Posts from Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.
I have an idea. Introduce a yellow timer in the game – a time during which the player was thinking and didn't make a move.
You play, write a report, and mutually "express your opinions."
To avoid anything personal and without going into details, just a "3." Otherwise, there will be "post-match analyses," excuses, and clarifications. I think that if a person has this as a system, the assessment will quickly drop to around a "three."
"Сущность войны — обман. Искусный должен изображать неумелость. При готовности атаковать демонстрируй подчинение. Когда ты близок — кажись далёким, но когда ты очень далеко — притворись, будто ты рядом."
didn't make a move for 5-20 minutes
But is the idea that Vasya is busy with other things during his turn not being considered?
Here's another player, let's say Vasya Pupkin, who consistently took 5-20 minutes per turn.
Remove the checkbox that starts the timer after a turn is taken.
Ник в лоби - Kilgory
It would be simpler and would require minimal alteration of the original idea to add a section on "opponent assessment" to the game report, in addition to everything else.
We play, write a report, and mutually "express our opinions."
Complaints were received, and I suggested a solution.
H2SO4, as a way to satisfy your wish: you can easily get a yellow card; just don't confirm your report in the seasonal league for a couple more weeks and ignore requests from the organizers:
01.06.2014 Graf_Bananov (Blue, Necropolis, Galtran, Galtran) def H2SO4 (Red, Stronghold, Kreg Heg, Kreg Heg) Jebus Cross 133
Осень-Зима 2013-14.
Did you receive it? Pass it on to someone in the AK, and we'll sort it out.
[/B]
- disrespectful attitude towards the opponent, including: deliberate actions that distract the player during their turn, regular delays for the agreed-upon game time, and playing out unfinished games, unjustified interruptions of the game without warning,
^Did you receive it?
- disrespectful attitude towards the opponent, including: deliberate actions that distract the player during their turn, regular delays in starting the game at the agreed time, and continuing games, unjustified interruptions of the game without warning,
^Did you receive it?
Now I would like to clarify personally: in the complaint, there are at least 2 parties: the offended party (I don't understand who is offended: you or someone else?) and the offender. User Vasya Pupkin is not on the forum, and I haven't noticed a similar player among us. Please tell me about your problems in ICQ.
If the situation is hypothetical, let's wait until something unpleasant actually happens, and then we will solve the problems as they arise.
Осень-Зима 2013-14.
Linking them to "forum ethics" is simply stupid.
A person must follow the rules of the forum on which they are registered. Since the database system and PM system are physically tied to the forum, it is logical to also censor them. (If one really wants to).
But ICQ and Skype are not physically connected to HeroesWorld in any way. ICQ and Skype numbers can be on hundreds of other forums. Imposing any bans, moderation, or censorship would violate "human rights and freedoms."
If someone gets heated "in a conversation," they can always ignore and delete the person from their contact list. Bringing your smoke here is utter nonsense.
It's the same as if player1 saw player2 somewhere in real life and gave them a smack on the backside. And the second one complained to mommy, i.e., the Administration Council. And the Administration Council started punishing them with points, a card, and some other gibberish. Well, that's nonsense.
The same goes for chats; if someone is arguing somewhere on Twitch, or for example on SC2TV, then how is HeroesWorld involved? Who even tasked HeroesWorld with the mission of maintaining global order and controlling players outside the forum? Who gave you that right? This is nonsense.
There are laws. Of the Russian Federation, Ukraine, international law, etc. There are also relevant authorities that will accept claims for insulting "honor and dignity." They should be the ones dealing with this, not HeroesWorld, the Administration Council, the Disciplinary Council, or anything else.
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
Disqualification for violating moral and ethical norms exists in any sport.
Be mutually polite!
There are laws. Those of the Russian Federation, Ukraine, international law, etc. There are also corresponding bodies that will accept claims for insulting "honor and dignity." They should be the ones handling this, not HeroesWorld, AK, DK, or anything else.
Formally, whoever has the authority in a given area gets to set the rules there.
Only ICQ, Skype, chats from other resources, and real life fall outside the Arbitration Committee's (AC) jurisdiction.
The people making decisions on behalf of HeroesWorld (HW) in this section are the Arbitration Committee. If someone does not consider this body legitimate, they can conduct a poll, but it seems to me such people will remain in the overwhelming minority.
And as for HeroesWorld, that's beyond dispute—I never questioned that in any way.
HeroesWorld can also make decisions based on sources unrelated to HeroesWorld itself.
No. That's poking one's nose where it doesn't belong.
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
only ICQ, Skype, chats from other resources, and real-life interactions are outside the scope of the AK. This is interfering in matters that are not their concern.
These words would be justified if the AC itself read players' correspondence, rather than having it provided to them.
I want to say that the rules of the HeroesWorld cage apply within the HeroesWorld cage, but not beyond its borders.
Just because you made something up and then collectively approved it doesn't mean that's how it actually is, or should be. HeroesWorld has no right to dictate what a user writes in ICQ or Skype, because what to write there is everyone's personal business, and especially, it's not for HeroesWorld to judge what was written there. I'll leave that matter to the FSB as a last resort, but not to HeroesWorld. Anyone who doesn't like the "tone of communication in ICQ" — everyone has an ignore button.
As it is, it turns into "just provide the copies," and "the AC will sort everything out."
So maybe the AC should go pass a ruling on a cow hit by a car in a village, where the defendant was found innocent in court. Papers can be arranged. Or that the roads aren't being repaired, money is being stolen. Why not? Good deeds. This isn't far off, just a few years of evolution at this pace. For now, these examples sound absurd.
The AC was created to resolve controversial situations: maphacking, cheating, clones, in-game moments. Let it stick to that and not meddle in someone else's garden. Or is there nothing interesting left to do there? Some moral guardians you are, organizing a football match. If I, for example, express some negativity, then in ICQ I express it to someone primarily as a person, a citizen, an individual, but not as a HeroesWorld user.
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того