Skip to content

Posts from Academy of Sciences of Heroesland Auto-translated

5.0 (1 rating)
Open
Should I accept the White Guard’s offer?
30 voters
Single choice Public votes
Sign in to participate in this poll.
Poll results will be visible after you vote or when the poll closes.
User Avatar
#855
Auto-translated
But consciousness will reside in a file. Or in the form of a program; it depends on how it’s organized. And it will remain inactive until you launch it. And even if you do launch it, it won’t be able to do anything that the program doesn’t allow. I imagine it as a program for simulating an environment for you, a digital you, with whom you can do anything in that digital space.
And here, by the way, not so much an ethical issue arises, but a moral one. Because many will say that even though this person is digital, he is still a person and just like a living one, which means he needs to be cherished and not subjected to any torture or simply experiments. Because it’s immoral!
It’s just that now you have to figure out how a person living in a computer program differs from a person living in this world. Can he experience feelings? He certainly can; he is programmed to do so, but, damn, how can I put it? A real person feels things in real life, and there, it turns out, not in real life, until he is transferred into a biological body.

And also, if you put a cool hacker into a computer, he might be able to understand it and even figure out how to influence the computer’s operation, if that’s even theoretically possible.
Stop. If a person is put into some device that converts him into a digital form, he might… He might then live his whole life in paranoia, thinking that the world around him is created by a computer, that he is actually running in a program right now, and that he is not really living. Hmm, interesting, a great plot for a movie or book.
I don’t even know how to solve this problem. You could erase a small piece of memory in which the person was put into the digitization device, but what would that give? If you do that, he won’t even know that he has a copy, and if you tell him about it – now or sometime later – paranoia might still appear. You could come up with some kind of clear identifier that should appear after digitization, but in that case, it could be simulated in the program as well. Damn, what should we do then?
User Avatar
#856
Auto-translated
Well, here it is.
Honestly, my brain isn't working very well in this direction right now.
Любовь и атомное оружие, братья, любовь и атомное оружие.
User Avatar
#857
Auto-translated
Whoa.

Hey guys, what are your thoughts on the origin of life on Earth?
What is there to think about? It seems like so much has already been thought up that it's almost impossible to come up with something new.
As for creationism, even if there is some Creator who made all this, then someone must have created him too. Yeah, there's nothing new to say on this topic. Besides, if he created something as complex as our Universe, then he himself must be even more complex, if we reason using human logic.

Added 1 minute ago
In reply to Imaris
User Avatar
#858
Auto-translated
News about "Russia - 2045". I will be updating regularly.
Imagine a computer program that can collect data from all sorts of sensors scattered around the globe and use it as input for detailed mathematical models covering all aspects of Earth's existence in the smallest detail. People who possess such a program will be able to predict the future, and now researchers from the European Union are going to make all of the above a reality.

Living Earth Simulator is a $1 billion, 10-year project to computer simulate everything around us. Within this computer environment, not only simulating models will be implemented, but also models based on predictive algorithms that will take into account the relationships between various phenomena, objects, and events, the existence of which most people are not even aware of.

How can meteorological changes affect meat production levels? Negative or positive changes in the process of global warming create migrations of wildebeest? If earthquakes occur simultaneously in Belgium and Myanmar, how might this affect something that, at first glance, has nothing to do with it? Such relationships are incredibly complex, but they will be implemented in as much detail as possible within the simulator.

In order to simulate "everything that exists," a huge amount of reliable data is required. The collection of this data will be provided by the Planetary Skin system, being developed as part of the Planetary Nervous System project. The Planetary Skin system will consist of a global network of various sensors, hardware, and software that continuously collect and process huge amounts of information related to various socio-economic, environmental, and technological systems and subsystems. Within the Planetary Skin system, there will be the possibility of interacting with smartphones and tablet computers, so that everyone who wishes can make their personal contribution to this cause.

Work on the creation of the Living Earth Simulator is scheduled to begin in 2013.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения!
И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день



#859
Auto-translated
1 billion dollars won't be enough for this project.
User Avatar
#860
Auto-translated
These swindlers will take your money, spend it on their own needs, and then say, “Sorry, we didn’t have enough funds, the project is closed.”
User Avatar
#861
Auto-translated
Living Earth Simulator is a $1 billion project with a 10-year timeline for computer modeling of everything around us.
Seriously, guys, that's like Sims 4!
But seriously, it's completely unrealistic. Just imagine how much information would need to be processed (let's assume we're taking information directly from sensors and don't need to memorize it all. If we did need to memorize it, it would be even more impossible). Even with quantum computers, it's not feasible.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
User Avatar
#862
Auto-translated
I found it by chance; I don't know how accurate the information is.
Our universe is just a kind of hologram.

God is just a projection of ourselves, and vice versa.

With the "Holometer" device, specialists from the Center for Astrophysical Research at the Fermi Laboratory hope to prove or disprove the crazy hypothesis that a three-dimensional universe, as we know it, does not exist. According to them, our universe is just a kind of hologram.

The theory that the universe is a hologram is based on the recently emerged assumption that space and time in the universe are not continuous.

They supposedly consist of separate parts, points – as if from pixels, which means that it is impossible to infinitely increase the "scale of the image" of the universe, penetrating deeper and deeper into the essence of things.

Upon reaching a certain scale value, the universe turns out to be something like a digital image of very poor quality.

Until recently, this theory was not taken seriously. Only recent studies of black holes have convinced most researchers that there is something to the "holographic" theory.

The fact is that the gradual evaporation of black holes over time, discovered by astronomers, led to an informational paradox – all the information contained about the insides of the hole would disappear in this case. And this contradicts the principle of conservation of information.

But Nobel laureate in physics Gerard 't Hooft proved that all the information contained in a three-dimensional object can be preserved in two-dimensional boundaries that remain after its destruction – just as the image of a three-dimensional object can be placed in a two-dimensional hologram.

The "crazy" idea of universal illusoriness first arose with the physicist from the University of London, David Bohm, a colleague of Albert Einstein, in the mid-20th century. According to his theory, the whole world is arranged in much the same way as a hologram.

As any, however small, section of a hologram contains the entire image of a three-dimensional object, so each existing object is "embedded" in each of its constituent parts.

- It follows that there is no objective reality," Professor Bohm concluded at the time.

But can this illusoriness be "felt" with instruments? It turns out, yes. For several years now, in Germany, at the gravitational telescope built in Hanover, Germany, GEO600, research has been conducted to detect gravitational waves, vibrations of space-time, which are created by supermassive cosmic objects.

However, no waves have been found in these years. One of the reasons is the strange noise in the range from 300 to 1500 Hz, which the detector has been recording for a long time. They greatly interfere with its operation.

The researchers searched in vain for the source of the noise until they were accidentally contacted by the director of the Center for Astrophysical Research at the Fermi Laboratory, Craig Hogan.

He stated that he understood what the problem was. According to him, the holographic principle implies that space-time is not a continuous line, and most likely consists of a set of microzones, grains, a kind of quanta of space-time.

Is the universe an illusion?

- Today, the accuracy of the GEO600 equipment is sufficient to record the vibrations of the vacuum occurring at the boundaries of the quanta of space, those very grains from which, if the holographic principle is correct, the universe consists," explained Professor Hogan.

According to him, GEO600 has just stumbled upon a fundamental limitation of space-time – that very "grain", like the graininess of a magazine photograph. And perceived this obstacle as "noise".

The detector readings currently exactly correspond to the calculations of scientists, and it seems that the scientific world is on the verge of a grand discovery. Experts recall that once, extraneous noises that annoyed researchers at Bell Laboratory during experiments in 1964 already became a harbinger of a global change in the scientific paradigm: this is how relic radiation was discovered, proving the hypothesis of the Big Bang.

The first data obtained with the help of the new device will begin to arrive at the end of this year.
Небо – мольбы не ждёт
Небо – угроз не слышит
Небо – ведёт особый счёт
Небо – тебя найдёт

По вопросам модерации: [email protected]
User Avatar
#863
Auto-translated
Nonsense.
In reply to Imaris
User Avatar
#865
Auto-translated
Imaris
Nonsense.
2x2=10
Небо – мольбы не ждёт
Небо – угроз не слышит
Небо – ведёт особый счёт
Небо – тебя найдёт

По вопросам модерации: [email protected]
User Avatar
#866
Auto-translated
I always place my units strategically.
User Avatar
#867
Auto-translated
Whatever, there aren't any fully developed theories right now, but people are still obsessing over the secrets of the universe.

За всем следят машины благодати и любви.
User Avatar
#868
Auto-translated
Using the "Holometer" device, specialists from the Center for Astrophysical Research at the Fermi Laboratory hope to prove or disprove the outlandish hypothesis that the three-dimensional Universe, as we know it, does not exist. In their opinion, our world is just a kind of hologram.
Let's just say, I suspected! I think, therefore I am, aha-aha.
They are supposedly made up of separate parts, points – as if from pixels, which is why it is impossible to infinitely increase the "image scale" of the Universe, penetrating deeper and deeper into the essence of things.
Upon reaching a certain scale value, the Universe turns out to be something like a very poor-quality digital image.
It doesn't seem particularly relevant to me!
According to him, GEO600 has stumbled upon a fundamental limitation of spacetime – that very "grain," like the graininess of a magazine photograph. And it perceived this obstacle as "noise."
Well, that still needs to be proven. He's looking at gravitational waves, right? Why not assume that this noise comes from dark matter, for example?
And in general, it all seems too anthropocentric. Holograms... But what about probability fields, smeared electrons, and all that? And how is all this related to the "illusory" nature of the world? What a mess
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
User Avatar
#869
Auto-translated
I suggest we discuss an interesting topic that is currently being discussed on the "Russia - 2045" forum. It is called "Preservation of personality when transferred to an electronic medium." Indeed, is it possible to transfer a person's personality to an electronic medium without losing information, and what would it be? What is your opinion, colleagues? Here is a link to the topic: http://2045.ru/forum/87/3230/
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения!
И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день