Heroes 6 - Discussion — General

a.k

14 years ago

Auto-translated

I_N

this is the price you pay for Ubilauncher remembering you.

If my memory serves me right, Lord Mortulus had the same problem, in some mission, and I think the game crashed while playing as Necropolis.
Lord Mortulus, did the new patch help you?

Саня Изи

14 years ago

Auto-translated

Unfortunately, no.

It seems like there was a third mission where an orc appears with a decent army. The first time, it was fine, but when I replayed it, it started crashing.

Rasles

14 years ago

Auto-translated

I play as the Haven faction. I really like the game, both the storyline and the strategic aspect. And a game like this will never get boring. I really liked the game's graphics. I've played all the parts of this game, although 3.5 is my favorite, and when I play with friends, it's the one we always choose. Although even Heroes can get tiresome, in between playing sessions, I play cool mini-games like that, just to take a break from the game)))

In reply to Дронов Илья

Supric

14 years ago

Auto-translated

Dronov Ilya

Besides, this system with fortresses and mines, did it really appeal to anyone who played Heroes III or Heroes V?

This system has its own advantages and disadvantages. It is neither better nor worse. And it is no less playable and interesting.

Garnet

14 years ago

Auto-translated

I also think it's a weak unit. And there's nothing interesting about it. It's interesting in Disciples, yes. But in Heroes, it's a miss.

Adagio

14 years ago

Auto-translated

Linking resource sources and creature dwellings to towns and forts, the ability to hire all units in one camp, the improved portal mechanism, building conversion, the castle architecture system, and the hero skill tree – in my opinion, all these innovations significantly simplify the gameplay, which is not a good thing. Although some of them I still like. But if I were a developer of "Heroes 7," I would only partially borrow the fundamentally reworked ideas of linking and the skill tree, and I would discard the rest. I would implement a change of time of day, seasons (and, accordingly, weather), grid-based movement on the battlefield, racial individualism, and much more, focusing not on quantity but on quality. But that will not happen.

Garnet

14 years ago

Auto-translated

Moderated: OFF-TOPIC in the message

And what about Heroes? You summon a powerful monster to get a gold mine, but it turns out that you are the one who got it. Because within a couple of days' journey from here, an enemy castle rises. And you did the enemy a favor by giving him this wonderful mine for FREE. And I'm annoyed by such a situation when you see something, but you can't get it. What's the point of having these mines on the adventure map then? Well, they could have built them inside the castles – it's all the same in the end.

In reply to Garnet

нонстоп

14 years ago

Auto-translated

Garnet, I mean that the example is not a good one. It doesn't resemble the system from *Disciples* at all. There, everything was decided by the wizards, whom you could summon and dismiss as needed, but here,

Moderated: USE OF OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE in the message

who does what.

Adagio

14 years ago

Auto-translated

Gentlemen, let's place our bets on the release date of patch 1.4. :smile04:

In reply to Adagio

Rainer

14 years ago

Auto-translated

Adagio

Gentlemen, let's place our bets on the release date of patch 1.4. :smile04:

No earlier than June 23rd.

Adagio

14 years ago

Auto-translated

No earlier than June 23rd...

That's quite pessimistic... And why a specific date all of a sudden...? Although, no, it's correct. When making predictions, they specify a certain value. :smile51:

I think they'll release it in the second half of May.

Garnet

14 years ago

Auto-translated

August 15 -_-

In reply to Garnet

Supric

14 years ago

Auto-translated

Garnet

What about in Heroes? I took out a tough monster to get a gold mine, but it turned out that I did them a favor. Because within a couple of days' journey from here, there's an enemy castle. And you've done the enemy a favor by giving them this wonderful mine for free. And I'm annoyed by this situation, when you see something but can't get it. What's the point of having these mines on the adventure map then? They might as well have built them inside the castles – it's the same thing in the end.

If the fort is neutral, the mine will be yours and will work without problems. But if you run to the territory controlled by an opponent and remove the guard from the gold mine, it doesn't make sense, because in all previous Heroes games, the opponent would almost immediately recapture it with a secondary hero from the nearest town... so in this regard, nothing has changed.

Ment

14 years ago

Auto-translated

Moderated: OFF-TOPIC in the message

And in general, it seems strange that a neutral mine is not automatically captured, but an enemy mine is. It's just very strange. They could at least make it so that the mine doesn't fall out of the owner's control if he has captured it at least once (!).

Adagio

14 years ago

Auto-translated

It seems strange that a neutral mine isn't automatically captured, while an enemy mine is. It's just very strange.

The implication is that while a mine is neutral, no one is working there, but as soon as it's captured, continuous work begins for the player who owns the control point. I don't think that's strange.

Added after 14 minutes
This is something like a holding system, where, figuratively speaking, a city or fortress is the holding company, and resource sources are subsidiary companies. According to this scheme, capturing the parent organization automatically leads to the subordination of the previously controlled subsidiaries.

Reading content in

Interface language

Posts from Heroes 6 - Discussion

Statistics

Library

Users Online 9 users 1307 guests

Today's Visitors 32