Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
You've turned everything upside down again, accusing me of something you're actually guilty of. :)
Mент
No, it's your fault. Notice that I always use logic and common sense in my posts.
Logic? Lol. From a logical point of view, you couldn't even prove such a simple thing as the existence of Australia. What logic are you talking about?
I could continue to analyze your message, but it's impossible to argue with you – I say one thing, and you say another.
You accuse me of being unable to prove anything, but you couldn't prove anything to me within the framework of our game, which we had previously agreed upon. That's exactly what needed to be proven within the context of this game, and you even admitted it.
Okay, this is all turning into an argument for the sake of arguing, a pointless debate.
Eat GMOs and be happy ;-)
Added 19 minutes ago
Jurstis
) But the most harmful thing is life itself; you die from it.
Death is a law of nature, a law of God for the material world.
There is a verse in the scriptures: "He who is born must die, and he who dies must be born again."
But the soul itself – the living being – you, me, we – is immortal. The soul was never born and will never die. It is eternal by its very nature. That's why no one wants to die. Death contradicts the natural, original nature of the soul.
Death is a process – when the soul in the subtle body (mental) leaves the gross physical body forever. And sleep is when the soul leaves the gross physical body temporarily.
___________________
And the question is not whether you (or I) will die – the question is how you will die and where you (the soul – the living being) will go after death? What kind of birth will you receive? In the womb of what new mother, in what family, in what conditions? In the body of a human or in the body of an animal?
What will happen to you after death?
In Dumas's "The Three Musketeers," twenty years later, Porthos says to someone: "It's better to die in a pool of blood in battle than in a pool of your own urine."
Death in battle is the most honorable death for a warrior. And the death that we (your death, my death, the death of most people) die is like the death of cats and dogs. So, what is the difference between us and animals?
Лидер
Where is the proof about the population decreasing to 89 million? Or is it not customary to answer inconvenient questions? It's better to pretend you didn't hear.
= Лидер
Mom, give me a tit, Mom, you promised to give me a tit, please, give me a tit, why don't you notice me?
=)))
________
I've already given you a thousand links that you have successfully ignored.
But in general, go to Google, Yandex, or YouTube and type in "population of Russia according to the registry office," and you'll find thousands of links.
ariputra
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Chingis
I'm not an expert on GMOs and food additives.
But, as far as I know, the problem with GMOs is that these products have a slightly different percentage of vitamins and minerals.
That's exactly why you're not an expert.
What do trace elements and vitamins have to do with it????
GMOs lead to blood cancer (leukemia) and infertility in the 2nd or 3rd generation.
GMOs are a weapon of mass destruction – used to sterilize a nation. Why fight if you can simply sterilize an entire people? – and they will die out on their own.
Chingis
In a generation, new people may be better adapted to GMOs.
If you eat GMOs, there won't be a next generation. Well, you have the opportunity to test this on yourself.
"According to the Central Analytical Center of the Russian Federation, Department of the Civil Registry Office, as of June 1, 2010, there were only 89.6 million people officially registered as living in the Russian Federation, and not 142 million, as officially stated in the population census." In 1992, there were 148.7 million people in Russia – 89.7 million in 2010, a population loss of 59 million people. They are very afraid to talk about the figure of our real losses of 59 million people. And they won't. All the footnotes to this information have been removed from Yandex, but it can be found on Google.
The country is being destroyed by drugs and alcohol through laws and policies supported by the party and personally by Putin: http://glob.us-in.net/prigovor_06.php - not working, well, they deleted it.
Note that we don't even need invaders. The population of Russia is very effectively destroyed by the Russian government. Such a policy of destroying a people is called genocide in international practice."
It's easier to falsify the results of a census than to take a candy from a child. What's there to be surprised about?
It's good that you asked :) I was just going to write about it, but there was no reason to.
What you mean by immunity is clear.
But GMOs, regardless of immunity, lead to blood cancer and infertility in the 2nd or 3rd generation. Studies on rats have proven this.
Disease is suffering, and the cause of any suffering is the sinful activity of a living being.
Sin is the conscious violation of the laws of God for the material world, and here, as in jurisprudence (or rather, the other way around), ignorance of the law does not excuse one from responsibility.
The cause of any disease at a crude level – the crude physical body – is a problem at a subtle material level – a problem of the subtle body.
For example, oncological diseases are associated with varying degrees of resentment (hatred).
If a person leads a dissolute lifestyle, this will ultimately lead to diseases of the skin surface, to despair and melancholy – and this will lead to cirrhosis of the liver. There are a huge number of documented cases of cirrhosis of the liver in people who do not drink.
Melancholy is when there is no happiness in life. An alcoholic also drinks precisely because he lacks happiness and seeks it in narcotic states, which alcohol provides for a while (but the price is very high).
The cause of any disease is ultimately our immorality, sinful activity, and unwillingness to accept the laws of God, the laws of nature.
And those who, in this case, destroy us with mass vaccinations, GMOs, alcohol, drugs, and debauchery are the executors of our karma. Study the law of karma, and there will be no questions in this area.
The Law of Karma is the law of justice, the law of retribution, the world is a mirror, do not spit in the well – you will not be able to get the water back, every action has a reaction (consequences), as you sow, so shall you reap – these are all descriptions of the Law of Karma.
Chingis, in general, you are absolutely right, weakening of the immune system leads to diseases.
But in this case, the situation is different, for example: A person was hit on the head with a sledgehammer, his skull was opened, his brains were spilled on the asphalt, as a result of which he died, and you say that he died because his immune system was weak :-))
GMOs naturally affect the immune system, but in addition to the immune system, GMOs lead to blood cancer and infertility in the 2nd or 3rd generation.
A person may be physically healthy, for example, but infertile. This is the result of GMOs.
I already gave you a thousand links that you successfully ignored.
Do you really think I read all that nonsense you spout? You don't need thousands of links, you need one specific link for me! as you were asked. Normal people quote the message so it's clear, so you don't have to search. It's basic etiquette that you like to talk about, but you don't follow it. ariputra
Mom, give me the breast, Mom, you promised to give me the breast, please, give me the breast, why don't you notice me?
What are you dissatisfied with now, Your Majesty?
I already gave you the link a long time ago – it’s above. Before that, I gave you exactly the same links many times.
Who is to blame that you are short-sighted and don’t read carefully? :) And if you don’t read, then why are you asking?
If you are really that interested, Your Majesty, can’t you just Google it?
Leader
Where is the proof about the population decreasing to 89 million? Or is it not customary to answer inconvenient questions? Is it better to pretend you didn’t hear, to ignore it?
ariputra
Mom, give me a tit, Mom, you promised to give me a tit, please, give me a tit, why don’t you notice me?
Leader
Let’s avoid sick fantasies.
Oh, are you offended? Ah, yes, you can’t act like that with Tsars. I apologize. :)
_______
Instead of whining and begging for proof (like a helpless kitten that doesn’t know how to Google :)), you could go and find it yourself, if you are really interested.
Or do you need everything served on a silver platter? ;)
Normal people quote the message so it’s clear, so you don’t have to search for it. It’s basic etiquette, which you love to talk about but don’t follow.
Whose cow would moo, it’s better for yours to be silent.
You allow yourself such rudeness that you could turn off the lights. And without any reason. Any normal person would have stopped paying attention to you long ago after what you allowed yourself.
I have given you what you asked for many times, I highlighted it in bold so that you wouldn’t accidentally miss it. After that, you call it all nonsense, skip it without reading, and start asking for the link that I have already given you many times above. :)
Leader, this is especially for you, don’t miss it, and don’t whine. =)
http://rodonews.ru/news_1283520186.html
"According to the Central Analytical Center of the Russian Federation, Department of the Civil Registry Office, as of June 1, 2010, only 89.6 million people are registered in the Russian Federation, and not 142 million, as officially stated in the population census." In 1992, there were 148.7 million people in Russia – 89.7 million in 2010, a population loss of 59 million people. This is the figure of our real losses of 59 million people that they are very afraid to talk about. And they won’t. On Yandex, all the footnotes to this information have been deleted; you can find it on Google.
The country is being destroyed by drugs and alcohol through laws and policies supported by the party and personally by Putin: http://glob.us-in.net/prigovor_06.php - not working, it has probably been deleted.
Note that we don’t even need occupiers. The population of Russia is very effectively destroyed by the Russian government. Such a policy of destroying a people is called genocide in international practice."
It is easier to falsify the results of the census than to take a candy from a child. What is there to be surprised about?
There is a story from the Taoists. It’s not relevant, though. Briefly: "A man fell off a horse – that’s a misfortune. But he became more careful and prudent in his affairs, which led to wealth – that’s happiness. Wealth led to carelessness and recklessness, which led to ruin. Ruin led to illness, accelerated old age, and early death. The point: misfortune led to happiness. Happiness led to misfortune. Don’t strive for what you desire, otherwise it will turn into its opposite."
This is very relevant.
This parable reflects and illustrates the law of Karma; everything that happens to a person happens to him in accordance with his past actions committed in past lives.
This parable also illustrates that every medal has its downside.
What a person strives for ultimately can (and usually does) bring him sorrow and suffering. For example, a person strives to get married as soon as possible in order to have sex, but after 10-15-20 years, he no longer wants to think about sex (at least not with that woman), and the children who grow up bring him suffering.
But there is a very important thing here – it is the motive for which we strive for certain things. The main reason that what we strive for ultimately brings us suffering and disappointment is our selfish motive, our EGOism (We want to use everything for our own enjoyment, and not for the enjoyment of someone else – Father, Mother, God, Friends, etc.)
If a person’s main motive is to serve God, for example, or his Father and Mother – so that they are happy, satisfied, and content – then no matter what a person does or strives for, he will not suffer because of it – he will be happy and satisfied.
What is initially like nectar, in the end, is like poison, and what is initially like poison, in the end, is like nectar.
For example: alcohol, drugs – initially like nectar – they give the illusion of happiness, but in the end, complete destruction of the personality.
Going to the dentist to treat a bad tooth – initially like poison, but then the tooth will not hurt. Chingiz
Prolonged anger requires an increased concentration of vitamins and minerals. And those who are constantly angry have an increased consumption and, accordingly, a deficiency of certain elements, etc. This weakens the immune system and then leads to illness.
That emotions naturally affect a person’s health is obvious; I have already written about this a thousand times here. But here is a different situation.
GMOs affect a person’s health in addition to anger, aggression, resentment, and depression. One does not interfere with the other. They do not exclude each other. This is like two factors affecting the same process.
Just as a blow from a sledgehammer to the head can harm a person’s health in addition to anger and depression, so too do GMOs harm a person’s health in addition to anger and depression.
_______________________________ Imagine a situation:
A person has excellent immunity, excellent health, he does not get sick, he experiences wonderful emotions – but another person comes up and hits him on the head with a sledgehammer, his brains are knocked out on the asphalt, and the person dies.
In this case, what was the cause of his death – the blow from the sledgehammer (from which the brains were knocked out) or the immunity? :)
GMOs lead to the fact that the genetic structure of a person changes – which leads to leukemia and infertility in the 2nd or 3rd generation.
Instead of whining and begging for proof, which I've already given you multiple times, why don't you go and find it yourself, if you're really that interested.
Usually, people back up their opinions with facts, so it doesn't sound like simple babble. Otherwise, it turns out like this: you make a statement, and then you say, "If you're interested, look it up yourself! Google knows everything." That's hilarious!
And here's another question: who needs this more? You, so that people believe what you're writing, or me and other readers, for whom you're writing?
If you're happy with the position of a clown/babbler, that's your business!
If it's important for you to write a long post, regardless of what's in it, regardless of whether people will believe you or not, and just write it for the sake of writing, that's also your business!
So, I'm not in a position to beg for anything from you. Say A, say B, back up what you say. There are a lot of cynics here, we need facts, not blind faith.
*** Yes, I didn't see your previous post because I was writing my own post and got distracted, and then you added yours. I'll read it later. Is this Radio Radon? :D In text form? :D ariputra
Or do you need everything served on a silver platter? ;)
I need you to substantiate your words with actions, not just words.
Ment
13 years ago
Auto-translated
No, it’s not Radon, I would be surprised.
ariputra
13 years ago
Auto-translated
This is especially for you, don't miss it, and stop complaining =)[/SIZE]
http://rodonews.ru/news_1283520186.html "According to the Central Analytical Center of the Russian Federation, Department of Civil Registration, as of June 1, 2010, there were only 89.6 million people officially registered as living in the Russian Federation, and not 142 million, as stated in the official census". In 1992, there were 148.7 million people in Russia – 89.7 million in 2010, which means a population loss of 59 million people. They are very afraid to talk about this figure of our real losses of 59 million people. And they won't. All footnotes to this information have been removed from Yandex, but it can be found on Google.
The country is being destroyed by drugs and alcohol, based on laws approved by the party and personally by Putin: http://glob.us-in.net/prigovor_06.php - not working, it seems it has already been removed.
Note that we don't even need occupiers. The population of Russia is being very effectively destroyed by the Russian government. Such a policy of destroying a people is called genocide in international practice".
It is easier to falsify the results of the census than to take a candy from a child. What is there to be surprised about?
What else needs to be done for you to notice?
Lider1
13 years ago
Auto-translated
I already noticed, calm down, it's mentioned in my post above.
Yes, I didn't see the previous post because I was writing the post myself and got distracted, and then you added to it. I'll read it later.
Wicc
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Read the link.
Why should I believe her?
The text is written with clear signs of manipulation – emotional outbursts, harsh expressions, red color, caps lock, far-reaching (and completely obvious) conclusions, and a reference to some unknown person (who is Ekaterina Ulitskina?).
I have read a lot of different kinds of analysis, and so far, 100% of the texts written in a similar style have turned out to be nonsense. Perhaps the situation will change in the future, but for now, these are my observations.
Furthermore, the statement "60% of the population of Russia is of middle pension age, 67 years old" is obviously false. That is, this "employee of the analytical department of the Civil Registry Office" asks us to believe him on his word, but at the same time, in one of the points, he provides a clear falsehood. Therefore, the question of whether to believe him in the other points is simply answered.
ariputra
13 years ago
Auto-translated
I read the link.
Why should I believe it?
You don't have to. If you disagree, please do so; if you think otherwise, please do so as well. I won't argue with you, as it's pointless to argue with someone who considers themselves a great analyst and knows everything. Do you really consider yourself a great analyst? ^^
It's impossible to prove anything to a person who knows everything; they think they understand everything better than anyone else.
Do you have any authority in your life? A person or source that you are willing to believe?
Do you only believe what corresponds to your understanding of things?
In general, what and who are you willing to believe?
The text is written with clear signs of manipulation – emotional outbursts, harsh expressions, red color, caps lock, far-reaching (and completely obvious) conclusions, a reference to some unknown person (who is Ekaterina Ulitskina?).
The words used – "manipulation of consciousness" – are usually used by those who manipulate consciousness themselves, or at least try to. Government media is the one that manipulates consciousness.
I didn't see any emotional outbursts there. On the contrary, there are dry figures that are quite logical and obvious. But your perception is very emotional and one-sided.
From what you write, I can conclude that you don't really know how things are. So why are you so vehemently and insistently claiming that everything written there is nonsense?
I've read a lot of different analyses, and so far, 100% of the texts written in a similar style have turned out to be nonsense. Perhaps the situation will change in the future, but for now, that's what I've observed.
Do you consider yourself a great analyst? ^^ Are you 100% sure that you are right and that these texts that you consider nonsense are wrong? On what basis do you think so?
Where did you get the idea that the texts that you consider nonsense are really nonsense? On what basis? What are the arguments and counterarguments? Do you even allow for the possibility that you might be wrong? And is this text, for example: http://rodonews.ru/news_1283520186.html, true? Or do you not even allow for that?
What style are you talking about? And why do you think that texts written in the style you have in mind are nonsense (do not correspond to reality)?
How does the style you have in mind imply that everything written in it does not correspond to reality?
Give specific examples of texts that, in your opinion, turned out to be 100% nonsense. At least three, and why, on what basis, do you think they do not correspond to reality?
Furthermore, the statement "60% of the population of Russia is of middle pension age, 67 years old" is obviously false. That is, this "employee of the analytical department of the registry office" suggests that we should believe him on his word, but at the same time, in one of the points, he gives a clear falsehood. Therefore, the question of whether to believe him in the other points is simply answered.
Why do you think this statement is false, and even obviously false? These data on 60% of the population of Russia of middle pension age correspond to the data of the pension fund. You can check this if you wish.
If you claim that it is false, then provide at least some evidence in favor of the fact that it is false. Why do you think so?
_____________________________________________________________________ It is obvious to me that everything written in http://rodonews.ru/news_1283520186.html corresponds to reality. There are a number of other logical and documentary proofs for this.
Vikk, you are either a very stupid person who is not capable of drawing conclusions, and yet considers himself a great analyst ^^, or you know everything about what is written here - http://rodonews.ru/news_1283520186.html - and your task is to convince people of the opposite. It is easier to control ignorant people who know nothing about anything. It is easier to lead them to the right precipice at the right time.
In general, arguing with a person who considers himself a great analyst ^^, and yet makes so many absurd and ridiculous conclusions, or with a provocateur who knows everything - is pointless.
Therefore, I will simply continue. Think as you like, believe what you want. Consider as you like. I have no task to convince or dissuade anyone. My task is to inform. And everyone should draw their own conclusions.
_________________________________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0bsDZkNFs - a clip from Belarusian television news about GMOs and the infertility to which they lead.
You shouldn't. If you disagree, please say so; if you think differently, please say that too. I won't argue with you, as it's pointless to argue with someone who considers themselves a doctor of all sciences and a great analyst. Do you really think you're a great analyst? :))))
It's impossible to prove anything to a doctor of all sciences; they think they understand everything better than anyone else.
Do you have any authority in your life? A person or source that you're willing to believe?
Arguing with a proud person who thinks they know and understand everything better than others is useless.
Therefore, I'll just continue. Think as you like, believe what you want, and consider things as you wish.
_________________________________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0bsDZkNFs - a clip from Belarusian television news about GMOs and the infertility they cause.
Once again, slowly and clearly – why are you writing all this? Probably to bring the light of truth to misguided souls.
However, the format you've chosen is completely unsuitable for your goal. The reasons have been repeatedly explained to you; I've just added my own contribution.
But it seems you still believe that we are the fools, and not that you are expressing yourself poorly. We've had a similar character before – Wlk777, who also thought that everyone else was rude, but not him.
If you want to be listened to, you need to write differently and in a different style – minimum emotions, maximum analysis, links to trustworthy sources, constructive discussions on the subject matter, and not dismissals and throwing mud at each other, etc.
Сатир
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Ariputra, until you answer the question about neo-Nazis, no one will take you seriously. This is your last chance!!!!!!
R55Max
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Just reading, everyone loses to Arripu in arguments.
Once again, slowly and syllable by syllable - why do you write all this? Probably to bring the light of truth to lost souls.
Oh, how this got to you ) Well, it's very easy to hurt a proud person, even without meaning to.
Don't worry, I'm just as lost a soul as you are.
But it seems to me that you're very bothered by the fact that someone else's understanding of things, which doesn't match your established views of reality, might be correct. Because that would mean you've been wrong all this time. And that's a blow to your ego, it'll hurt. So you're defending yourself.
It's very simple why I write all this - because I'm interested in writing about it. It's easy and pleasant to write the truth.
Well, if you or anyone else disagrees with something - please, I have no objection. I'm not imposing my beliefs, just informing. Wicc
So, that format of presentation you chose is completely unsuitable for your purpose. The reasons have been pointed out to you repeatedly; I just added my two cents.
But I think it's a perfectly suitable format. Yet you're trying to pressure me and dictate what I should do and in what form.
I have no goal to convince or dissuade anyone; my goal is to inform. You disagree? Fine by me. Wicc
But apparently you still think that we are the fools, and not that you are presenting things poorly. We already had a character like that - Wlk777, who also thought everyone else was being rude, not him.
No, it seems you're the one who thinks everyone around you is a fool, and you're the only smart one. Everyone judges others by themselves ;-)
Do you really think no one else is capable of seeing the situation as correctly as you do?
And if someone's understanding of things doesn't match yours, then naturally it doesn't match reality either.
After all, how could such a great analyst ^^ as you be wrong. Wicc
If you want people to listen to you, you need to write different things in a different style - minimum emotions, maximum analysis, references to trustworthy sources, constructive debates on the merits of the issue, not dismissals and mudslinging, etc.
Why don't you go tell your wife what to do and how. I'll do what I think is necessary. If you disagree with something - please, I have no objection; you think differently - please, I have no objection.
First of all, someone who doesn't know for sure whether what they're being told corresponds to reality will, at the very least, not protest as emotionally as you do, but will try to find out if it's true or not. Or they simply won't react at all.
But you immediately started protesting, and quite emotionally at that. While also accusing an article that is extremely dry in terms of emotions of being emotional - http://rodonews.ru/news_1283520186.html. Although in this matter, the emotions are very understandable and explainable. It's about genocide, and extremely cruel and treacherous one at that.
Therefore, you are fully aware of the real state of affairs. About 89 million as of 2010, about GMOs, about vaccination, etc. And you are simply provocatively stirring things up, very skillfully at that. Well done.
Constructive debate :) ? What constructive debate can there be if you simply baselessly deny what doesn't match your understanding of things, or simply because you don't like it? You don't answer questions. What constructive debate or dialogue can there be considering that?
You play with words very skillfully, substitute concepts, turn everything upside down. I have no doubt that you know very well everything I am writing about.
There is a man named David Duke (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr876B6VlcA&playnext=1&list=PLE3BB342B9A80AC0A&feature=results_main) - who for decades has been exposing (or at least talking about) the crimes committed by Zionists around the world - who talks about the genocide of Serbs in Yugoslavia orchestrated by Zionists (well, it's not my fault that those who organized this genocide turned out to be Zionists; what does that have to do with me?), about the revolutions in Syria, Iraq, Egypt, Tunisia, Libya - which Israel organizes through the American army, about the genocide of the Russian people that has been systematically ongoing for almost 100 years.
It's no secret that Lenin (Blank), Trotsky (Bronstein), Stalin (Dzhugashvili), and Kirov, Zinoviev, Radek, Kamenev, Sverdlov - in short, it turns out that everyone who carried out the coup, the 1917 revolution - were Jews. Well, what does that have to do with me?
So, he also talks about how mail.ru, Yandex, Odnoklassniki, VKontakte, and the entire Russian internet belong to Jews, and are naturally controlled by them.
Almost all moderators, administrators - of all more or less major forums - are Jews. Well, this becomes clear along the way.
Besides the HeroesWorld forum, I also write on 6 other forums, on Odnoklassniki, on VKontakte, on www.goha.ru, etc. - the situation is the same everywhere (and it doesn't matter if I write this or someone else - the reaction is the same), as soon as you write something about Christ or the genocide of the Russian people, or about mass vaccinations, or GMOs, or about crimes committed by Jews, immediately 5-7-10 people appear who start vehemently opposing all of it. While providing no counterarguments. Not at all.
But when you write, for example, about egregious crimes committed by Russians, Belarusians, Ukrainians, Asians - there is no reaction, no protest, no sanctions from the administration [/B]
http://rodonews.ru/news_1283520186.html
60% of Russia's population has an average retirement age of 67 years.
You still haven't answered the question of why - on what basis do you consider this information - obviously false?
This information is confirmed by the data from the Russian Pension Fund.
Jews are certainly tough – the collapse of the state is obvious. What alternatives are there besides knowledge? Teacher, we're used to mistakes in words... At least sometimes observe punctuation. You're so literate!
