Auto-translated
I'll add my two cents as well.
The most interesting thing is that all these "defenders of Maidan" are not from the capital, and they only know about it from the media and blindly believe what the media tells them. Accordingly, their opponents believe what they are told. If you knew what the attitude towards this is in Kyiv... As they say, it's better to see it once than to hear about it a hundred times.
Next, a little background, all IMHO.
Back in the early 2000s, the only candidate who seemed adequate to me was Yushchenko, when he was still the head of the National Bank. Then came 2004, and we all remember how it ended. But back then, the opposition offered alternatives to the current government, and people believed and gathered on Maidan for an idea. What do we have now? Either the same slogans that have failed before, or nothing at all, just "remove Yanukovych, and we will live better."
And none of those present in these 50 pages has answered why, after removing Yanukovych, we will live better? Who, how, and by what methods will this be achieved?
Furthermore, it is very interesting who gave Satir and others the right to express their opinion as the opinion of ALL of Ukraine? Please, only speak for yourself and for your circle of friends. If 100% of them agree with you, that does not mean that 100% of Ukraine agrees with you.
And finally, a simple piece of advice to all those who sympathize: come and see everything with your own eyes. This is no longer the Maidan that it was at the beginning of December. Smart people realized that this is just another scam and went home. Only the uneducated, fanatics, and those who are being paid remain.