Posts from Турнир "ФБ-6" -> Tournament "The Final Battle - 6"

So, giving out rewards in the seasonal league, but not in the tournament? Is winning a prestigious tournament more important than the seasonal league? What kind of nonsense is that? And what is the price of such a victory then – what has this game become?! There's a generally unhealthy trend – the tournament is the be-all and end-all, and that's not right, comrades. Victory should be heroic and noble!

So, you're saying it's okay to give out rewards in the regular season but not in a tournament? Is winning a prestigious tournament more important than the regular season? What kind of nonsense is that? And what, then, is the value of such a victory in this game? There's a generally unhealthy trend: the tournament becomes the be-all and end-all, and that's not right, comrades. Victory should be heroic and noble!

Do you understand what nonsense you wrote? You're putting fun games and tournaments on the same level. For example, I wouldn't play a fun game until 5 a.m. when I have to be at work at 8, but I would play a tournament, and I did that yesterday. Unfortunately, the generator doesn't possess a sense of nobility.

It's clear that the game starts with restarts.
In general, as I understand it, restarts are given so that you can play out some acceptable layout. One thing I don't understand is why people post wins at 111. To save time, out of fear of losing with a different layout, or for something else?

On the matter at hand - I didn't choose Jebus Cross

As an option, by agreement, you could give each player a restart, and accordingly consider that Pyotr used his restart.
I've managed to get out of a similar difficult situation this way a couple of times.
But in general, playing a decisive game on Jebus Cross, and even with random towns, is an extremely poor choice.

Kilgor, it is you who misunderstood me — I am saying: what is the value of such tournament victories, especially since a tournament win does not yet prove the heavenly skill of the winner... I will say my opinion once again — any victory, be it a tournament or a fun game, must be convincing, and moreover, the winner must be determined on the battlefield, not on a block on 111. I see the situation like this: a person objectively did not see his own development, i.e., he predictably assumed the impossibility of resisting and playing for victory — he notified his opponent of this. Stupid advice such as: took Tactics, upgraded Harpies (which still needed to be built), built the Eye — this is absolute nonsense — we all know the Dungeon building tree — but the essence of Jebus is not to grind it for 3 days breaking through this block... It's a pity that the opponent did not hear his vis-à-vis... would have given a restart — and after the game we could have discussed this hand and made a worthy decision satisfying both... Skill from such a tournament victory will definitely not grow... the "spirit of despondency" hovers over such a victory...

I also don't understand how you can put fun games in the same category as tournaments. You play fun games just to play, so you can have auto-saves and restart the game 100 times. But in a tournament – I'm sorry, that's not the case.

Not granting an auto-win due to a misclick or real-life distractions is the deepest disrespect toward your opponent. As is contesting a victory after such autos. IMHO, of course.