Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Mafia: general discussions.Auto-translated
? :) Only 3 people lowered my BD. Why so weak? x) And seriously, I thought that when I came back, the game would already be over. Let's keep up the pace. I want to pew-pew droids in the Winner's Mafia!
I think it would be better to make the game end when someone has the most votes, rather than waiting until more than half of the votes are cast. That way, there will be more competition, activity, and so on during the day.
Winner, maybe you could leave just one "maniac" in the game, like you did before. Otherwise, there will be a lot of shooting at night, and it will be unclear during the day who to target. And as always, most of the game will end up happening at night.
Отдай свои прошлые сны, В сомненьях себя обрети, В бешеном танце душа кружится! Не думай, что будет потом, Здесь и сейчас мы живем, Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!
I think it would be better to make the hanging decision based on who gets the most votes, rather than requiring a majority. That way, there will be more competition, activity, and so on during the day.
I don't mind, but I'm worried that in that case, the Mafia might be able to hang someone themselves. Let's keep the number of Mages at two. I'll think about it and maybe add protection for someone else.
I don't mind, actually, but I'm afraid that in this case, the Mafia will be able to eliminate someone on their own. Let there be two Mages. I'll think about it and maybe add protection to someone else.
Let them eliminate someone if they can. After all, a hint about who will be eliminated is given, and secondly, the townspeople will be more responsible with their votes.
Отдай свои прошлые сны, В сомненьях себя обрети, В бешеном танце душа кружится! Не думай, что будет потом, Здесь и сейчас мы живем, Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!
I'm in favor of the old rule. With the current rule regarding votes, it's impossible to properly ban anyone; everyone distributes their votes among a bunch of candidates, and it's just a mess. And in general, it's illogical when a minority can determine the outcome of the vote. If inactivity is a concern, it's better to tighten the rules for inactive users, up to a limit on the minimum number of posts per day and a ban on voting "No New Votes" for more than two days in a row.
Due to the rule regarding abstentions, it’s practically impossible to eliminate anyone; everyone distributes their votes among a bunch of candidates, so it’s just some kind of nonsense.
Eliminating someone is actually easier. Ideally, it should be done without abstentions altogether, and the players themselves should decide on a draw by evenly distributing the votes. But I’m no longer hoping for the cancellation of abstentions.
And in general, it’s illogical when a minority can determine the outcome of the vote.
But it’s very “fun” when, because of 2-3 abstentions, you can’t eliminate anyone at all. And the game just drags on. But with the same number of inactive players, they will simply eliminate someone, but at least this will maintain the game’s dynamics.
If inactivity is a concern, it’s better to tighten the rules regarding inactive players, up to a limit on the minimum number of messages per day and a ban on voting with abstentions for more than two days in a row.
A limit on the minimum number of posts is nonsense. Posts can be different: some people help explain the rules, some count votes, and some just chat. Should we judge by “usefulness”? You can never determine this accurately, because firstly, the concept itself is subjective, and secondly, in different situations, the same post can be interpreted differently.
a ban on voting with abstentions for more than two days in a row.
This is all not serious. If desired, an abstention (or a draw) can be achieved on any day by voting for players, because two people cannot be eliminated simultaneously.
Отдай свои прошлые сны, В сомненьях себя обрети, В бешеном танце душа кружится! Не думай, что будет потом, Здесь и сейчас мы живем, Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!
ToX
Happy Life
