Posts from Favorites in battle! - 5 The Battle of Favorites! - 5

...thanks to Pit for LM that allowed my participation in this tournament.Thank you all for warm welcome and good luck to all players in next stage of tournament.See you on some of next tournaments.

And a month and a half later, already after the group stage, it turns out that there are problems with Javdet and kalababa regarding agreements on matches. Where were you before? Why didn't you contact me?
.

He is Bulgarian, participating in a tournament for the first time, his English and Russian are non-existent, his sense of humor is peculiar, I have been communicating with him for about a year and I barely understand him.
Doesn't speak Russian? Inadequate? Emojis? Delays? None of this is stated in our rules. Roman, what can I do for you? Ban him from communicating with you in chat?

Alone


I'll join my teammates in my assessment of Belqzaniq's adequacy. This character has repeatedly messed with me regarding the timing of preliminary agreements. He could promise to play tomorrow, but then show up a week later. I've written about this many times in this thread – that a teammate disappeared, etc. I think he's not a child and doesn't need someone to explain things for him. He has never apologized for breaking agreements or given explanations. On the contrary, he would start with a brief greeting, "Hi," and the second phrase would be: "Are we playing, or have I won?" Once, it might pass as a joke, but constantly, even during the game, is too much. We need to draw conclusions and not allow him to participate in tournaments in the future.



I also suggest giving him a chance – to make a firm agreement about the timing of the game, and if he doesn't show up, then... If he leaves after 5 minutes of play, you decide... but I have a definite opinion – ban him. We need to respect our opponents, whether you're Bulgarian or someone else. These are my two constructive (I think) ideas. :)

Well, now I'm also somehow to blame...

Group I.
Dawidu91 - BlooDy)DriVeR 0-1, technical win due to Dawidu91 refusing to continue.
1. twaryna Fortress
2. BlooDy)DriVeR Necropolis, decided in a personal meeting with StickyFingaz (both have the same King's Bounty rating).

But here, doesn't the tech issue create a problem?

Thank you too, see you.

Group O
1. PReDS Inferno
2. bRitvo4kA Stronghold

Group I.
Dawidu91 - BlooDy)DriVeR 0-1, technical loss due to Dawidu91's refusal to continue.
1. twaryna Fortress
2. BlooDy)DriVeR Necropolis, based on a personal meeting with StickyFingaz (same KB)

Regarding match-fixing agreements.
Yes, agreements happen in almost every tournament with groups or a Swiss system. The organizers are absolutely powerless to influence this. It's impossible to forbid, force people to play / play at full strength. Even if the organizer sits and watches the stream, there's nothing easier than, after all resets, to throw the game and surrender. Any bans and rules will lead to deception, and that's even worse.
But there is a remedy for players - you just need to win all your games, then no agreements will stop you.

Specifically - Group P.
Let's take VanjaM - GoedenDag 1-0 (technical).
Options for OUTLAW - darkello:
- 0-1 - darkello advances from 1st place, OUTLAW from 2nd;
- 0.5-0.5 - OUTLAW advances from 1st place, darkello from 2nd;
- 1-0 - OUTLAW advances from 1st place; Oelm, VanjaM, darkello each get 2 points with the same KB - 2.
Head-to-head results also give nothing. The next criterion - technical wins, VanjaM loses out here with a technical win from GoedenDag, i.e. this agreement is precisely disadvantageous for VanjaM. Then the head-to-head meeting is already in favor of Oelm, and it is he who advances from 2nd place. VanjaM needed to play and win against GoedenDag; then these three players would have ended up in tiebreaker games.
The first option is disadvantageous for OUTLAW, the last for darkello, so it's completely natural that they chose a draw.
I repeat, the organizers can in no way influence this or similar situations.

1. OUTLAW Rampart
2. darkello Conflux

Next, my favorite Group J.
The replacement of PlayHeroes_HP Fortress -> Belqzaniq was made on October 17.
Right away I was informed that some players had complaints against him, and he is banned on WCL.
Why is he banned? I have no information from Sag-; the complaints are not stated in Belqzaniq's profile; the only explanation I managed to obtain is account cloning. Belqzaniq himself explained this to me as having forgotten his password. For creating a clone on WCL, I cannot disqualify a player from the tournament on HW. There are clones galore there. We don't even disqualify our own clones (you yourselves saw directly in Favorites Herosna and RomaN, also a forgotten password). And in the season, one of our players even played under 4 accounts.
The next complaint - in his opponent's stream, it was visible how he threw the game, and then he said his internet went down. Well, and I personally had this happen in this tournament - I saw with my own eyes how my opponent threw the game on ГО, then he disappeared from ICQ, and then he said his power flickered. And strangely enough, I believe him 100%.
If anyone has proper evidence of unfair play, please submit it to me in a private message, I will pass the facts on to the AC (groundless accusations of unfair play on the forum are prohibited; all such cases are handled by the AC in a closed section; otherwise, enormous damage may be done to the reputation of an innocent person). And the words "one player said", "I was tipped off and told" I cannot attach to the case.

Now, what happened in this group.
Alone tipped me off and asked me to contact Belqzaniq. We got in touch via Hamachi.
The stream viewers discovered Belqzaniq's use of the Objects.txt text file. Yes, I looked at the saves, indeed, it was there. Alone received a technical win. Belqzaniq deleted the text file, said he used it out of ignorance, and apologized.
Nestor86 had no problems. They got in touch, played, Nestor86 was the host. I specifically asked Nestor86 about complaints - no, there were no complaints.
And a month and a half later, after the group stage had already ended, it turns out that there are problems with an agreement for games involving Javdet and kalababa. Well, where were you before? Why didn't you contact me? I never had any problems contacting him. I would have set a time, tracked player attendance. But as it is now - whether we're waiting on ICQ, or Skype, or the VK chat, well, I communicated with him on Facebook, watched a piece of his stream of the game with Javdet. Well, you need to do everything in a timely and civilized manner. Roman and Sergey, you are not beginners; do you really need to be taught how to behave in such cases?
He is Bulgarian, participating in a tournament for the first time, his English and Russian are zero, his sense of humor is peculiar, I've been communicating with him for about a year and I barely understand him.
He doesn't speak Russian? Inadequacy? Smileys? Postponements? None of this is stipulated in our rules. Roman, what can I do for you? Ban him from chatting with you?

Overall, there are very many complaints from players about the difficulty of agreeing on a game time during the tournament. And this concerns not only Belqzaniq. If we were to disqualify a player from the tournament for every such complaint, 1/4 of our players would be out immediately. Not everyone "knows how" to negotiate, especially our newcomers and newcomers to our forum, who came from other resources. I won't point fingers.

In every tournament I write: "inform me about problems." If I have no information from you, or to my question "how are things?" I get the answer "dunno", then I can't do anything.

In connection with the fact that the situation in Group J is very complicated, and it needs to be resolved, I propose the simplest solution - try to finish the game Javdet - Belqzaniq. I'll try to contact Belqzaniq today. And a request to Javdet and kalababa - move the discussion to private messages. I'll be on ICQ and Skype today, let's think about what to do next.

yarzapp(stronghold, Gundula, Crag Hack) def Gondza(castle, Valesca, Monere), jebus XL, 131

The map was strange (about 8 pandoras - 80 goblins, 50 wolves, 30 ogres, some exp and all earth magic). Dwells generally sucked (1 bird, 2 wolves, 1 goblin, 1 ork), 3 hives (lucky - 28 wyves), 1 cons (2 angels). Had book of earth and shield +4 all in my zone, which was big and finally I was preparing to break at 131, then in 127 opponent killed my Gundula with 2 angels (fortunately without artifacts) then took my town. He had 6 angels, 4 wyverns and 10 marksmen. I attacked him in my town with 7 lvl Crag (no spell book), there would be a problem if he would destroy my catapult so I had a great problem (he casted mass haste and mass slow). One time opponent made crucial mistake, when he attacked my birds with waited angel after moral, so all my units could kill him.
Thanks for a game, it was fun ;-)

I no longer feel like playing as that faction.