Posts from Mafia 55. Star Wars: Clone Wars

When was the last time I made jokes while playing as Dungeon? o_O I think I only make jokes when playing as Haven now, so people like you don't judge my behavior :p

You were only focusing on one piece of evidence and one role.

I would have immediately paid attention to other clues about him, and not just on the third attempt, or at least noted them as possible, but I would have written that they don't appeal to me for one reason or another.

when it turns out that Ment is really not Savage, then you can nod wisely and say "well, I told you! You should have listened to me!"

It's simple: I focused on this clue and this role because the leak of Ment started based on this very clue.

You overestimate me :3 I'm not that experienced in this kind of mafia game to analyze everything right away. But this not very obvious clue that led to the leak caught my eye, and I decided to express my opinion that not everything might be so simple. That's all © ^^

I can only say that if Ment was a peaceful resident. But if he turns out to be a mafia member, I won't be able to say anything - I'll be very quickly and unanimously leaked -___-"

You'll make it.

What does that change?

No, it doesn't change anything when a Mafia member is eliminated, because you were actually defending him and pretending to doubt.

They won't "eliminate" him, they'll "eliminate" him. And yes, I will be the first in those ranks. Now.

I believe that a statement like, "Noble lords, let's not rush and think about it again, let's see if anyone else fits the description of 30.10," is not a defense, but a constructive suggestion. It implies that if no new ideas emerge on this matter, then Ment should be hanged as the most obvious suspect.
And yes, I didn't pretend to doubt =[/quote] That's how you wrote it; it gives the impression of a defense. Moreover, you pretended because you didn't offer any alternative options. I've already explained the reason for this.
If you were peaceful and genuinely doubted the logic of others' conclusions, you would have thought about it and probably found some of your own. Otherwise, you would have nodded and agreed. At least, that's what seems logical to me.
You simply threw out the thesis, "the evidence is too weak, you're executing him for nothing," and that's it. You didn't develop the thought further. Only after Rimple and I drew attention to this did you start providing other facts. And even then, not immediately, but trying to withhold information for as long as possible.

It's a good move to attack a newbie. For the mafia :3

P.S. On my forum, "to frame" and "to hang" meant the same thing. Do you have a different meaning for these words?

A good move is to target a newbie.

It's a possible option, but I wouldn't do something so obviously revealing – I do have some experience playing Mafia (even if not on this forum) :3

Moreover, he pretended, because he didn't offer any other options.

For example, there are many events listed in the wiki that happened on this day. I tried to match some of them with the players' profiles, but I didn't find any obvious similarities.

If you were peaceful and genuinely doubted the logic of others' conclusions, you would have thought about it and probably found some of your own. Otherwise, you would have nodded and agreed.

You started giving other facts.

Is this your main argument?

And you're contradicting yourself, because you yourself wrote that you're not a newbie and have a lot of experience playing.

In my opinion, "to сливать" means to wrongly accuse an innocent person.

For clarity:

You're overestimating me :3 I'm not that experienced in this type of Mafia game to analyze everything right away.

I suggested using the wiki and seeing if any event that happened on that day could be linked to one of the players.

What kind of facts are you talking about? I think you're deliberately twisting my words – you say I didn't offer any alternatives, then you accused Ment of being a maniac, and then you defended him. Strange shifts in opinion, don't you think?

Are you talking about "the ace" and the word "cards" in Ment's signature? Or did you somehow link "sociopath" to his profile?

That's not an argument. And I'm not accusing you of being a Mafia player, but your behavior is very strange to me.

On the contrary, I did write that I have experience playing Mafia, but I am a novice on your forum and in the game of Mafia with clues. Isn't that right?

Okay, I'll keep in mind the peculiarity of your jargon. I meant simply killing someone in a vote :3

You forgot to add (of course, not to discredit me, right?) this quote:

This isn't a suggestion; it's just empty words. I could write the same thing without even looking at the Wiki. You just pretended to be searching for something.

started mentioning other clues.

Water

Are you saying you don't have experience playing
Mafia with clues?

And what does the forum have to do with it? The basic principles of the game don't change.

For you, it's nothing, but for me, it's not. I at least tried to think differently. As I wrote, I didn't find any connections in the Wiki, but that doesn't mean they don't exist. I might have missed something, or I might have been wrong with my assumption. But I tried to do something. I'll keep in mind that you don't like initiative =[/QUOTE]
How does this relate to this?

I only decided to try other clues on Ment after your post. The analogy with the maps was the first thing that came to my mind, nothing more.

I'll keep in mind that you don't like initiative =[/QUOTE]
Initiative is good, a sensible, peaceful initiative. If you dig, dig to the end, don't just pretend.
And I appreciate your activity, at least you're not hiding. It's a pity that the investigations really are Mafia-like.

Yes, this is my third game with clues. Moreover, the first one was a hybrid - it had both clues and quents. The second game was the one that was linked in this thread, on the 1C forum. And both of them differed from yours in that free communication was allowed. So, this is the first time I'm playing this kind of Mafia.

The principles don't change, but the attitude towards unfamiliar people is different than towards players you already know, whose playing style you already know and understand what to expect from them, and what is unlikely. Newcomers are unpredictable, and they are usually treated with caution. That's all :3

Let me clarify a couple of points right away: Padmé won't recognize the name of Anakin's killer.