Posts from CHALLENGE The_ CHAMPIONS LEAGUE, The_'s CHALLENGE CHAMPIONS LEAGUE
Kairi is in the tavern, army is decent and there's enough money, let's play.
Did well on the first, built up power on the second, broke 2 Dragon Utopias on the 3rd (2+ max), have кв, all necessary skills, grabbed shackles, Dark killed my pawn, then I killed Dark.
Thanks for the game!
opp stats for 2 Dragon Utopias
23-13-13-10
my stats after 3 Dragon Utopias
9-19-9-7
not to mention that the opp stats obviously gave кв, and a CAP, and the stats aren't through a teapot! :)
oh and I almost forgot, decided to open the remaining Dragon Utopias on the map; in the eighth Dragon Utopia in order I found КЗ, in the ninth in order a CAP, I didn't find any more кв anywhere else!
thanks for the game
лето 2012.
registering
Зима 2011-12.
Thanks for the game!
P.S. Cap, in comparison to mine, had a simply fantastic respawn for money, Dragon Fly Hives, Dragon Utopias, and even relics! But there were no external dwellings of Bears and from control items only Wings and a Hat... There's the balance..in the sense of Jebus Cross))
On turn 121, I moved to the center; I had a full inventory = 49 units ;)
But it didn't help – I took all 5 Mermaids and built a level 4 Tower with a library – they didn't give me the teleport. And all the artifacts were for the Haven faction, except for the hat :(
So, I decided not to play anymore.
Thanks for the game!
Interestingly, in the Новичок tournament:
- 40 participants registered within 3 days, 32 of whom joined on the very first day, while only one required my assistance;
- everyone entered their ICQ numbers into their profiles immediately, without my vigilant supervision;
- everyone learned how to write and confirm reports correctly right away, and only 2 reports were annulled throughout the entire group stage;
- not once did we have to chase any participant, begging them to write a game report, and not one of them gave us empty promises...
registering
twaryna, you need to enter your ICQ number in your profile: /topic/at/712305/. How many times have we already told you this?
Toganash, you must confirm using the Confirm Report button, not via the Quote button; please do it correctly.
The list of tournament reports is on the first page. The link to an unconfirmed report is embedded in your opponent's nickname.
There was no Balance template initially; there was only 200%, so we play without it.
P.S. I actually wanted to add it, but someone said it already exists, and I didn't check in a hurry :peka:
The template is chosen by crossing it out from the list of 9 templates: 2SM4d(3), Balance, skirmish (on difficulty 200%), Jebus cross, Mini-Nostalgia, Diamond, 8mm6a, 6LM10a, and Spider. The player marked in blue in the table starts crossing out the template.
4. The template is chosen by crossing it out from the list of 12 templates: 2SM4d(3), Balance, skirmish, 2cm2c (on difficulty 200%), Jebus cross, Mini-Nostalgia, Diamond, 8mm6a, 6LM10a, Spider, 8xm12a, and anarchy 200%
Initially, the templates were transferred from Favorites-6. In the list of 9 templates, Balance is present on the L map, but M200 is not.
How can one conclude from this list that Balance should be played with M200?
That's most likely the case, but in this context, we have three templates from the M200 series, which are played at a difficulty of 200% according to the M200 rules.
No further changes are planned.
That's most likely the case, but in this context, we have three templates from the m200 series, which are played at 200% difficulty, following the m200 rules.
No further changes are planned.
The_, please explain.
What's the point of making аж three M200 - ultra-dispersed templates when there are only 5 templates in total, when the standard L + 130% balance has been working well for many years?
I also didn't understand the Balance thing.
The_, please explain.
What's the point of making аж three M200 - ultra-dispersed templates when there are only 5 templates in total, when the standard Balance L + 130% has been working perfectly for many years?
"my tournament - I do what I want" (C) The_
лето 2012.
That's most likely the case, but in this context, we have three templates from the m200 series, which are played at 200% difficulty, according to the m200 rules.
No further changes are planned.
That's probably the case, but in this context, we have three templates from the m200 series, which are played at 200% difficulty, according to the m200 rules.
No further changes are planned.
I think most people will be in favor; after all, 3 M200 templates are clearly an overkill.
лето 2012.
Accepted by opponent on 3/3/2014 4:57 PM
From what is written in the 2nd post, one might think that m200 is only played with 2cm2c.
I'll clarify to make it clearer.
What's the point of making аж three m200 - ultra-dispersed templates, when there are only 5 templates in total, when the standard L + 130% balance has been working well for many years?
Initially, when the templates were added, I was sure that the balance and skirmish were played at 200% in favorites, so I decided to add the L balance to this pool later. Then you wrote that the template already exists, there was no time to check it then, I took it at face value, wrote that we should add anarchy, then when the time came, I read the post with the templates again, I see the picture: balance, skirmish (at 200%), I again take it at face value that this applies to both templates, because there are no other clarifications, and the balance at 200% is more familiar than at L 130%, then I realize that I have already announced anarchy, I decide that it is no worse than the unfulfilled L balance, I am satisfied with this, I decide not to jump back and forth - this is approximately how my thought process went.
Regarding dispersion, from this list, I consider only skirmish to be a dispersive template (and many will not agree with me), the remaining two templates (2cm2c and balance) are dispersive no more and no less than, for example, 6lm10a.
I'll explain it for him.
"My tournament - I do what I want" (C) The_
Thank you for your enthusiasm, but I will always explain things myself, and putting a (C) sign without having a single fact of such a statement is, to put it mildly, incorrect.
I decided not to write right away, but still... Answering in the style: "maybe you are right, but it's not that important, it will be this way because I decided so" is undoubtedly correct from the point of view of the organizer, but this is only true when the decision is correct, when the decision is rather controversial, it doesn't look very good and the organizer's rating decreases.
Everyone understands everyone to the extent that they feel themselves.
I didn't mean to say anything like that.
Regarding whether the decision is correct or not, everything is very subjective, as are most events, everyone has their own point of view.
I will survive the decrease in rating in your eyes, as well as the increase :)
I would also like to remind you that there is always a veto for at least 5 (guest game) unwanted templates, and at most a choice of 7 templates (home game), which should negate all the problematic moments with bad templates that the organizer announced for the tournament.
Added 9 minutes ago
Maybe it's still worth changing, while the tournament is just starting? I think most people will be "for" it, after all, 3 m200 templates is clearly too much.
Ultimately, I'm not against it, because the templates were chosen based on the principle of the most common ones in all tournaments, so as not to offend anyone, because the ultimate goal of the tournament is to identify the champion among champions, in the most equal conditions.

