Posts from Heroes 6 - Discussion

Everything remains at the same level. Maybe they'll fix it in patch 1.7, and most likely with a new expansion, if one is even released.

It's a shame, because the replacements completely ruin the atmosphere.

Ubisoft assures that the city screens will be included in a patch, not an add-on.

Ubisoft assures that city screens will be included in a patch, not an add-on.

By the way, yes. We can also recall that the patches for the original "Heroes of Might and Magic V", which brought the balance to the proper level, were released after the add-on.

Nival itself refused to continue collaborating with Ubisoft. They simply couldn't give them this project.

I have a question. How do you take screenshots in Heroes 6?

I have a question. How do you take screenshots in Heroes 6?

The classic PrintScreen key works for me. If it doesn't work, try using Fraps.

I downloaded patch 1.3. The game started running worse. The loader appears five minutes after launching the game. Yesterday, it also took half an hour to exit the game. They still haven't added a "Remember me" button to the loader. It's annoying.

I also downloaded the patch, but I didn't notice anything like that. The "Remember" function didn't work before, and I don't think it will work now either :). The loading screen appears and disappears as usual.

Also, I noticed that ranked games have been added.

Decided to replay the campaigns, and after the patch, a bug appeared that wasn't there before. In the second mission for Sanctuary, Irina doesn't attack the fortress; she just approaches it, exchanges dialogue, and the battle doesn't start. Also, an old bug has returned, which was previously fixed – equipped Dynasty weapons, even after being replaced with another weapon, continue to affect the hero's units in battle. I first used the Griffin Sword, and then the Arachne, so even with the Arachne equipped, when hovering over a unit, the stats still showed the Griffin Sword as well. A strange patch.

This is what Yubi was talking about in the interview. They didn't fully test the patch changes after all.

Perhaps Limbic was mistakenly given the wrong source files, and they patched version 1.1 instead of 1.2.

Well, that’s just amazing.

Perhaps Limbic was given the wrong source files by mistake, and they patched version 1.1 instead of 1.2.

Is that even possible? Although, I wouldn't be surprised by anything at this point.

Who knows, maybe it’s possible. Because bringing back old bugs into the game is theoretically possible, but things like the Dynasty weapon… I can’t even imagine.

I think that patches reintroduce old bugs not because the source code was incorrect, but rather due to the game's code itself. On foreign forums, people often write about its complexity, intricacy, and, most disturbingly, instability. If you rewrite one line, three others might lose their meaning. It's a real utopia. We could already observe this during the beta testing phase.

Are their programmers incompetent?