Skip to content

Posts from CIS-2014 in Minsk.

Closed Topic
No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
User Avatar
12 years ago
Auto-translated
Good idea, at least until the final stages.
In reply to =Lizard=
User Avatar
12 years ago
Auto-translated
Lizard B


1. The SoD player chooses the game version.
2. In case it is SoD, the VT player chooses a template.
3. In case it is VT, the SoD player chooses a template.
Would a true SoD player choose VT? Something doesn't add up. Just to be able to choose a template?
In reply to =Lizard=
User Avatar
12 years ago
Auto-translated
Lizard B
1. The comrade chooses the game version.
5 points for sarcasm...

Maybe we should wait until the recording is finished; maybe there will be 1-2 comrades there, and the rest will be from the workshop.
12 years ago
Auto-translated
Kostya, that's a good idea, I like it. I'm in!
In reply to scorp
User Avatar
12 years ago
Auto-translated
scorp
5 points for sarcasm...

Maybe we should wait until the recording is finished; perhaps there will be 1-2 Sodovets players, and the rest will be from other teams.

There is no sarcasm here. I am not engaging in idle chatter and am only offering suggestions that are relevant. Sodovets will likely be the majority. The idea mentioned above is based on the following main criteria: 1. Fairness while maintaining the priority of Sodovets, as initially promised; 2. A significant reduction in the time spent on arguments, discussions, etc., before the actual games.
12 years ago
Auto-translated
Oh, it's not a given that they will be the majority) Take the number of participants in Odessa and the SoD champ in Kyiv - base your assumptions on that)
In reply to Lider1
User Avatar
12 years ago
Auto-translated
Lider1
The Organizer might be a clown, but why was he banned? I still don't understand. Or is this moderation guru some kind of tortured romantic?

A ban based solely on the fact that he "didn't like" him?

Here's the answer for you: the guy comes to the forum only to express his disapproval. Literally in the 2nd post (maybe 3rd, who knows), he calls everyone playing SoD sheep, and the word sheep is specifically highlighted, meaning the insult was intentional. I don't consider myself a sheep—I gave 25 points for myself (Public Insult), asked some other people—for some reason they felt the same way too, so I gave 25 for them as well, and then he goes and gets himself banned)
If anyone thinks I did it for no reason, please, there is Kostya Dirty; I think he can overturn my ban, but I believe I acted correctly, and if he appears again and continues in the same vein—I'll ban him again. That's what kind of "bad and arrogant guru moderator" I am :o
In reply to =Lizard=
User Avatar
12 years ago
Auto-translated
Lizard B
There is no sarcasm here. I'm not engaging in pointless chatter and only offering constructive suggestions. There will likely be more SoD players. The aforementioned idea is based on the following key criteria: 1. Fairness while maintaining the priority of SoD, as initially promised; 2. A significant reduction in the time spent on arguments, discussions, etc., before the actual games.
Kostya, please clarify one point: please publish lists indicating who you consider to be true SoD players and who are true VT players.
You don't have to look far for examples: both Stinger and I have already stated that, yes, we prefer the VT gameplay, but given the current situation, we believe it is necessary to hold the tournament on SoD (with the exception of mirror matches).
In reply to злой_романтик
User Avatar
12 years ago
Auto-translated
evil_romantic
Here's my answer: this guy comes to the forum just to say his piece, literally in his second (or maybe third) post, calls everyone who plays SOD sheep, and the word "sheep" is specifically emphasized, meaning the insult is intentional. I don't consider myself a sheep – I gave 25 points for myself (public insult), and asked some other people – they also gave 25 points for themselves, and then he just bans himself.
If someone thinks I was wrong, please, there's Kostya Dirty, I think he can lift my ban, but I think I did the right thing, and if he appears again and continues in the same vein, I'll ban him again, that's what kind of "bad and conceited guru moderator" I am :o
you're just a "sleeping romantic" :D
In reply to злой_романтик
User Avatar
12 years ago
Auto-translated
evil_romantic
Here's my answer: this guy comes to the forum just to say his piece, literally in his second message (maybe third – I don't know), calls everyone playing SOD sheep, and the word "sheep" is specifically emphasized, meaning the insult is intentional. I don't consider myself a sheep – I gave 25 points for myself (public insult), and asked some other people – they also gave 25 points for themselves, and then he goes and bans himself.
If someone thinks I was wrong, please, there's Kostya Dirty, I think he can lift my ban, but I think I did the right thing, and if he appears again and continues in the same vein, I'll ban him again, that's what kind of "bad and conceited guru moderator" I am.
And I don't give a damn about you – you can wipe your mouth and ban me.
In reply to iDD
User Avatar
12 years ago
Auto-translated
PReDS
And I say, what the heck – you can wipe your mouth and ban people.
Preds, I don't understand, what are you getting at? Was I supposed to start a fight on the entire forum or catch him near the entrance?
iDD
you're just a "sleeping romantic" :D
Caught him! :D
User Avatar
12 years ago
Auto-translated
Well, I think the ban was justified. Seriously, a troll pops up out of nowhere, calls a bunch of people sheep, and thinks he's clever. Besides, it was a point deduction, not a direct ban. The ban happens automatically after a certain threshold is reached. And how else do you deal with these "fighters" in real life? They're quiet little people who know what will happen if they open their mouths, but here they're the kings of free speech.
In reply to =Lizard=
User Avatar
12 years ago
Auto-translated
Lizard B
I propose the following system for discussion.

In matches of the type "true-SoD player vs true-HotA player" do the following:

1. The SoD player chooses the game version.
2. If it is SoD, the HotA player chooses the template.
3. If it is HotA, the SoD player chooses the template.
And in the end it will still be Jebus Cross)
Overall a good idea, but it needs playtesting
In reply to Javdet
User Avatar
12 years ago
Auto-translated
Javdet
And the end result will still be Jebus Cross)
Overall a good idea, but it needs playtesting
Or even worse, panic balance sm-ka)))))
I wrote earlier that the king of the hill version might work, if the SoD player chooses the version, then the WT player chooses 2-3 templates they are comfortable playing on, but many just want to talk sh*t especially the Leader, who busts their ass but will hardly come themselves. I suggest that those who don't plan to come should go to the bleachers and discuss SoD vs WT as much as they want there. And in this thread from now on, give penalty points for spamming to such people.
In reply to PReDS
User Avatar
12 years ago
Auto-translated
2P.S.: By "true-SoD player" in this context, understand a person who submitted an application to participate in SNГ-2014 on the "SoD" version (see the "LIST OF PARTICIPANTS" thread). "True-TWS player" – similarly.

2Javdet: Jebus Cross SoD for an offline tournament, IMHO, is fine. It's fun, relatively fast, and without tedious rests upon meeting.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: recijeb