Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Academy of Sciences of HeroeslandAuto-translated
Ask normal questions, provide normal arguments, or don't interfere with the noble gentlemen's conversation.
What's next? Have you read a lot? Can you give examples of the real benefits of religion on a global scale?
But I'm not claiming that Linux is better or worse than Windows, nor am I expressing any opinions about whether atheism or Christianity is better (or on any related topics). And do you know why? Because I don't have more knowledge than you or Mortulus. The only difference is that you and Morti, without having a wealth of knowledge, assert something from your couch, while I don't assert anything because I don't think it's right to talk about what I don't know.
What makes you think that most people are atheists? Give me some proof.
Okay, you're right, there's no proof. Of course, you're only right about the fact that it's not a fact that there are more atheists than believers.
Sorry, but I'm lazy.
May I ask, sir, what are you doing at the Academy of Sciences of Heroesland? This is a hint, no need to answer.
I understand you, you have the reasoning of a typical newbie manager who doesn't see anything but money.
Ha-ha, I'm just finishing school, and I'm already a manager, and even a newbie one. I see that you are completely unwilling to acknowledge not just someone else's opinion, but even the fact of its existence, naively believing that everyone should think the same way as you.
I see that you are completely unwilling to acknowledge not just a different opinion, but even the very fact of its existence, naively believing that everyone should think the same way as you do.
That's some twisted logic. I explained in my previous post that I perfectly understand what you're trying to tell me. I'm not saying that everyone should think the way I do, but you're the one trying to impose on me the idea that everything revolves around money, and that no one cares about anything else. So, it's you who isn't considering other people's opinions, not me.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения! И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день
I don't want to resort to such a method of argumentation as simply quoting, but in your case, there's no other way.
Imaris
However, I agree with what you said at the beginning of the paragraph. If there weren't people who were willing to push science forward without thinking about money, it would be several centuries behind now. I'm not claiming that everyone in the world thinks only about money.
Ask normal questions, provide normal arguments, or don't interfere with the noble gentlemen's conversation.
Lol. First, you make unsubstantiated claims, and then you talk about arguments. Have you gotten completely fat on your couch? Klov
But I'm not claiming that Linux is better or worse than Windows, nor am I expressing any opinions about whether atheism or Christianity is better (or on any related topics). And do you know why? Because I don't have more knowledge than you or Mortulus. The only difference is that you and Morti, without having a wealth of knowledge, assert something from your couch, while I don't assert anything because I don't think it's right to talk about what I don't know.
Well, you don't think so. But I think that the history course in school and technical university is enough for me to consider religion from a historical point of view. And to consider it in our current time, no special knowledge is needed; it is enough to have at least something resembling erudition. And about Linux, as well as about other operating systems, I can discuss it separately, but I don't think you can tell me anything interesting. Indeed, with such a conversationalist, you can even discuss Christianity. And finally:
I don't assert anything because I don't think it's right to talk about what I don't know.
Servile position. I can't judge this; I'm just a peasant; let the Tsar think, and I'll go plow the land!
Added 1 minute ago Ment
By the way, the last century was cool; there weren't so many things that were messed up.
Two and a half world wars. I don't want that century. Ment
The benefit of religion is great, but it is not the main source of benefit.
Lol. First, you make unsubstantiated claims, and then you start talking about arguments. Have you gotten so lazy on your couch?
Point out where I made an unsubstantiated claim.
You don't consider that. But I believe that the school curriculum and a technical university degree in history are enough for me to consider religion from a historical point of view.
Okay, we have different opinions.
That's a slave-like position. I can't judge this; I'm just a simple peasant. Let the Tsar think, and I'll go plow the land!
Of course, it's much better to lie on the couch and come up with wonderful theories about the structure of the world. And there's absolutely nothing slave-like about it. Let each person reason only about what they understand. According to your terminology, they will be a "slave" in one area and a "king" in another.
At least >And considering that most people are atheists, you should think more carefully about who is the "boor" here.Klov
Okay, we have different opinions.
Well, your opinion has no basis. You probably don't understand something. In the 19th century, you would have been right because most people were uneducated. But now, even a worker at a machine or a cashier at McDonald's knows that the Earth is spherical, Nicholas II was shot, and 2^3=8.
At least >And considering that most people are atheists, you should think more carefully about who here is the "boor."
But I already admitted that I was wrong when I said that.
Well, your opinion has no basis.~
What basis? I believe that for a quality, healthy discussion of any topic, one needs to be well-versed in it. From my point of view, it is not enough to simply be erudite and know the school curriculum; from your point of view, it is enough. We simply have different assessments.
Especially considering how history is taught in schools. Textbooks, neither now nor in the USSR, offer any objectivity. Instead of scientific facts, they are filled with the authors' opinions, which no one needs.
Looks like you've already read all the textbooks, haven't you?
Addressing Klov: Klov, your problem is that you can't see beyond your own nose and always rush headfirst into things. But I think it's just youthful maximalism, nothing more. You just want to prove something to everyone.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения! И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения! И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день
Imaris
