Posts from Favorites in battle! - 5 The Battle of Favorites! - 5

A lot of words that mean nothing. In reality, I didn't insist on giving you a second Castle. After you refused, I concluded that his words and actions don't match (he himself said that "if you don't have time to rearrange or a hero with a mod runs away without an army, write to me"), which is what I told him directly. Given the power, stats, and artifacts, no arrangement would have helped, so all this fuss smells like hypocrisy.

I won't even mention the fact that there were no battle scrolls.

It's not even about whether you were obligated to give me something in that situation; it's about whether you were willing to do so. Do you see the difference?

I apologize, but it looks strange from the outside: to sign up for a tournament, play a match, and then start talking about how the rules are wrong and how they need to be changed.

The rules were known from the beginning; anyone could read them in the first post, and they shouldn't change during the tournament.

Otherwise, it's just a circus.

And what for? Whether he was ready or not. Why? So that Ariputra himself would graciously refuse after the offer? Your account of events makes it hard to believe in your sincerity. In my opinion, it's not worth mentioning autosaves; the rest is secondary.

Or is it just to show off how noble I am?

- if a person demands something from someone, then they should naturally be ready to do the same – that’s my logic in this case.

And in general, I try to answer each of your questions, and quite thoroughly, so that no hidden meaning is embedded in the words (form), but you haven’t answered even 100 of my questions asked in the forum.

+100500. What a fun situation. This guy has played on the forum for quite some time. And then he found out about the rules of online games that he was playing :D. Very amusing. Keep it up :D.

No changes will be made to the rules of the tournament. In general, it's funny to not know the rules, but to suggest a bunch of changes to them.

Auto-giving is a personal matter for everyone. This auto-giving does not obligate either the giver or the receiver. And, in my opinion, it has nothing to do with the concept of "nobility". It's especially funny when someone who "nobly" gave an auto-give later "nobly" demands a reward for it. And it's also quite amusing to "nobly" demand an auto-give, accusing someone of a lack of "nobility".

What the heck, what kind of nonsense is this :D? Is there even one person on this forum who reads Ariputa's long posts? :D

Yes, you clearly have a "moneylender's" position. Lend "100 rubles" and then mention it at every opportunity. Faith has nothing to do with it here.

If you were actually interested, you would have found such discussions in the "history".

First, the ideology of "freebies" isn't too attractive for good players. Second, comparisons with 4th-level specialists are incorrect. This leniency was made to slightly strengthen the role of mages in the game. Allowing scrolls is just adding a lucky-card. Third, this will lead to "bloating" of the rules — if using an Inferno scroll can still be accepted, then a free clone for Galtran, resurrect for Shakti, not to mention transport spells, are completely unappealing.

04.10.12 Sanin (Blue, Tower, Nila) def JustObserver (Red, Dungeon, Shakhti) Jebus Cross 113

We chose all restarts. What ended up being dealt was much worse than what I restarted before. For the entire respawn: three Dragon Fly Hives, two Griffin Conservatories, and external dwellings of gremlins. There's hardly anyone to fight in the first week. I plan to collect resources, build up, upgrade gremlins on the second week, and then start actively rotating Jabarkas. The plan is weak, but there's no other. However, the opponent somehow throws the game, and thanks for that. The respawn there is much richer; I would hardly be able to counter anything.