CHALLENGE The_ CHAMPIONS LEAGUE, The_'s CHALLENGE CHAMPIONS LEAGUE

From what is written in the 2nd post, one might think that m200 is only played with 2cm2c.

I'll clarify to make it clearer.

What's the point of making аж three m200 - ultra-dispersed templates, when there are only 5 templates in total, when the standard L + 130% balance has been working well for many years?

Initially, when the templates were added, I was sure that the balance and skirmish were played at 200% in favorites, so I decided to add the L balance to this pool later. Then you wrote that the template already exists, there was no time to check it then, I took it at face value, wrote that we should add anarchy, then when the time came, I read the post with the templates again, I see the picture: balance, skirmish (at 200%), I again take it at face value that this applies to both templates, because there are no other clarifications, and the balance at 200% is more familiar than at L 130%, then I realize that I have already announced anarchy, I decide that it is no worse than the unfulfilled L balance, I am satisfied with this, I decide not to jump back and forth - this is approximately how my thought process went.

Regarding dispersion, from this list, I consider only skirmish to be a dispersive template (and many will not agree with me), the remaining two templates (2cm2c and balance) are dispersive no more and no less than, for example, 6lm10a.

I'll explain it for him.

"My tournament - I do what I want" (C) The_

Thank you for your enthusiasm, but I will always explain things myself, and putting a (C) sign without having a single fact of such a statement is, to put it mildly, incorrect.

I decided not to write right away, but still... Answering in the style: "maybe you are right, but it's not that important, it will be this way because I decided so" is undoubtedly correct from the point of view of the organizer, but this is only true when the decision is correct, when the decision is rather controversial, it doesn't look very good and the organizer's rating decreases.

Everyone understands everyone to the extent that they feel themselves.
I didn't mean to say anything like that.
Regarding whether the decision is correct or not, everything is very subjective, as are most events, everyone has their own point of view.
I will survive the decrease in rating in your eyes, as well as the increase :)

I would also like to remind you that there is always a veto for at least 5 (guest game) unwanted templates, and at most a choice of 7 templates (home game), which should negate all the problematic moments with bad templates that the organizer announced for the tournament.

Added 9 minutes ago

Maybe it's still worth changing, while the tournament is just starting? I think most people will be "for" it, after all, 3 m200 templates is clearly too much.

It's a good idea, but it will be very difficult to understand whether the majority will be for it, many will simply not respond.
Ultimately, I'm not against it, because the templates were chosen based on the principle of the most common ones in all tournaments, so as not to offend anyone, because the ultimate goal of the tournament is to identify the champion among champions, in the most equal conditions.