Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
By the way, I was just thinking about something... Lizard, why do you want to execute the princess now, if, according to your own words, she killed the blacksmith and therefore lost the ability to kill?
I would execute Yashchur myself. We should already be at the finale, and he's here with his execution of a corpse, what a jerk. Look at him:rolleyes:
Added 4 minutes later Ple-Sen
By the way, I was thinking about something... Lizard, why do you want to execute Highness now if, according to your own words, she killed the blacksmith and therefore lost the ability to kill?
Killing the mafam is no longer necessary. They've had enough of the plague. And, if I understand correctly, someone doesn't lose the plague when killing the blacksmith.
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно. Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится. (Закон сохранения).
And no one killed the blacksmith. He just stunned him. So, it's still a question whether he lost his kill or not. And it doesn't matter anymore. Whether the kill happened or not. Now, until the end of the game, there will be a plague, considering there are no healers, and the last plague defender doesn't save.
Added 1 minute ago Ple-Sen
I also thought so, until I decided to reread the rules again:
Hmm, then let Heaven clarify this issue...
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно. Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится. (Закон сохранения).
Oh, really... This is coming from the person who "doubted" all day yesterday and came up with "alternative" theories.
P.S. I suggest hanging His Highness and depriving Morning of his ND (Non-Disclosure). :smile51:Anyway, the city's NDs don't matter anymore, so if he suddenly turns out to be a harmless guy who just confused mushrooms yesterday, it won't be a big deal.
Added 4 minutes later The only bad thing is if he turns out not to be a harmless guy, but an infected one, but still...
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно. Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится. (Закон сохранения).
Did I understand correctly that if the first rat is deprived of its special ability, both rats lose the ability to use it?
No, only one. You can only deprive the one that is using the ability. The second one doesn't have the ability as long as the first one is alive, so you can't deprive it of something it doesn't have.
I also thought so until I decided to reread the rules again.
The quote refers to the principle of operation, not the blacksmith's special ability. He deprives the ability to kill. He does not deprive the ability to infect.
Небо – мольбы не ждёт Небо – угроз не слышит Небо – ведёт особый счёт Небо – тебя найдёт
The second Neutral Dungeon doesn't exist as long as the first one is still active, so it's impossible to take away something that doesn't exist.
The question is different. If you remove the specific creature from the Neutral Dungeon that is using it, that creature loses the Neutral Dungeon, but the second Neutral Dungeon doesn't gain anything, because the first one is still active.
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно. Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится. (Закон сохранения).
Alright, if that's the case, then execute Hainess. We have evidence, and at least Yshur didn't try to cover up the body; instead, he initiated the execution.
Ple-Sen
Happy Life
