Auto-translated
I don't really like them... This game doesn't live up to the Heroes series.
Posts from What is your opinion about Heroes IV?
Auto-translated
Closed
Heroes of Might and Magic IV is...
21
voters
Multiple choice
Closed
2006-02-20
This poll is closed.
A revolution in the series
28.6%
6 votes
Favorite game in the series
9.5%
2 votes
Failed experiment
52.4%
11 votes
They aren't heroes at all (what were NWC thinking?)
0%
0 votes
Just an upgrade for HoMM3
0%
0 votes
Other (please specify)
19%
4 votes
HoM[M]ie
Auto-translated
(drawbacks)
-army moves without a hero
-no unit upgrades
-low income
What’s wrong with the ability to move an army without a hero? At least you can effectively reinforce it. And the income is low because there are no upgrades:smile02: (IMHO, of course)...
But overall, yes, especially the potions are annoying:smile04:! You might as well throw them away!
aka Sir Holmes aka David Jones.
Minerva
Auto-translated
Well, I don't know... Throughout the game, I had the feeling that something was missing... And the map editor isn't that great either...
С того момента, когда человек начинает задумываться о смысле жизни, его уже можно считать больным. (З. Фрейд)
OptiMAL
Auto-translated
Well, I don't know... Throughout the game, I had the feeling that something was missing... And the map editor is just so-so...
:D
Minerva
Auto-translated
Well, there are as many opinions as there are people:) But the map editor restricts my creative freedom:) ... no, the fourth game isn't for me.
С того момента, когда человек начинает задумываться о смысле жизни, его уже можно считать больным. (З. Фрейд)
OptiMAL
Auto-translated
For example, in the fourth game (in the editor), you can make it so that your hero disappears in one place and appears in another :) I can even give you this mini-project. You can take a look at the script... It's all very simple :)
:D
AndersonAD
Auto-translated
Well, I don't know... Throughout the game, I had the feeling that something was missing... And the map editor is just so-so...
So, first try playing with it, and then decide!!!
Там где льётся свет - позже правит тьма.
Основные правила портала www.HeroesWorld.ru
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ!- сообщить о бесполезной теме/сообщении.
Основные правила портала www.HeroesWorld.ru
ФЛУДОВСКИЕ ССЫЛКИ!- сообщить о бесполезной теме/сообщении.
Zdob
Auto-translated
Random map, I agree, is the best, but it has palm trees in the snow and so on, and sometimes it's impossible to complete! :( But it's the only option! :D :cool:
HMM4 The Gathering Storm : BEST!:cool:
GvozD
Auto-translated
I don't really like them... This game doesn't deserve to be part of the Heroes series...
Personally, I quite like it. Although, of course, it has its drawbacks (which I've already described here).
Да будет так
aa340
Auto-translated
The best of the Heroes games is the fourth one!!! It's simply wonderful, a fantastic game with so many possibilities, fighting with the hero himself, amazing spells, and overall, a super game. I know that almost everyone hates it (after its release, almost everyone went back to the third game, and only a few started playing it), but I can't understand why. What's so bad about it? It's five times better than the fifth one. If, instead of the fifth game, they had released a fifth game that was exactly like the fourth, but with improved graphics, new factions, and other additions, I would be on cloud nine!!!:smile23:
Мир через силу!
Minerva
Auto-translated
The fourth installment is more visually appealing than the third (which is natural, considering the technological advancements). The map editor is also more flexible, but it didn't quite win me over. I think the idea of moving troops separately from the commanders was a bad one.
However, I really like the music in the game (especially the musical accompaniment for the landscapes and castles).
However, I really like the music in the game (especially the musical accompaniment for the landscapes and castles).
С того момента, когда человек начинает задумываться о смысле жизни, его уже можно считать больным. (З. Фрейд)
Auto-translated
GvozD
They disrupted the integrity of the series. Personally, I wasn't ready for the fact that you could level up a Paladin to level 40 and single-handedly defeat hordes of black dragons.
And I think that many of you have repeatedly created many hero-less units and then got very tangled up in them.
Add to this the lack of upgrades (THIS IS AN OUTRAGE) and a poor castle development system...
although despite this, I still play them... A paradox, however.
They disrupted the integrity of the series. Personally, I wasn't ready for the fact that you could level up a Paladin to level 40 and single-handedly defeat hordes of black dragons.
And I think that many of you have repeatedly created many hero-less units and then got very tangled up in them.
Add to this the lack of upgrades (THIS IS AN OUTRAGE) and a poor castle development system...
although despite this, I still play them... A paradox, however.
Arandor
Auto-translated
Top 3, 4, and 5!
OptiMAL
Auto-translated
GvozD
They violated the integrity of the series. Personally, I wasn't ready for the fact that you could level up a paladin to level 40 and, ALONE, take down hordes of black dragons.
And I think that many of you have repeatedly spawned many hero-less units and then very valiantly got tangled up in them.
Add to this the lack of upgrades (THIS IS AN OUTRAGE) and the poor castle development system...
although, despite this, I still play them... A paradox, however.
And the fact that an army can go without a hero is more realistic than every warrior needing the protection of a general. Soldiers can move around the map in a squad, killing neutrals, collecting resources, scouting the territory, etc. Squads are not spawned just for fun, but with a purpose. Why tear soldiers away from the army just to find out what's what?
Upgrades in the 3rd game made my head spin because they cost a lot of money. If you are fighting against a castle of the same type, it's no longer interesting. And against others too, because you know what units they have. But in the 4th game, there is variety. If you play against a castle of the same type in the 4th game, you won't guess which path the player has chosen. There is interest, and you can no longer play so confidently. Tactics, in a word. In general, I could say a lot more, but I have already stated the most important thing.:)
:D
Пандора
Auto-translated
I also disagree with Paladin Rider. It's not worth comparing Heroes 4 to the other installments, as no one claims it's a continuation of them. It's also not worth looking at Heroes 4 through the lens of Heroes 3 or 5 – in my opinion, this is a very one-sided and unproductive approach. Ultimately, it can lead to a simplistic conclusion or opinion. It would be absurd to say: "In Heroes 4, everything is different from Heroes 3! Heroes 3 is the best!". And I'm absolutely sure that with a closer look and a deeper study of the game, Heroes 4 will appeal to every fan of Heroes 3 and 5. But please, at least put in some effort and show some love for the Heroes series as a whole.
Sincerely, Pandora. Heroes
Sincerely, Pandora. Heroes