Posts from Forum

I heard that you shouldn't confuse a Russian person with a citizen of Russia. A Russian is a Russian! And a citizen of Russia is what you described.

If you knew history better, you would be aware that in 1937 there were serious internal power struggles within the elite, caused by both external and internal factors. In fact, most of the fears surrounding 1937 are fueled by the part of the elite that lost in those power struggles. This group made up the majority of those who were repressed.

Vatya, do you consider yourself and your entire nation as mere meat, devoid of rights?

One and a half million repressed – is that the elite?

History is the most deceitful science.

Just today, this topic has gained over 100 new posts. Sorry, but there are already over 1000 posts related to political arguments here, and I don't feel like digging through them to find links for you.

Just type "riots in London" into Yandex or Google and click on the image section.

And if he's from St. Petersburg but supports Spartak, is he no longer from St. Petersburg?

Dividing people based on national identity is only useful for political and ideological confrontation. In everyday and business communication, it's important what language a person speaks and what their cultural patterns are.

So, if a person speaks Russian and behaves like a Russian, then I perceive him as Russian, even if he's black. And this approach is very common among Russians - it has developed over centuries of living in a multinational environment. For example, the problem with guest workers from the south is not their nationality, but their boisterous behavior and clustering in diasporas, and partly their weak command of the language.

P.S. Five people died, and there are still people lamenting the unfortunate golden eagle. They should be hanged, every other one of them.
P.P.S. Rom, can you imagine such behavior from police officers in the EU? I can't. And if someone even thought of it, they would be thoroughly beaten and would never work in the police again.

A brief summary of yesterday's events. Yesterday, at 00:00, the laws of January 16th came into effect. The opposition's storming of the parliament on January 19th failed. The crowd hesitated, and to spur them on with blood, the curators of the opposition and the organizers of the coup committed a series of murders of protesters. The victims of the murders were carefully selected.

1. A resident of Dnepropetrovsk, of Armenian ethnicity, who had been at Maidan since the beginning, was killed. A sniper fired a shot to the heart in the classic "Libyan" style.
2. A protester from the Belarusian opposition was killed.
3. They were taken to the forest and Yuriy Verbytsky, a resident of Lviv, and another unidentified person were killed there. In order to convince the people of Lviv that the authorities had committed the murder, they SPECIFICALLY left a third prisoner alive - Igor Lutsenko, who said that the "titushki" and mercenaries of the authorities had captured and killed them.

All these murders are in one way or another connected to the date of January 22nd. I remind you that January 22nd is the Day of Unity of Ukraine, the day of its unification. On the eve, the leader of Ukrainian neo-Nazis, Tyagnibok, sent a black and red neo-Nazi flag to every REGIONAL CENTER, formally to celebrate January 22nd. For those who are not aware, sending the flag through villages and towns is an old tradition in western Ukraine. It signifies a call to rebellion or uprising. It was not the Ukrainian flag that was sent, but the Bandera flag, the flag of Ukrainian nationalism.

Why were these particular victims chosen?

The death of a "person of Caucasian nationality" should cause a stir in the Armenian community. The Armenian community, as it turned out, is the most crime-prone in Ukraine. The outrage of potentially violent people contributes to destabilizing the situation. Moreover, the deceased joked on his Vkontakte page that he was friends with Chechen terrorists.

The murder of a Belarusian opposition member should create the idea in the minds of ordinary people that it is revenge by the "criminal Belarusian regime" in the person of Batka, Putin, and the Customs Union. At the same time, Belarusian opposition members are given a warning that they will be killed soon, just like in Ukraine.

The murder (or causing death) of people from Lviv is obvious. It is fueling the confrontation between West and East. In order for the people of Lviv not to doubt and clearly understand what to do, they left Igor Lutsenko alive, after showing him the criminal faces of the "Donetsk authorities," and he then broadcast them to the whole country.

And here is an interesting phrase on the air of Channel 5, said by Tsarev. "I have been saying for two weeks that Maidan needs victims."

For some reason, I believe this version more. Why would Yanukovych need corpses? That's right – he doesn't. But the opposition desperately needs them.
Here's another quote from the same source: