Posts from Mafia 60. Nonsense, mayhem, and a few artifacts. Auto-translated

Hey, you have a negative status. After your words, there are two peaceful roles left for you, just like for Zubr. There are two roles left for both of you, if you want to be precise. If you are those roles, then there is one more peaceful role and a mafia member left among Vish/Sandro.

He's writing about it for the third time, even though the GM cleared me. lol
If you say that Zubr is messing up, then it turns out you're messing up too.

(Yes, I wrote with the letter "p", but the meaning is the same =_=.)

An attempt to remind myself, but I'm still being ignored.

By the way, the day is long over.
Is NNV coming out?

I gave you the quote from the description of the feature back then. You don't see many things in the game; just because I see more doesn't mean I'm the mafia.

"Suspicious" is not an accusation. An accusation is a vote, and I react to that. Why react to suspicions? I'm just glad if I'm not 100% safe; I'll live longer.

Honestly, I didn't read where you and Winner were accusing each other.

But if that's the case, then it will be easy for the Mafia to do it as a pair.

And you're happy about it. Or did you want to eliminate peaceful Nera?

Yes, but why did Pobeditel initially defend you? How do you explain that?

I never just throw votes at "suspicious" players. That's why I always just write about the suspiciousness of someone.

How could this be? You suspected throughout the game, even accused (!), but didn't even bother to thoroughly analyze your suspicions.

Oh, I'll repeat it again - there's no point in pushing someone as a Mafia member if no one is targeting them. It's just unnecessary suspicion.

The Bison and the Winner are good friends, and they both throw insults at me under the table.

Peaceful Nera – no. But I would gladly execute a Nera-mafia, which can’t even provide evidence.

Firstly, I doubted part of the game because I thought you were a peaceful couple, which is why I wrote that I believed in your peacefulness. Also, what's the point of analyzing my suspicions if no one is willing to engage in a dialogue? Plus, the fact is, I wasn't even at the computer on the second night, let alone the third. And now that I'm sure, I'm talking about it and fighting for myself and my words.

Also, what's the point of analyzing my suspicions if no one is willing to engage in a dialogue?

I've encountered many cases in psychological Mafia games where two Mafia members targeted each other, and in the end, they didn't even eliminate each other.

And if Koshe is to be believed, you two were working together to eliminate her, even though you were throwing accusations at each other.

He didn't even seem to accuse me. Only I accused him.

I'm open to dialogue with everyone.

So, will you answer the question: if we are a peaceful pair, why would I accuse him? It's understandable with the mafia, for a distraction, but why would a peaceful player do it.

A couple of posts ago, I was rambling, providing evidence without actually presenting proof. Maybe I just wrote those posts. When was the last time, in the last Revant mafia game, that I provided such evidence? I was exposing the Mafia (although it seemed like I was exposing the Town, but it turned out to be Mafia, but based on the posts, it was clear that the character was negative) and I was doing it correctly. How is the situation worse now?

A split vote happens often, but it's highly desirable to have a third person involved, otherwise it's just an unnecessary reveal. And a strong vote, especially on a key Mafia role, makes even less sense.

Provide me with proof of when you were there with me? (preferably with post numbers)

I'll answer again that I didn't read your accusations against him because I decided to just skim through a huge number of posts. And only posts with bold text stopped me.

Well, at least because I'm not Mafia. And I haven't even read Revan's Mafia story, so it's a rather dubious argument.

I won't answer anything about this. I have never used this tactic, and I don't remember if a third participant was needed or not. Besides, your voice wasn't even on it. And you can always just throw out a "suspicion."