Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Favorites in battle! - 5
The Battle of Favorites! - 5
Has SoD (Sword of Destiny) been rid of the "buggy" auto-battle feature, and if so, how often is the corrected auto-battle used today?
It wasn't really used in SoD anyway, because the consequences could be quite dire, unlike in WOT (War of the Throne), where the results could be reversed. Although, I think this is more of a rhetorical question. Nevertheless, it seems that attention was focused on the progressive features of WOT. And the idea of completely eliminating bugs was also declared. Only time will tell. Medium_HP
How can a reversible auto-battle save you from unpleasant guards, and with an efficiency comparable to a guillotine?
The mechanism of the buggy quick battle is described in detail. Based on this, you can create the effectiveness of your combat formations. And it just so happened that I overestimated myself, thinking that I could find a connection to the guillotine. But the point was about your suggestion to use WOT as a way to solve problems. You took a very broad approach, I must say. And Dr. Pavlov is in the same vein... (No, but it's not WOT that produces linearity in reasoning, is it?) Well, anyway, this is all far from the topic.
Isn't it possible to simply enter the game alone and click "restart scenario"?:D
I don't think so, because if the map isn't in the folder, a normal restart won't be possible. rebellious
You probably missed something or overlooked it (in the mod's topic). This is especially relevant in the context of the upcoming version, which will implement closing the game if someone goes offline.
This isn't really a good thing. In this case, you won't be able to check if an opponent has rage-quit and pressed Alt+F4. Sanin
The distribution into brackets isn't random; it's based on the organizers' assessment of each player's skill (I'm surprised, for example, that Tvarina ended up in the second bracket, and Amila in the third – if I understand the principle of group formation correctly, that's how it was). The distribution into groups isn't random; it's done so that the castles don't repeat.
The distribution into brackets shouldn't be random. It's done to maintain a balance of power within the group. However, the fact that the castles don't repeat in the groups surprises me. When I drew the lots for the previous favorites, I ended up with a group where 4 out of 5 were Ramparts, and I think that's perfectly normal. I don't understand where the stereotype came from that you can't play with the same castles. :confused:
Hermit
Auto-translated
It’s great that all the castles are different. I don’t really like playing with identical castles. But it will be very difficult for me to leave the group…
When I was drawing groups for the previous favorites tournament, I ended up with a group where 4 out of 5 were Ramparts, and I think that's normal. It's unclear where the stereotype came from that you can't play with the same Castle. :confused:
In my opinion, the idea of the tournament is to determine which Castle is the very best... not who among the players is better at playing as Rampart. That’s why we separated identical Castles into different groups. Playing with the same Castle is an idea for a completely different tournament, for example: "Elves, to battle!" And everyone plays only as Rampart, figuring out who will be the king of dwarves and elves.
Regarding player sHoocK13. He is not banned on HW. As of today, he is banned on WCL.
sHoocK13 needs to resolve this issue with SAG. If SAG unbans him, we will add him to the Favorites list.
The judges of the "Favorites" tournament have nothing to do with this, but we cannot include in the tournament a player who has been banned on another resource for unfair play.
The distribution into tiers is not random, but based on the organizers' assessment of each player's skill (I was surprised, for example, that Tvarina ended up in the second tier, and Amila in the third.
The organizers' assessment of player skill is primarily based on how players performed in previous tournaments. And as Tvarina showed in the Fb tournament, it's possible to come in first place even from the 5th tier. Naturally, there are players with high skill in the second tier who should have been in the first, but there are only 16 spots, and there are also many players who should have been in the 2nd tier... And in the 4th and 5th tiers, there are also players who are far from weak! In other words, everything is in your hands – play and win!
I ended up with a group where 4 out of 5 are Ramparts, and I think that's fine. It's unclear where the stereotype came from that you can't play with the same Castle type. :confused:[/QUOTE] It's just that in the playoffs, there were 2 fewer Ramparts, but otherwise, everything is normal.
Oelm
Auto-translated
What happened to Schook13? In general, the accusation of taking unfair restarts sounds strange.
found a problem with Hama, it's in Avast IS, but couldn't fix it. Anyone with IS who managed to solve this, please help this clumsy and lazy guy:D
The problem is different - Hama released some new version, and errors started to appear - Hama doesn't launch. I completely uninstalled it and took an old version of Hama from my archive. During its installation, when asked if I want to use the found settings, I answered no, and now everything is fine.
Oelm, how many posts do you leave in each topic? It's impossible to know everything... do you really need it? Don't worry, if I manage to play with you, I'll catch you ;).. if someone cheats. And in general, you should focus on improving your personal relationships, someone is already confessing their love to you, and you...Satir
Even though you're an old, fat, useless troll, I still love you :)
:D
Дипломатия - искусство говорить собаке "хорошая собачка" до тех пор пока не найдешь подходящую палку.
Oelm
Auto-translated
Let's start:
29.09.2012 Group P. Oelm(barbarian, Tyraxor, Tyraxor) def darkello(conflux, Ciele, Aenain), disbalance, 126
I was pleased with the blacksmith, I suspected that my opponent had little experience with the template, especially playing as conflux. I took red on restarts. The roads were fast, I found the wolf dwelling. Tyraxor collected the money, by the end of the week I found another wolf dwelling far away, captured two secondary towns, a portal in the dungeon, orcs+ruins at home in the citadel. On 121 I awkwardly took a naga bank at level 4, took 4 birds instead of 5, which affected losses, ending up with 14 wolves and 2 birds lost. I camped there. On 122 I checked the Griffin Conservatory with a scout — a level 2 on grass, I ran with my main hero to the GO on a thunderbird. Kreag level 1 with 114 wolves took out the griffins with a few losses. Tiras wiped out a bunch of dragons after checking with GS, all wolves survived, I camped at the hive. Dessa, already running 2700+, took a box of 70 zombies, I captured the necropolis castle in the center, ran with my main hero to the hives. On 125 I broke through 37 warunners, Grechkin came to the tavern, I greased the zombies. And I cleared the guard from two hives. I was about to take everything and level Gretchina's pathfinding because of the sand, the opponent surrendered.
The judges of the "Favorites" tournament have nothing to do with this, but we cannot include a player who has been banned on another resource for unfair play in the tournament.
I'm generally not against it, but... then why was he included in "One for All"?
29.09.2012 Group P. Oelm(barbarian, Tyraxor, Tyraxor) def darkello(conflux, Ciele, Aenain), disbalance, 126
I was pleased with the draft, I suspected my opponent had little experience with the template, especially with Conflux. I took red after restarts. Fast roads, found a wolf dwelling. Tyrex pays for himself, by the end of the week I found another wolf dwelling far away, captured two secondary towns, in the dungeon a portal, at home orcs + rocs in the citadel. On 121 I awkwardly take a naga bank with 4, got 4 birds instead of 5, which affected losses, total I come out without 14 wolves and 2 birds. I camp there for the night. On 122 I check the Griffin Conservatory with a scout hero - a two-hex on grass, my main runs to the GO on a thunderbird. Crag, level 1 with 114 wolves, takes out griffins losing a few. Tiras smashes a bunch of dragons after a GS check, all wolves alive, I camp at a hive. Deesa, already running 2700+, takes a chest with 70 zombies, I capture a necro castle in the center, my main runs to the hives. On 125 I break through 37 war dwarves, in the tavern Gretchin shows up, I bless the zombies, and clear the guard from two hives. I plan to take everything and give Gretchin pathfinding because of the sand, opponent surrenders.
Thanks.
P.S. Cap, shut up.
I couldn't overcome 70 blessed rocs at the GO so early, that's why I surrendered, there were no wolves at all, nor any Griffin Conservatories
In my opinion, the idea of the tournament is to determine which castle is the very best, and not to see who among the players is better at playing as Rampart.
I think you're wrong. Everyone intuitively understands which castles are strong. The original idea of the tournament was to play with your favorite castle, which is constantly being excluded. Hence the name "favorites." If this tournament had a good prize pool, we would see a completely different lineup, and it would be unlikely to make it so that there would be no repetition of castles in the groups.
This is just my IMHO, and the point is that there is nothing wrong with playing with the same castles. Nestor86
There were just 2 fewer Ramparts in the playoffs, but otherwise everything is fine.
It's better for them to be eliminated this way than for them all to make it to the playoffs. :D
Oelm
Auto-translated
Kostya, sorry, I didn't understand your point.
The initial idea of the tournament was to play with your favorite faction, which is constantly being excluded.
So, either with your favorite, or with the one that's being excluded. In my opinion, it wouldn't be great if, for example, a strong player playing Rampart kept getting matched with only Ramparts in the group stage, then in the playoffs, and so on throughout the tournament, which is, by the way, a slightly exaggerated version of your suggestion.