+100500. What a fun situation. This guy has played on the forum for quite some time. And then he found out about the rules of online games that he was playing :D. Very amusing. Keep it up :D.

злонаравие, how sweet it is, right?
but what is nectar at the beginning becomes poison at the end, and vice versa.

No changes will be made to the rules of the tournament. In general, it's funny to not know the rules, but to suggest a bunch of changes to them.

Pit, you're doing the same thing. Where does it say that I want to make changes to the rules of the tournament? I just shared my thoughts and logic on one of the rules, with the goal of possibly discussing them in the future. That's all.

I know the rules, or at least I thought I knew them. When I was playing, I had a well-established idea that scrolls could be used in PvE without GM approval, so I didn't even look at the rules about it or ask anyone. If I had any doubts, I would definitely have asked, for example, Gomunguls or Dirty Player, Scorpions.

in light of this, I am ready to reconsider the results of other tournament games with Shamys in "one for all".

Auto-giving is a personal matter for everyone. This auto-giving does not obligate either the giver or the receiver. And, in my opinion, it has nothing to do with the concept of "nobility". It's especially funny when someone who "nobly" gave an auto-give later "nobly" demands a reward for it. And it's also quite amusing to "nobly" demand an auto-give, accusing someone of a lack of "nobility".

demanding a reward? I'm saying it again, I don't care about this draw at all. The task was to see if the person is willing to give what he "demanded" from me before, or not.

What the heck, what kind of nonsense is this :D? Is there even one person on this forum who reads Ariputa's long posts? :D

another whiner from the "can't handle it" club :D

well, if you don't like it, if you don't agree, you can always not read it, so why whine about it every time?