Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Come on, a lot of people at our university are already doing some teaching work on the side, and it doesn't interfere with their computer games at all. And this guy, according to his own words, is only 30.
Actually, the point was the irony of a person who claims to be watching SC2TV while saying things like "You need to play less and focus more on self-improvement!"
Does anyone have a guest key for D3? (If you bought the boxed version, it should be somewhere inside). I really don't want to buy the English version for 2.5k, and I won't make it until June 7th. If someone can provide one, I'd be very grateful! We can settle up in the game. :)
No one really bought the European box for 50 bucks, so there's no chance of finding a guest key here. If you really need one, you can buy it on plat.ru for 3 bucks. That's what I did.
Yes, I'm also very curious: the videos demonstrating the gameplay and the screenshots looked quite good (especially when compared to the frankly outdated graphics of "Diablo" 1 and 2, even for that time)! As for "Blizzard's" policy towards players, which boils down to periodically "milking" them, even those who purchased a license for a considerable sum – that's outrageous! :smile29: :smile18: :smile51: (No words – just emojis!)
Воскресайте, камінні душі, Розчиняйте серця і чоло, Щоб не сказали Про вас грядущі: їх на землі не було… (Василь Симоненко. Люди – прекрасні)
The game is amazing; I have 3 friends who are playing it, and they are all shouting with joy.
The idea of Satir is very relevant; thank you, I'll go and try to get featured on platiru.
How is the game? What are your opinions? I haven't played it yet because my computer can't handle it.
The game is mediocre. The graphics aren't as good as in Diablo 2, but they're still decently outdated, although they look pleasant. Especially with all sorts of little details, like a collapsing roof from a half-ruined house, corpses falling into an abyss, background tunnels in dungeons, and so on. In short, it's modest but tasteful.
The gameplay itself hasn't changed at all. The same chests "on the base," teleports – one in each location, no dialogues or interesting quests. The progression has become even simpler – now you can't level up dexterity, strength, etc. yourself (they grow automatically when you level up), and you can't upgrade skills in multiple stages (but you can insert different runes into them, and there are several runes for each skill, which is essentially the player's only choice).
Also, you get almost no money for selling items, and magic items are melted down into materials for other items that can be crafted by a blacksmith. In short, there's a huge amount of room for hardcore players and min-maxers, but I found it quite boring to play. I played through the demo version (about two hours of gameplay) as a monk and a demon hunter and then stopped.
I almost agree with what you think about this game and Blizzard's policy:
I used to wait for a crack for Diablo 3 for FUN, but now I will wait for it out of principle, because Blizzard has fallen under the "Not a penny to Western corporations" program. There is also another point. I don't mind buying a game for 1,000 rubles. I have limited editions and more expensive ones, but (!) BUT I don't want to give 1000 rubles for a client that should be distributed for free (the Russian version is a must-have). I can buy a key without a disc, that's one thing.
Secondly, I don't want to pay money for a single-player game that runs on a client-server technology. If I, for example, go to the countryside for the weekend, how will I play it there? Perhaps all American residents of rural areas have broadband internet access, but it will not be available in our estate anytime soon. As a result, I will be left without the game, even though I paid for it. This is not right.
Thirdly, I don't want to pay money for the multiplayer part. I don't need it. I am only interested in the single-player mode, so why does Blizzard want me to pay for everything? This is like going to a store to buy a TV, and they also sell you (for extra money) a refrigerator, a washing machine, and a MacBook.
Fourthly, where is the console version?
Now about the hacking. It will be hacked without any doubt. If the database exists, then sooner or later access will be gained to it. We know how to wait. The third Splinter Cell was hacked for three years and finally hacked. With Diablo, it will happen faster, because I am sure that all the crackers in the Western Hemisphere are working on it. Even if the database is not complete, that's not a big deal. Because the single-player mode is only worth playing once. For multiple playthroughs, there is a more user-friendly Torchlight.
P.S. If you want to spend money on an RPG, buy Grimrock, the authors sell it for only 14 dollars, and the money goes directly to the developers.
Complete nonsense and utter rubbish, God forgive me, in the quoted text. Marmot, have you even played it yourself? Or did you form your opinion based on the rantings of some angry whiner? Maybe it would be better to look at the ratings from official gaming publications? They are collected in one place here, for example. Read about record sales of Diablo III. And, finally, the rating from fans on Diablozone. These are people who have played the game. People who are already playing on Inferno, not just reading some obscure articles.
I personally started playing with the first Diablo, then played the second one a lot. From the classic version to Lord of Destruction. I've played for a VERY long time. I'm an old Diablo fan. And now I'm playing Diablo III with great enthusiasm. I immediately bought the European version; I didn't even think about waiting for the Russian version. I am NOT disappointed at all. And this is just the beginning. The game is only two weeks old. It will be refined and polished. And I am looking forward to many years of playing, just like with the second Diablo :)
account (with Diablo 3 linked) Act 1 is available, the character is limited to level 13, at least to get some idea, online play is available with the same limitations)
___ to be honest, I didn't like the game; you can't distribute stats yourself like in WoW; the skill tree is somehow unclear (maybe it's just a first impression) the only good thing is the music at the beginning, from the first Diablo)
I remember when I was still in school, I and a neighbor used to play the first Diablo; he was an archer, I was a mage; we divided the named monsters from which something valuable dropped) we killed Diablo on Nightmare difficulty, but we never reached Hell; then we broke it by using money and stats cheats, and the interest disappeared
Hmm... On the one hand, I don't want to start an argument, but on the other hand, I can't stay silent either. So, here's my opinion – if you want to be offended, that's your right! Gaudin, answer honestly: who pays for the internet in your family? Whose money was used to buy the computer and (possibly) to buy games, movies, and music? If your parents pay for all of this, then there's nothing for me to discuss with you. But if I work and bought the computer myself, and I pay for the internet myself, then I definitely care about what I'm paying for! Using the ratings of critics and journalists, paid for by game developers, as an argument, as well as the ratings of teenage nerds, excuse me, is completely unserious! Because it's obvious that they can only give positive reviews! The same applies to the revenue generated from game sales: this in itself only indicates that the game is of interest to many. But it doesn't say anything about whether the game turned out to be good or bad! Answer me briefly to one simple question: how is "Diablo 3" better than the two previous ones? 1. Graphics. ...?
Воскресайте, камінні душі, Розчиняйте серця і чоло, Щоб не сказали Про вас грядущі: їх на землі не було… (Василь Симоненко. Люди – прекрасні)
Is there anyone who plays on the Phoenix server or on any Russian server in general?
Please share a working bot for leveling up and collecting loot; my gratitude will be boundless within reasonable limits.
(censored...) The client can already be downloaded without purchasing the game, and the key can be bought later. What is all this whining about the need for the internet? Is it 2001 or 2012? Single-player. Playing and replaying Diablo in single-player mode, God judge those people. Complaining about spending a thousand rubles once every twelve years. And how much do single-player games cost now? Some corporations, cracks, in general, a loser's quote. However, the game itself wasn't that great.
Morning, I wanted to ask you the same question as Gaudin, but I checked your profile, and the answer became obvious. Of course, you know best: who is a fool and who is not! ;)
Воскресайте, камінні душі, Розчиняйте серця і чоло, Щоб не сказали Про вас грядущі: їх на землі не було… (Василь Симоненко. Люди – прекрасні)
Kilgor
