Skip to content

Posts from Mafia 73. Forest Kingdom Auto-translated

Mafia Closed Topic
5.0 (1 rating)
In reply to Драккошка
User Avatar
#1215
Auto-translated
Drakkoska
Sesam, are you a hunter?
Heroist
Yes, I think so.
Heroist
Sesam resisted with weapons. The dryad doesn't seem to have any.
Do you think a net or a tusk is a weapon? She's a hunter. And you're a suspicious type...:smile04:
Drakkoska
Nebka wasn't resurrected.
It looks like they made a potion from the guardian...:(

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

In reply to Heroist
User Avatar
#1216
Auto-translated
Ugh, finally I can properly post in the thread. For three days now, I haven't been able to read anything because the internet was down, so sorry if I don't understand something.
Sesam resisted with weapons. The dryad doesn't seem to have any.
The ranger also doesn't seem to have any. And the hunter has a sword visible on his back.
by the way, if you look at the picture of the day, they were killing orcs... although, I don't know who among the green-skinned creatures has a sword and is wearing armor, except perhaps the chieftain.
The chieftain isn't particularly heavily armored) At least, compared to the lolodin. I think the lolodin was killed, but the picture together with the title "vultures" might hint that the orcs came to the corpse? And the ranger, who decided to kill, might have encountered natural defenses.
I'm too f*cking old
To sell my soul
User Avatar
#1217
Auto-translated
Where does it say that Sesam had a sword? Sincerely, Gur
"Пришел, увидел и пропил..."

Хай Гурий Слесарь
In reply to WishmasteR
User Avatar
#1218
Auto-translated
Where does it say that Sesames had a sword?
Sesame tried to resist, but with her weapon, it was useless.
It doesn't necessarily have to be a sword, but she should have some kind of weapon.
And Oot was an engineer, right? So, it turns out that among the dwarves, there's a miner, a scout, and possibly a commander still alive, while among the orcs, there's a chieftain and one or two others whose roles are unclear?
I think I'll go to sleep for now and tomorrow I'll try to create at least a table for myself and figure out the roles.
I'm too f*cking old
To sell my soul
User Avatar
#1219
Auto-translated
Hang Vishmaster.

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#1220
Auto-translated
I'll read and check it out again tomorrow, but right now I really want to sleep.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#1221
Auto-translated
If anyone has any questions, feel free to ask them.

Be strong. Believe
User Avatar
#1222
Auto-translated
And it seems the potion was brewed from a Guardian and a Standard Bearer.

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

#1223
Auto-translated
"Oh night, what have you wrought, oh night?"

Since the green-skinned creatures are determined not to die, I forced myself to thoroughly reconsider my interpretation of the clue about the wormhole.

Now I've taken a more logically sound approach: from user profiles to wormholes (my previous interpretation was simply based on an association triggered by Yashur's avatar, which is somewhat flimsy). Meticulously examining each element of each profile on the list, I arrived at Wolfstet and discovered that she uses GLaDOS art as her avatar (here), which, in turn, is a character from the computer games Portal and Portal 2, a supercomputer for the Aperture Science Laboratories. And in these games, portals are "two linked rifts in space through which one can instantly move oneself or transport objects." That is, approximately what wormholes are in theory... the theory of wormholes. :rolleyes:

I like this interpretation more than my previous one, so I apologize to Yashur for my persistent suspicions based on this clue and vote: Execute Wolfstet.

I suspect that the orcs are now more dangerous than anyone else to the Forest, so I believe that executing the green-skinned creature is the most correct decision in this situation.

..
User Avatar
#1224
Auto-translated
Shamrock Rover
I believe executing the green-skinned creature is the most appropriate solution in this situation.
Oh, really???:smile04: Then Wolfstet isn't a good fit. Along with Vishmaster and Neyra, she belongs to the gnome race. But your "repentance" raises some questions.:smile51: I was also wrong about you. I thought you were peaceful...:(

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

In reply to Злобный Ящур
#1225
Auto-translated
Evil Lizard
Then Wolfstet isn't suitable. Along with Vishmaster and Neyra, she belongs to the race of dwarves.

What makes you so sure?
User Avatar
#1226
Auto-translated
Alright, let's think about this for a bit...
Executing Oota - 8 votes (Ment, Shamrock, Sesam, Tox, Kosha, Yashchur, Gur, Heroist)
No resurrection -> no Guardian -> there were 5 villagers yesterday. Dag and MyHighness, who are villagers, didn't vote to execute Oota -> that's 3 villagers. The remaining 5 votes are from the Hunter, Paladin, and 3 Orcs. There are no votes from Vishmaster, Wolfstet, and Neyra. Or do you believe that one of the Gnomes cast the deciding vote to eliminate their own Oota? I highly doubt it...

Added after 11 minutes
Although, we could also execute Wolfstet. She seems to be a Miner. Which means she's a blocker.

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

In reply to Злобный Ящур
#1227
Auto-translated
Evil Lizard
No resurrection -> no guardian.

In general, this is incorrect.

Evil Lizard
The peaceful players Dag and MyHighness didn't vote for Oot's execution -> 3 peaceful players.

Dag is understandable, but who do you consider MyHighness to be? I highly doubt they are a "Guardian," because the paladin wasn't attacking them; they simply "took the threat upon themselves." The Guardian doesn't have non-damage protection, but the Engineer does. And the Engineer can also shoot, so the conclusion is obvious...

So, there are options.
User Avatar
#1228
Auto-translated
Shamrock Rover
Generally speaking, this is incorrect.
Do you have another explanation for the absence of resurrection?
Shamrock Rover
Who do you consider MyHighness to be?
Still, a defender. If she's an engineer, then who did we hang yesterday? With such a sharp mind?

Added after 3 minutes
Arandor
If anyone has questions, feel free to ask.
Does the Paladin kill only one defender, or along with the target?

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.

(Закон сохранения).

User Avatar
#1229
Auto-translated
Does the Paladin kill only one defender or the target as well?
Only the defender.

Be strong. Believe