Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I would assign priorities with coefficients for the games leading up to the final, for example, green would get 3 points if it forces the red to surrender or kills the red, 2 points for blue, and 1 point for brown, and so on for all colors. This rule would encourage players to randomly distribute themselves before the game and try to eliminate the player who will give them the most points. For example, the system could start not with a full double elimination, but with groups. For instance, if two players with the same faction end up in a game, they might not fight each other because of the points awarded for eliminating certain factions. Something along those lines.
лето 2012.
Palach HP
Auto-translated
It would be interesting to see situations where there are traitors among the allies, killing the commanders of the alliance during a rush, and what the relationship between them will be after the game...
I would assign priorities with coefficients for games leading up to the final, for example, green if it forces the opponent to surrender or kills red, it gets 3 points, if blue, 2 points, if brown, 1 point, and so on for all, thus this rule will force players to randomly distribute themselves before the game and strive to eliminate the one for whom they will get more points, and, for example, start the system not with a full double, but with groups. For example, if 2 fish are in the game, it is not a fact that they will not fight among themselves for passing points, something like that.
and how many people should be in a group? how many games will there be in it, and how will the participants be selected?
Added 46 seconds ago Palach HP
It will be interesting to see cases where there are traitors among the allies, killing alliance commanders during the game, and what the relationship will be between them after the game)...
but the rules say about intrigues and betrayals, everyone is aware of it, those who signed up:cool:
435-191-039 Discord Iamsamstan#6087
Gomunguls
Auto-translated
Everyone who expressed interest has been registered! Except for the following players:
=Bercik= (681053441)
DeadOk (477114411)
We will get back to you!
I would assign priorities with coefficients before the games reach the finals, for example, green if it forces the red player to surrender or kills the red player, it gets 3 points, if it's blue, 2 points, if it's brown, 1 point, and so on for all, thus this rule will force players to randomly distribute themselves before the game and strive to eliminate the one for whom they will get more points, and, for example, start the system not with a full double, but with groups... For example, if 2 fish get into the game, it is not a fact that they will not fight each other for passing points, something like that.
This complicates everything too much, and I don't see the point in it. Our main goal is to fight and have one winner, why do we need coefficients? Personally, I can't imagine what I will do when such a match starts) where to run and whether it's worth it and where to start))... and you're still talking about coefficients)):smile15:
Added 9 minutes ago
and how many people should be in a group? how many games will be in it and how will the participants be selected?
For now, we need to recruit at least 32 people, if we recruit 64, it will be even more interesting)) I will draw up the table closer to the tournament, the participants will be randomly distributed by drawing lots! The start is excellent, already 17 people have signed up in a day!
1. Scrolls of levels 4 and 5 - Magic scrolls of levels 4 and 5 can only be used if a corresponding level of the Mage Guild has been built in one of your Castles (visiting the Castle is not required). It does not matter whether the Castles with built Mage Guild levels will subsequently be controlled. If you do not have the corresponding level of the Mage Guild in your Castles, you must completely build all levels of the Mage Guild in any two Castles that you own. (I hope it is clear to everyone now :) ) 2. Streams and broadcasts - if a player has agreed to play in an alliance with another player (or players) or for other reasons and in any way allowed him (or them) to watch his broadcast or stream, then he is responsible for the use of this information not in his interests at any stage of the game. Example: Player A gave a stream to Player B, and then, during the game, for some reason, Player B decided to attack Player A. In this case, Player A's claims will not be considered! In all other cases, the punishment for watching other people's streams will be very severe!:smile29: 3. Capitulation - all players can freely capture cities, mines, stashes, and other property of the player who has surrendered. In turn, the player who has surrendered can make all his last actions only on the turn when he surrendered; on the turn of leaving the game, the surrendering player no longer has the right to take any actions.
Here's another question: is this coin from World of Xeen or another game? If it's from World of Xeen, I don't have one.
Good question, mostly it's from World of Xeen, if we don't have one, we'll figure something out. I checked on Yandex, asked it to flip a coin, and this came up: http://orelilireshka.ru/, I flipped the coin and it worked fine.
It would be interesting to see cases where there are traitors among the allies, killing alliance commanders during a rush, and what the relationship between them will be after the game...
I also liked the tournament idea, but after thinking about betrayal, I didn't like it somehow... Betrayal is bad in any case, and besides, it contradicts the rules of the portal.
But in any case, I'm signing up, 263293484
Nestor86
Auto-translated
Nestor86 641974585 I'm signing up. I will play on my own, without any alliances.
Gomunguls
Auto-translated
I've noted everything mentioned above.
I also really liked the tournament idea, but after thinking about betrayal, I didn't like it somehow... Betrayal is bad in any case, and besides, it contradicts the rules of the portal.
Of course, I'm not in favor of betrayal, but I think there will be many different situations here, for example...
You and someone else agreed to play together (you're not very good friends with him) (for example, your numbers are 1 and 2) against 2 others (numbers 3 and 4), you got a decent hand, and one of them got a great hand and wins (number 3 defeats number 4)... you're left with three - number 3 and 1 and 2 in an alliance... what do you do next? Fight each other or go to war against the third?
DeadOk
