Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
So, is the idea of improving the state through artificial selection absurd?
As I understand it, in the context of this discussion about vaccinations, it translates to: "Vaccinations are a means of artificial selection to enhance citizens. Those who survive are noted, and those who don't... well, that's just the way it is." So, people are vaccinated with different vaccines from different manufacturers in different countries – choose whichever you like, it's a kaleidoscope. But against whom are they all being so effectively, uniformly, and persistently strengthened? Against imaginary enemies? Perhaps it's against diseases that are not biased and simply want to attack and finish off the unprepared? You, vaccinated adults, want to roll back the evolution of medicine as a science, based primarily on fears of unclear things and statistics of unfortunate incidents. Let's then re-derive the laws of physics, reinvent the wheel, and play the first Heroes game. Here's a cool and interesting article on the topic. Warning: contains profanity. I suggest starting with the "Holy War" section :D
What is Gardasil? Gardasil, produced by Merck, is an outer capsid protein of the virus, obtained from transgenic yeast (a genetically modified vaccine containing virus-like protein particles from HPV, inserted into yeast cells). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the United States warns: "Women who are allergic to yeast or any component of the vaccine should not receive Gardasil." Genetically modified products and the dangers of their delayed health effects are currently a hot topic among the general public. Other components of the vaccine include aluminum, sodium chloride, polysorbate, and sodium tetraborate (borax). These are also not safe for health, especially when administered to the body by injection. Aluminum, for example, along with lead, is classified as a highly hazardous substance according to sanitary standards. When it enters the body, it accumulates in long-lived cells, negatively affects the nervous and immune systems, and contributes to the development of Alzheimer's disease. Borax is used in the production of herbicides and detergents. An interesting and "beneficial" combination for the health of our girls and young women. The psychological trauma for girls during vaccination, related to learning about the intimate aspects of life, deserves separate attention.
As I understand it, in relation to this topic of vaccinations, it translates as: "Vaccinations are a means of artificial selection for upgrading citizens. We record who survives, and those who don't... well, that's just the way it is." So, people are vaccinated with the same vaccines from different manufacturers in different countries – choose whichever you want, it's a kaleidoscope. But against whom are all these efforts so consistently and persistently directed? Against imaginary enemies? Or perhaps against diseases that are not biased and simply want to attack and finish off the unprepared? You, vaccinated adults, want to roll back the evolution of medicine as a science, based primarily on fears of something unclear and statistics of unfortunate cases. Let's then re-derive the laws of physics, reinvent the wheel, and play the first Heroes game. Here is a cool and good article on the topic. Caution: contains profanity. I suggest starting with the "Holy War" section:D
First of all, such selection is a means of slowing down the overpopulation of the planet, which in turn is a global problem. Secondly, healthier people, both physically and mentally, and more intelligent people are capable of performing higher tasks, which in turn leads to the development of both the state and humanity as a whole. And evolution in medicine is nothing compared to biological evolution. And statistics are just an indicator of how a particular operation proceeds.
Message from Oelm Ariputra, everything you write is mostly superficial and rambling. And often outright fabrications.
The same can be said about you.
What you think about me doesn't interest me. Examples of demonstrably false evidence: The Dulles Plan, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, all sorts of quotes...
You're just living in your own world. By the way, a question about power... regarding the model of society.
Yes, about the power of the Jews. In two centuries after the start of slavery, Black people became presidents, ministers, and senators and play a full role in civil society. By claiming that the problem of the Slavs is that they are ruled by Freemasons, are you confirming that Black people are higher than Slavs on the evolutionary ladder of natural selection?
That's the point – we don't know anything about the vaccine; the "Judeo-Masons" are cannibals of the 21st century, and they skillfully exploit this.
Why are you talking if you don't know? And yes, bubonic plague affects no more than a few thousand people, and the mortality rate is 7%. Compared to what it was in medieval Europe, we can say that we have won the battle against this disease.
Other, less well-known cosmonauts tell stories about elephant corpses and human-like giants with wings. But this is not just not publicized; it is deliberately hushed up and suppressed.
Why is there no video?
Where do we go? Where do we end up when we save the world?
First of all, such selection is a means of slowing down the overpopulation of the planet, which in turn is a global problem.
Vaccinations appeared even when such a problem did not exist. However, in Russia and Ukraine, such a problem will not arise for a long time:( RiMpel2
Secondly, people who are healthier physically and mentally, and more intelligent, are capable of performing higher tasks, which in turn leads to the development of both the state and humanity as a whole.
Yes, vaccinations are a useful thing. RiMpel2
And evolution in medicine is nothing compared to biological evolution.
I didn't understand that. RiMpel2
And statistics are just an indicator of how a particular operation is progressing.
Yes. And?:confused: What is the argument about? Did you read the article?
Vaccinations appeared even when there wasn't such a problem. However, in Russia and Ukraine, such a problem won't arise for a long time:(
In Sparta, there wasn't such a problem either, but selection also occurred artificially. Will Russia not have such a problem for a long time? Go outside and count the number of migrants per square meter.
Yes, vaccinations are a useful thing.
Including those that kill. That's the point.
I didn't understand that.
It's like getting a place in a kindergarten. Just when your turn comes, the child is already finishing university.
Yes. And?:confused: What is the argument about? Did you read the article?
What are you trying to prove to me? That this method of artificial selection is absurd? I don't see that you've succeeded in doing that.
I'll bash Aripoutre again. Besides mixing up Slavs with dirt, he also doesn't know the history of the 20th century.
Let's reason logically from the perspective of a global Masonic conspiracy. Which country should become the main enemy of Jews worldwide, which should be humiliated and remain on its knees for the next 1000 years of its history? I think it's Germany, as the successor to the Nazis. But what is the reality?
I'll bash Ariputra again. Besides mixing Slavs with dirt, he also doesn't know the history of the 20th century.
Let's reason logically from the perspective of a global Masonic conspiracy. Which country should become the main enemy of Jews worldwide, which should be humiliated and remain on its knees for the next 1000 years of its history? I think it's Germany, as the successor to the Nazis. But what is the reality?
I might be repeating myself, but who takes Ariputra seriously?
Please, if there are any, identify yourselves.
Сейчас балуюсь этим https://vcmi.eu/download/ За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
I am trying, actually. Although it's not easy. For example, I would listen to something exclusive about Gardarika or Tartary (because it's really interesting), but instead, it's just rambling thoughts, Freemasons... and other nonsense.
I think the problem is that he can't quite live up to his image. He seems to want to enlighten people, but he's a bit weak, so that's why he's being ridiculed.
RiMpel2, for some reason, you see vaccinations as a means of artificial selection, rather than as a way to help the human body. I'm saying that's not the case. It seems that the very idea of artificial selection appeals to you, and you'll cling to it simply because you like it.
I don't see you succeeding in doing that.
I don't see it either, so I suggested you read the article. It has more arguments, a photo of the leader of the anti-vaccination movement, and lots of other things on the topic of vaccinations.
Well, why not? If a person survives after the vaccination, that's good. Maybe their offspring will be healthier too. But if they don't survive... well, that's their fate.
RiMpel2, for some reason, you see vaccinations as a means of artificial selection, rather than as a help to the human body. I'm saying that's not the case.
If a person can't handle the dose of vaccine and dies, is that helping the body? No, that's selection. But if they don't die and have a chance to get sick and survive in the future, then it's definitely a help. Or is it normal to kill a thousand to help another thousand? Vaccination has both sides, both selection and help. Although, help is identifying stronger individuals ;) Besides, to really find out if a vaccine has a positive effect, you need two absolutely identical organisms and conduct experiments with them. Unfortunately, even with cloning, you're unlikely to achieve complete identity.
I don't see it either, so I suggested reading the article. It has more arguments, a photo of the leader of the anti-vaccination movement, and lots of other stuff on the topic of vaccinations.
Ariputra at least links to quasi-scientific sources, but you're linking to something like a fairy tale land
Well, why not? If a person survives after the vaccination, that's good. Maybe their offspring will be stronger too. And if they don't survive... well, that's their fate.
I've already answered this, and there's no basis for reasoning like that in this case. But without vaccinations, the situation is as follows: a person survives without a vaccination – that's good. Maybe their offspring will be stronger too. And if they don't survive... well, that's their fate. And "that's their fate" will happen quite often.
Added 2 minutes later
Ariputra at least provides links to quasi-scientific sources, but you're just pulling things out of thin air.
Did you read it? There's even less chance that you would read it from serious encyclopedias.
If a person can't handle the dose of the vaccine and dies, is that helping the body? No, it's selection. But if they don't die and have a chance to get sick and survive in the future, then it's definitely a help. Or is it okay to kill a thousand to help another thousand?
Where? What thousands are dying? What's all the fuss about for no reason?
Added 45 seconds later Everything will be alright :)
Lim4
