Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from - Comparison of creatures from Heroes 5 with creatures in Heroes 3.
Which heroes make the creatures look more impressive?
163
voters
Single choice
Public votes
Sign in to participate in this poll.
Poll results will be visible after you vote or when the poll closes.
-=SecaS=-
Auto-translated
No, guys, I disagree with you. The graphics in the fifth installment of Heroes of Might and Magic are better, while in the third, they are weaker. That's why the creatures in the fifth game look cooler and more convincing!
Gremlin From Kremlin
Auto-translated
I like the creatures from Heroes of Might and Magic III more.
нонстоп
Auto-translated
Cool topic.
For me, they look more convincing in the third game.
If I'm playing, I can't help but admire them.
For example, in the swamp. The voice acting. Mmm. The atmosphere... You can see that other creatures can't live here. Images of lizard hunters with bows immediately flash through my mind, snakes flying overhead at the speed of sound, etc. You enter a castle, and you admire each one.
Launch any other city. Everywhere, in every unit, you can feel life.
In the fifth game, it's not quite the same.
But I liked the golem from the fifth game. Perhaps not so much him, but his attack.
Ghosts are simply amazing in the fifth game! In the third, they really are just rags. But still, there's something beautiful about them in the third game.
I guess I'm just not meant to understand mages and genies in the fifth game.
The genies immediately reminded me of the game: Battletoads.
And the mages are kind of like hobgoblins.
But Rakshasa is great. Especially with the mod where their torso is human.
In general, for me, the units are more convincing in the third game.
Ment
Auto-translated
I'm already used to the third installment, as I play it more often, so I have no complaints about it. In the fifth part, some creatures are not very well designed, but others, on the contrary, are quite original and unusual. So, both parts are good. But I'm more inclined towards the third one in this case.
well, they look great in both parts, but even better in the fifth (mostly due to the graphics). This is just my personal opinion. I don't want to argue with anyone. Peace to all.))
Делай сегодня то, что другие не хотят — завтра будешь жить так, как другие не могут.
soldierx
Auto-translated
I remember playing Final Fantasy 9 and seeing a gargoyle there, just like in the fifth game. The developers of Heroes of Might and Magic 5 stole the creature design.
Sinistar
Auto-translated
I prefer the creatures from the third game. Although they are less "technologically advanced," they are much more stylish.
Цвета ночи гранитные склоны, Цвета крови сухая земля, И янтарные очи дракона Отражает кусок хрусталя - Я сторожу этот клад...
Liiion
Auto-translated
In my opinion, the creatures look convincing in both the fifth and third installments. Some creatures are drawn better in the third than in the fifth, and some creatures are drawn better in the fifth. Each has its own advantages. Overall, I prefer the detailing in the third, and the animation in the fifth.
Roman2211
Auto-translated
The creatures in Heroes of Might and Magic V are very different from those in Heroes of Might and Magic III; I simply didn't recognize them, which is one of the reasons I uninstalled the fifth installment. Another reason for uninstalling was the 3D graphics.
Раптор
Auto-translated
It's hard to compare, but I personally prefer the ones from the third game. Although the fifth game has excellent unit animations, especially for Liches.
Regarding similarities and differences:
Gargoyles – they look good in both games.
Zombies – they will be worse in the fifth game.
Vampires – in the third game, they look too menacing.
Hydras – the third game wins.
Джаред
Auto-translated
In the 3rd part, the creatures look more convincing; I voted for the 3rd part.
Spectral
Auto-translated
In the third game, the creatures are more realistic, although in the fifth game, the graphics are much better, but these are incomparable things.
However, some elements in the fifth game appeal to me more. For example, golems. Although they look fragile and shake, they are still a mechanism, and it is clear that it is working. If you've noticed, a car with the engine running also shakes a little (although it varies).
Angels are also much better, while in the third game, they are just unkempt men with wings. But demons, on the other hand, look like real hellspawn in the third game, and they even beckon with their finger. And in the fifth game, they are just bipedal, large horned cattle. As for genies, gargoyles, zombies, and elementals, I have no comment. I agree with most people.
Создается карта про эльфов: Воссоединение - готовность 71%
cenobit
Auto-translated
In my opinion, the third game is more realistic.
Eleondor
Auto-translated
a trio rules the world) because this is a CLASSIC!)