be equal? The winner of the upper bracket has already, in a way, won the tournament. And, it is quite possible that he has already won against the winner of the lower bracket. The loser had the right to make a mistake; losing in the upper bracket did not deprive him of the chance to win the tournament. Reaching the grand final, the winner, having an advantage of one win, also gets the right to this mistake.

The loser must prove that his defeat was accidental. So why should they have equal chances? The winner should have an advantage.
In reply to высокий
#597
Auto-translated
high

The loser should prove that their defeat was due to chance. So why should they have equal chances? The winner should have an advantage.
Well, here, chance can also be attributed to the map layout, but that's just my opinion.
435-191-039
Discord Iamsamstan#6087
In reply to Iamsamstan
#598
Auto-translated
There are 2 options. Either play a best-of-5 series with a 1-game advantage for the winner, or play 2 best-of-3 series with a 1-series advantage for the winner. In other words, in the second option, the best-of-3 series are played starting from a score of 0-0, but the winner needs to win one best-of-3 series, while the loser needs to win 2 series.
Когда рестартов не осталось, обязательно ждите Гурниссона без балисты:D

Комплимент который сделал мой день:
Катя ЭПИК барышня) вы бы видели как пялились на её сиськи молодёж) я та с девушкой был) но всё равно пялился ) потому что хорошие) (с) Browser

Слабая раздача, которую заиграл исключительно из-за колпака на 111. (с) Сатир

In reply to aka.Ward3n
User Avatar
#600
Auto-translated
aka.Ward3n
There are 2 options. Either play a best-of-5 series with a 1-game advantage for the winner, or 2 best-of-3 series with a 1-series advantage for the winner. In other words, in the second option, the best-of-3 series are played starting from a 0-0 score, but the winner needs to win one best-of-3 series, while the loser needs to win 2 series.

Yes, you are right, I hope the organizers heard you!


In reply to aka.Ward3n
User Avatar
#601
Auto-translated
aka.Ward3n
That is, in the second version of the series, the best-of-3 matches are played starting from a score of 0-0, but the winner needs to win one best-of-3 series, while the loser needs to win two best-of-3 series.
Now it's the same, but with two best-of-1 series instead of best-of-3.
In reply to aka.Ward3n
User Avatar
#602
Auto-translated
aka.Ward3n
There are 2 options. Either play a best-of-5 series with a 1-game advantage for the winner, or 2 best-of-3 series with a 1-series advantage for the winner. That is, in the second option, the best-of-3 series are played starting from a score of 0-0, but the winner needs to win one best-of-3 series, while the loser needs to win 2 series.
You could also do it like in soccer – remove the loser's bracket and play best-of-3 in each match.
In reply to Dirty_Player
#603
Auto-translated
Dirty_Player
It's the same now, only with two Best-of-1 series instead of Best-of-3.
Two Best-of-1 series seem a bit strange.
Когда рестартов не осталось, обязательно ждите Гурниссона без балисты:D

Комплимент который сделал мой день:
Катя ЭПИК барышня) вы бы видели как пялились на её сиськи молодёж) я та с девушкой был) но всё равно пялился ) потому что хорошие) (с) Browser

Слабая раздача, которую заиграл исключительно из-за колпака на 111. (с) Сатир