Posts from Forum

Bring back the Tribune! Topic by Cash. I doubt he changed it.

Bring back the Tribune! This is about Cash. I doubt he changed it.

I don't doubt that Cash didn't change anything.

I doubt he would like what Ariputra is writing. But what he writes is no longer a tribune, but an "Ariputra's well," and that accurately reflects the reality of this topic.

I also doubt that Cash cares about this at all.

Why are you worried about Cash?

I don't doubt that Cash didn't change anything.

I doubt he would like what Ariputra is writing. But what he writes is no longer a forum, but an "Ariputra's well," and this accurately reflects the reality of this topic.

I also doubt that Cash cares about this at all.

Why are you worried about Cash?

I'm not worried about Cash. Moderators don't have the right to change other users' topics. Imagine, for example, that you had a topic, and someone changed it on a whim.

It was a forum all along, and then some guy changed it just because he wanted to, without asking anyone. That's ridiculous. This isn't his forum (not the one who changed it), but ours, and at the very least, someone other than the Creator should have the right to change it, but only after some kind of vote, which didn't happen.

Better take a break :)
It will also help you to relax your mind.

From April 10th to 30th, participate in the online quest “ATLANTIC WARS”! — Atlant household appliances.

participate in the online quest “ATLANTIC WARS”! — Atlant household appliances

Oh yeah! We actually bought a new washing machine just the other day.
And we still have "Gorizont" and "Vityaz" brands here in Belarus!.. Check out how it sounds: "Horizontal Wars"! :D

Today, I also decided to find out what "Ingliism" is.

Ingliism (full name: Ancient Russian Inglistic Church of Orthodox Old Believers-Inglings) is a new religious movement, one of the branches of Slavic neopaganism, but often not recognized by supporters of other branches of Slavic neopaganism. It was registered in Omsk (referred to by Ingliists as Asgard) in 1992 by Alexander Khinevich and officially formed by 1998. Despite the external similarity, it has no relation to Rodnovery.
In 2009, all registered Inglist organizations were closed due to alleged involvement in extremist activities (in particular, the promotion of the idea of racial superiority of "Slavic-Aryans" and the use of the swastika symbol - "kolovrat").

http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D0%BD%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8B

By the way, once I suggested that the user ariputra might be this guy. But then I decided that it probably wasn't him, although there are several similar traits in character and views. I don't think Datsik plays "Heroes"... although, who knows... :)

Khinevich, by the way, is also Jewish, and has been an embedded FSB agent for many years.

I want to say again that I am not against Jews, I am against Zionists and Zionism (Nazism). I am against their concealment of real history and their own crimes.

For example, the former head of the Russian "Christian" "Orthodox" Church, Alexy II (who died relatively recently), was born Alexei Riddiger, a German Jew, and a KGB agent with 50 years of experience. The current "Patriarch of All Russia," Kirill Gundyaev, is also a KGB agent.

Surprisingly, Kirill Gundyaev's spiritual advisor is Ber Lazar, the chief rabbi of Russia. Gundyaev openly, as does Torra, calls Slavs two-legged animals that Cyril and Methodius took down from the trees, washed their fur, and taught them to speak.

Torra openly calls all non-Jews two-legged animals, claims that the life of a Jew is more valuable than the life of any other person, openly claims that killing a non-Jew to save the life of a Jew (for example, for a kidney transplant) is not a sin, and openly claims that a Jew is not allowed to lend money to another Jew at interest, but lending money to a non-Jew at interest is not a sin.

If you don't believe it, read Torra!!!!!!!!!!!

Now, almost all Slavic, pro-Slavic, or supposedly Slavic organizations, whose activities are actually aimed or supposedly aimed at the revival of the original Russian-Slavic culture (which the Jews have been systematically destroying for 100 years) are headed by Jews, and not just Jews, but KGB agents. And Khinevich, unfortunately, is no exception. But many of the things Khinevich says are very correct and reasonable. For example, he says that we must observe the 10 biblical commandments, or that the life of the soul does not end with the death of the body.

The FSB's task is to lead all organizations and movements by introducing its agents, with the aim of making any possible popular uprisings controlled and managed. The FSB operates on the principle: what cannot be defeated must be led and directed in the right direction.

And the people are already on the verge, they are being oppressed from all sides (with drugs, alcohol, vaccinations, housing and communal services tariffs, etc.), and our Jewish leaders understand this perfectly - so they have expanded the internal structures (Ministry of Internal Affairs, FSB, Prosecutor's Office, Ministry of Emergency Situations, MUR, GRU, etc.) to 4.5 million people - to fight against "their own" people, to fight against the people they consider sheep and whom (us) they deceive like sheep.

But I am not calling for any uprisings, I am only calling for people not to be ignorant.

once I suggested

O'Barmot, you are like a woman - you come up with something and live happily in your illusions ^^

Or like modern "science," which also assumes something, presents it as the absolute truth, and then says: "Oops, we made a mistake. Sorry, we were wrong. It happens to everyone" ^^

__________________________
A joke:

Stalin is brought a snitch, Stalin listens to him and says - execute. The accompanying guard looks at Stalin with bewilderment, at the snitch, then at Stalin again - takes out a revolver and shoots the snitch. Stalin smokes a pipe, looks at the dead snitch, and after a minute says: "Oops, reward him, I made a mistake!"

I can't understand: either our wisest one did not deem my insignificant remarks worthy of his generous attention, or does he have nothing to object to on the merits?

Kostyan, I honestly searched for your remarks in Yandex, Mail, Google, but I couldn't find them. I asked Yasen, and Topol, I asked Autumn, I asked the rain, I asked the month, I asked the cloud - the cloud melted in the heavenly blue ^^

I even filed a report in the nearest police station ^^ they said they would throw all their forces into searching for them. )

________
Seriously, I can't find the message with the remarks you are talking about, please write it again.

The essence of Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam is the same — only the form differs.

Learn the fundamentals, you slacker.

What makes me so repulsive to you — is it that I speak the truth?
Well yes, the truth is hard to hear, it hurts.

If someone claims that the essence of Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam is the same, that means only ONE thing. They do not understand the essence of Buddhism, nor the essence of Islam or Christianity. Generally speaking, Islam and Judaism are far closer to each other than Islam and Buddhism. In fact, if you delve into the narrative fabric of Ariputra's expositions, the logical and beautiful finale would be the protagonist admitting that he himself belongs to the Jewish people — I wonder if the author will have enough dramatic courage for that.

Wicc:

Regardless of who is right in the discussion, the format of the public debate was maintained in good style — relatively few emotions and label-sticking (there was some banter, but it was civilized), plenty of logic, analysis of the opponent's arguments (instead of re-declaring one's own theses for the Nth time), and many references to data from various trustworthy statistics websites.

Frankly, drawing a parallel here between FritzMorgen's discussions — even turning a blind eye to what he "works with" — and Ariputra's devastating revelations seems, in my opinion, completely wrong. Let me try to explain why I think so.

In the human consciousness, as known from psychoanalysis, one can find two components, conventionally called the logical and the mythological. For an example, take a resident of the USSR, say from the mid-20th century. That which constitutes a person's daily activities — professional plans, trips to the store, earning money — belongs to the logical part of their consciousness. But what relates to attitudes toward the party and the leader belongs to the mythological side. Using only the logical part of an individual's consciousness for one's own purposes, it is impossible (or incredibly difficult) to make a person, for instance, go to their death, throw themselves into an embrasure. However, by manipulating the mythological component, such a thing may very well succeed (e.g., Japanese kamikaze pilots). There is no clear boundary where the logical component transitions into the mythological. At the same time, behavior driven by different natures of motivation will differ sharply.

For instance, this can be clearly observed in an argument. If you try to object to someone's belief related to the first nature, the person will most likely attempt to logically refute your point of view. A completely different reaction occurs if you touch the "mythological" side (for example, suggesting to a patriot that they consider selling the Kuril Islands to Japan). The person starts losing their composure, feels the urge to shout and stomp their feet; in their response, we see not logic but overwhelming emotions.
Manipulating the "mythological" part of consciousness is also possible, but as a rule, it is done by other means; moreover, a person must possess certain qualities to successfully handle this — talent, the power of emotional influence (examples of such people include ancient "prophets," or, say, Savonarola).

Now, what was the digression for? The fact is that the example of Vic's internet discussion undoubtedly pertains to the "logical" nature of consciousness. There were figures — say, 80%, 120%, or 90% — and the discussion, on the whole, was conducted in the appropriate vein. Our lyrical Aryan hero, on the other hand, is trying to influence the "mythological" part of consciousness. The trouble is, due to a lack of the requisite aptitude, the result ends up being some sort of shameful absurdity. For example, a strongman steps onto the platform, all the spectators await a record, and in the end — he simply loudly soils himself; roughly that impression arises after reading and, more importantly, attempting to digest 90% of Ariputra's opuses. Accordingly, Ariputra's manner is very clearly traced in his style. The abundance of demotivators indicates that Ariputra is trying to manipulate the "mythological" side of consciousness. Also, Ariputra considers shock to be an incredibly important technique of influence. Therefore, he presumably shoves something shocking into every opus of his — whether it is appropriate or, on the contrary, meaningless. For the sake of shock, he is ready to gather the lowest-grade fabrications and pass them off as truthful. For example, in his link about the population of Russia, where the figure of 90 million is mentioned, one can find that the authors were not talking about the population of Russia, but about the RUSSIAN population. Which, of course, gives the final figure around 100 million. We await new, definitely SHOCKING revelations from Ariputra of all HeroesWorld.

P.S. What is the point of disavowing the Inglists, if ALL of Ariputra's stated beliefs coincide with what the followers of A. Khinevich say (etymology, Slava, Nav, Prav, etc.)?

Good post.

If a person claims that the essence of Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam is the same, it means only ONE thing: they do not understand the essence of Buddhism, Islam, or Christianity.

But what is the essence of any religion in general, and Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam in particular?;)

And the similarities between, for example, Buddhism and Christianity are much greater than the differences (see, for example, D.T. Suzuki's book "Mysticism: Christian and Buddhist").

Similarities between religions may only manifest in moral norms, but they are nowhere near the most important, philosophical component present in Christianity. Moreover, many philosophical ideas of Buddhism are the complete opposite of Christian ones. In Islam and Judaism, many postulates are similar to each other and to Christian ones, at least because all these religions revere the same book, namely the Old Testament.

Good post.

Maybe Ariputra will read it and understand how to express his thoughts clearly and logically, without hysteria and nonsense.

Perhaps Ariputra will read it and understand how to express his thoughts clearly and coherently, without hysteria and nonsense.

I'm more likely to believe in a flying elephant in orbit.

...according to astronauts... according to Ekaterina Utilina... and others like them... :D :D

An informative article in which the author examined a couple of dozen common modern myths ("urban legends") and delivered a verdict on each of them. Most turned out to be fabrications, but some contain a grain of truth.

I'm not trying to convince you of anything, Ariputra. Just keep drinking your water and die.

StickyFingaz, this is a variation of an old (from 1990) joke:
Dihydrogen Monoxide

Recently, researchers discovered that our water supply systems are contaminated with a dangerous chemical. This chemical is colorless, odorless, and tasteless. It kills countless people every year. The government has taken no steps to regulate this dangerous contamination. This chemical is called "dihydrogen monoxide."
The chemical is used for the following purposes:
In manufacturing as a solvent and coolant
In nuclear reactors
In the production of foam
In fire extinguishers
In chemical and biological laboratories
In the production of pesticides
In artificial food additives
The chemical is a major component of acid rain
It contributes to soil erosion
It accelerates corrosion and damages most electrical appliances
Prolonged contact with the chemical in its solid form leads to serious skin damage
Contact with the gaseous form of the chemical leads to severe burns
Inhaling even a small amount of the chemical can be fatal
The chemical is found in malignant tumors, abscesses, ulcers, and other painful changes in the body
The chemical causes drug addiction; victims who abstain from consuming the chemical face death within 168 hours
No known cleaner can completely remove this chemical from water
Despite these dangers, the chemical is actively and unpunishedly used in industry. Many corporations receive tons of the chemical daily through specially laid underground pipelines. People working with the chemical generally do not receive special clothing or training. Waste chemical is dumped into rivers and seas by the ton.
We urge the public to be aware and protest against the continued use of this dangerous chemical!

http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%E8%E3%E8%E4%F0%EE%E3%E5%ED%E0_%EC%MO%ED%EE%EE%EA%F1%E8%E4

The joke is intended to illustrate how a lack of scientific knowledge and biased analysis can lead to panic.