Posts from Mafia 78. Battle for the Nile Auto-translated

I'm still thinking about Ment. Why isn't he a maniac?

Because my teammates already vouched for me; it's obvious.

Or maybe it's a Hospitaller?

Best regards,
Gur

Google says that the Hospitallers' cross looks a bit different, and the avatar of the Heroes player depicts a Knight

Added 1 minute ago

These should be my words. However, it can be found. Anyway, it has protection against the first execution and the first assassination attempt.

If we find it, we'll burn it for the Mafia. But for now, there's still hope for its usefulness.

I know it's different. Just a little different. The main thing is that white is on black. Not black on white, like the Teutons, but white on black. Sincerely, Gur Added after 39 seconds: Is it possible to do anything useful at night? Sincerely, Gur

Is it possible to kill someone at night, even if they are useful?

Yes, but it takes two tries.

I'm still thinking about Ment. Why isn't he a maniac?

Because either the second or the third answer is the truth. So, either he knows how to handle weapons, or he's on Ra's side.
I'd like to see a big snake throwing spears and shooting arrows )) he doesn't even have hands.

2 questions:
1) Is the healing from the Grail displayed? It's hard to understand from the rules whether only the Mafia's healing is displayed or both.
2) In the order of actions, it is separately noted that Osiris grants a bonus. If a player in the Mafia role receives this bonus, is it displayed separately?

So, is Haven like a mafia? Then tomorrow I'll complain about the balance again.

Should we eliminate Rimp to stop his whining? ^^

Okay, that's a good option.

And here’s another question that came up. We have Gor. Is his defense displayed? Because it seems natural, which is reflected in the rules, but natural defense isn’t displayed. However, there’s nothing noted about this in the order of actions.

Added 10 minutes later
Out of everything listed above, there aren’t any real arguments. Rimpel is annoying. The idea with Aphrodite doesn’t work because there are medical records there. Then there’s a clear desire to vote randomly, or not to vote at all. The latter is closer to me, but if the public wants to lynch Ment, I’ll probably join in if he doesn’t say anything interesting.
And it’s stupid to attack someone from the 3 blocked players, especially considering that Gor is displayed. Especially considering the fact that the main mafia actions have been discovered (they were healing, which is logical).

The idea with Aphrodite doesn't work because it involves medical records.

I don't really like that one either. But this one seems okay.)
Rudyy - Asparagus is quite harmful for drunkards - a kind of medical recommendation, besides, it's a quote from Remarque's "The Black Obelisk," where the main character observes patients in a mental hospital.

And here's another question that came up. We have Gor. Is his defense displayed? Because it seems like a natural defense, which is reflected in the rules, but natural defense isn't displayed. However, there's nothing noted about this in the order of actions.

Natural defense is considered to be the loss of hit points upon death, while protection is protection, if that's what the question is about.

I agree that there's no point in executing blocked players. Two mafia members are already walking around, and the other three can't do anything that's displayed.

1) Is Gor's healing displayed? The rules are difficult to understand; it's unclear whether only the Mafia's healing is displayed or both.

It is displayed.

2) The granting of Osiris's bonus is mentioned separately in the order of actions. If a player in the Mafia role receives this bonus, is it displayed separately?

Um... o_O I don't understand the question. Rephrase it in simpler terms. Isolation is displayed, and Osiris's gift – a passive ability – is always applied. However, the gift itself isn't announced; I simply state that a player has been isolated, and they figure out what to choose.

We have Gor. Is his protection displayed? It seems to be a natural protection, which is what the rules indicate, but natural protection isn't displayed. However, nothing about this is mentioned in the order of actions.

His protection is an exception among natural protections. Because he dies even when it activates. Writing something like "nothing interesting happened at night, but %player%, distinguished by %detailed description of Gor%, is considered dead and is not playing, and his killer accidentally dropped a piano" is absurd, obviously. Therefore, Gor's death is usually described. The note about natural protection is there because if he is killed with natural protection ignored, he won't be able to mess with his killer.

I was also told that if Maat is blocked, the questioned player will be able to fairly accurately determine that she was among the blockable roles, but... Maat's interview is displayed, so everyone will be able to figure that out. Unless she intentionally skips her turn, of course. In any case, I think I'll leave everything as it is; the information gained from questioning Maat while she's blocked isn't particularly valuable.

I'm talking about something else: is the defense of the Stronghold displayed as a fact?

Unless otherwise specified in the list of actions (or in the description attached to the role), the action is displayed with the target indicated. That is, guarding the Mountain should be displayed.