Skip to content
User Avatar
#2796
Auto-translated
Hmm... On the one hand, I don't want to start an argument, but on the other hand, I can't stay silent either. So, here's my opinion – if you want to be offended, that's your right!
Gaudin, answer honestly: who pays for the internet in your family? Whose money was used to buy the computer and (possibly) to buy games, movies, and music? If your parents pay for all of this, then there's nothing for me to discuss with you.
But if I work and bought the computer myself, and I pay for the internet myself, then I definitely care about what I'm paying for!
Using the ratings of critics and journalists, paid for by game developers, as an argument, as well as the ratings of teenage nerds, excuse me, is completely unserious! Because it's obvious that they can only give positive reviews! The same applies to the revenue generated from game sales: this in itself only indicates that the game is of interest to many. But it doesn't say anything about whether the game turned out to be good or bad!
Answer me briefly to one simple question: how is "Diablo 3" better than the two previous ones?
1. Graphics.
...?
Воскресайте, камінні душі, Розчиняйте серця і чоло, Щоб не сказали Про вас грядущі: їх на землі не було…
(Василь Симоненко. Люди – прекрасні)