GMOs: beneficial or deadly? — Everything about everything. — Page 3

Auto-translated

Ment

If I see two identical boxes, one with genetically modified food and the other with the same non-modified food, I would prefer the latter.

Don't you understand that GMOs cannot be the same? They are either stronger and more resistant to natural conditions and pests, or something else. This means that less chemicals are used to process them, or maybe they are not processed with chemicals at all. Would you still choose the second one? )

I was recently digging around on Google and found a thread on the topic. I can't help but share it: http://forum.na-svyazi.ru/?showtopic=1489628&st=0

..разым двазым трызым рызым пята лата сигерь мата локом боком крюк за крюк из бульмы бульма урюк..
Знание некоторых закономерностей освобождает от изучения многих фактов.
Мечты сбываются рано или поздно, так или иначе.

Auto-translated

Don't you understand that a GMO can't be the same? It's either stronger and more resistant to natural conditions and pests, or something else. This means that less chemicals are needed to treat it, or maybe it doesn't need to be treated with chemicals at all. Would you still choose the latter?

That's a valid argument. But I'm even more afraid of chemicals than GMOs. There are some not-so-useful fertilizers, and it's also not very pleasant when citrus fruits are sometimes coated with paraffin (a very strange practice), but overall... Wash them thoroughly and eat them without worry. And if you buy food at the market, the problem is even smaller; you don't expect any tricks from fellow farmers at a farmers' market.

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram

Reading content in

Interface language

Posts from GMOs: beneficial or deadly? Auto-translated