Posts from CHALLENGE The_ CHAMPIONS LEAGUE, The_'s CHALLENGE CHAMPIONS LEAGUE

If a draw wasn't beneficial to the opponents, I think they wouldn't agree to it. But if everyone is happy, what's the problem?

Does the group member agree with such outcomes if they didn't participate in the collusion?

In relation to him, this is a principle of unfair competition, because it is not a fact that LeBron and Darkello scored points with Gomungulus, and such outcomes complicate his chances of advancing from the group.

In relation to him, this is not a fair fight, as it is not certain that LeBron and Darkello scored points against Gomungulus, and such outcomes complicate his chances of advancing from the group.

They could have said they played to a draw, even though there was no game. So, what then?

When players cheat, watch their opponent's streams, or turn off their computer when losing... no one will ever know. So, what's stopping us? they argue.

Since when are cheats and agreeing to a draw the same thing?

Actually, this situation has already been discussed. There's nothing wrong with two players agreeing to a draw without playing; it's their right. If a draw suits the players based on their tournament standings, why should they play, wasting energy, time, and risking their tournament position? To avoid problems with qualifying from the group due to someone playing to a draw, you need to win yourself. IMHO.

It's the same thing because it's a deception. Either you play (act) honestly or dishonestly. If you didn't play but said you did, that's dishonest.

Actually, this situation has already been discussed. There's nothing wrong with two players agreeing to a draw without playing; it's their right. If a draw suits the players based on their tournament standings, why should they play, wasting their energy and time, and risking their tournament position? To avoid problems with qualifying from the group due to someone playing to a draw, they should win on their own. IMHO.