Posts from Jebus cross template.

Helllight, stop showing off and acting like a big shot if you're nobody... it's still too early for you...
if the goal is just to break ГО on day 1 - that won't be much of a problem... as for VT, you should keep quiet - even with full VT in a normal game, you won't get out on day 1 for quite some time...

Stop showing off and acting tough if you have nothing to say on the topic.

The person is asking for specific help, so own reflections on SoD vs WT and "yeah I reached 115 but what have you achieved" without a corresponding video seem inappropriate to me.

Leader, have you even played Full Warlord Tower? I doubt it...

to have at least 2 swords on skeletons or trolls by the first week, you need to try very, very hard and fight a lot. For Vivs and Angels, it's completely unrealistic because they need a lot of experience to level up, and when the stack is replenished with new recruits, the experience is divided proportionally among everyone.

I won't start another discussion about morale; I'll just say that I prefer it without, because I like it when everything depends on how well or poorly I perform in battles, and not on how morale rolls.

He has 2 swords, but the entire game is geared towards grinding lifeless neutrals on the map for experience points. But when a dragon can't kill a pikeman, it's (censored)-absurd, not a game, IMO.
They came up with some kind of "strategic layer" and play it with a serious face. Any newbie with a maximum experience bonus will take Max-Con on the second week now. And they'll say, "What, I can't do it on 121 without experience, why bother?" :D And everyone is silent, saying we're all trying for the FBB. Whoever levels up their troops better is the best. This is such a perversion of the heroes, that it's impossible to play this game, except maybe for fun. Ugh! Wog is for Wog players.

you should just shut up and stop inserting your unnecessary and uninteresting opinion, not to mention its significance... the video doesn't appeal to me, to put it mildly... those who know me have seen it, and if not, they'll believe me on my word...

I'll share my opinion as well (and I'll say right away to everyone who wants to argue - I played Warlords a lot and for a long time, so I know all its nuances):
1) Those who like Warlords motivate the absence of morale by saying that it allows you to better show whose skill is higher in battle, as only skill affects the course of the battle, and not chance. BUT, in reality, skill is needed to anticipate the possible morale of the AI in the upcoming battle and build the battle on this - and this is more difficult. In Warlords, without morale, battles require much more mindless grinding than skill.
2) Now about experience. It's an interesting thing, especially at the beginning. However, after some time, you realize that it is not needed for heroes' units at all, because battles become simpler and the excitement of battles is lost. In SoD, whether it's the first week or the fourth, if you are fighting a series of weak enemies, you need constant control and attention. In Warlords, thanks to experience, in the second week, almost any weak enemy performs miracles, and skill is not needed here, not to mention later stages. The only plus is that the game speeds up, i.e., it progresses faster than in SoD.
Warlords has many useful things (the same as building a Guildhall, the ability to ban artifacts, etc.), but the 2 points mentioned above are no longer a game of heroes, but only Warlords, and they should not be confused. It is because of these 2 points that I switched back to SoD, the game is much more interesting with morale and without experience.

I agree with every word! :smile12:

Hello. Where can I read the rules for Jebus Cross? Is there a link? My opponent didn't use GO and instead exited on a scroll of Fly; I want to prove that he was wrong.