Skip to content

Posts from registration and discussion of the upcoming online tournament for Might & Magic: Heroes Auto-translated

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
User Avatar
#46
Auto-translated
I don't care which option gets the most votes – I just want to be able to play.
In reply to alijvit
User Avatar
#47
Auto-translated
alijvit
At Kirill's request, I'm creating a poll.
We're voting on game options:
1) Alex NV's proposal
2) Numa's proposals
3) And there's another proposal!
We either draw the races or send a list of races to the judges, indicating which races players would like to play. Then, the judge decides which race each player will play (like in the "Races Confrontation" on the League), and everyone plays against everyone else.

Voting ends on June 2nd!

1. Against.
2. For.
3. Against.
In reply to Noom
User Avatar
#49
Auto-translated
1. For
2. Against
3. Against
" Дурак учится на своих ошибках, умный - на чужих, а мудрый старается их не совершать!
Пусть будет больше мудрецов и жить станет легче!!! "


Клан "ХРАНИТЕЛИ НЕБЕСНЫХ ВРАТ" Должность/Рейтинг: Мастер меча и магии/Арбалетчик
In reply to alijvit
User Avatar
#50
Auto-translated
alijvit
Let's vote for option 1!
I'm voting for Alex_nv's option. I don't understand why we can't combine both options, but never mind. Numa's option implies that in the second game, on the same map, the hiding spots will already be known, and there will be an opportunity to predict the game. Moreover, the reports may contain facts about the map. This is all not in favor of his option.
теоретик
In reply to Элементаль Бога
#51
Auto-translated
Elemental of God
Regarding Alex_nv's option. I don't understand why both options can't be combined, but that's okay. Numa's option implies that in the second game on the same map, the hiding spots will already be known, and there will be an opportunity to predict the game. Moreover, the reports may contain facts about the map. This is all not in favor of his option.

Let's say I'm streaming, and my opponent watches. What then?
In reply to alijvit
User Avatar
#52
Auto-translated
alijvit
let's say I'm streaming and my opponent watches, then what?
Another argument against the Numa option.
теоретик
User Avatar
#53
Auto-translated
For the Numa option.
#54
Auto-translated
for the first time.
In reply to Элементаль Бога
User Avatar
#55
Auto-translated
Elemental of God
I don't understand why both options can't be combined, but it's okay. Alex_nv's option implies that in the second game, players will already know the hiding spots on the map, and there will be an opportunity to predict the game. Moreover, the reports may contain facts about the map. This is all not in favor of his option.

Theorist, you don't need to write about things that weren't proposed. My option implies that NOTHING (except the starting factions) is known about the map to the players who follow the principles of fair play. I think it's pointless to defend against cheaters who peek at streams, etc., at this stage, because there is a direct opportunity to open the game save at any time.
In reply to Noom
User Avatar
#56
Auto-translated
Noom
A theorist doesn't need to write about things that weren't suggested. My version implies that the players following the principles of fair play know NOTHING (except for the starting factions) about the map. I think it's pointless to protect against cheaters who peek at streams, etc., at this stage, because there is a direct way to open the game save at any time.
We all play in tournaments and write reports about the games. The reports contain all the information about the map. Reading the report is not considered cheating.
теоретик
User Avatar
#58
Auto-translated
Okay, I'll play with you and watch your stream, no problem.
In reply to Noom
#59
Auto-translated
Noom
According to the rules of sports bridge, don't you want to launch a tournament? In my opinion, it would be at least interesting...
Tournament scheme:

For each match, a random map is generated by the judge.
A coin is tossed, and the team that wins chooses the color for which player A1 plays.
Let's say the red faction is chosen - this means that player A1 plays for the red team against B1, and player A2 plays the same map for the blue team against B2.
If the red team wins in both matches, it is considered a time rating. That is, in the match, the team that spent less time to win wins.

I meant if player B2 will be watching the game (A1 - B1) on stream.
User Avatar
#60
Auto-translated
And he's acting like he doesn't realize that the same map is being played?