1. Well, it's very unlikely that you're better than us.
2. And who stopped you from not targeting Zubr? He would have won then.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
1. Well, it's very unlikely that you're better than us.
2. And who stopped you from not targeting Zubr? He would have won then.
On the last day, I was punished for, umm, "being too toxic, we won't let his team win."
2. And who stopped you from not messing with Zubr? He would have won then.
You were executed because:
a) It would have been a non-negotiable situation, and I would have used protection, meaning you could only attack peaceful players – which wouldn't be beneficial for them.
b) As far as I remember, you have a double vote.
As far as I remember, you had a double voice.
a) It would be a non-aggression pact, and I would use protection, meaning you could only attack peaceful players – it wouldn't be beneficial for them.
b) As far as I remember, you have a double vote.
Well, they didn't choose you; why should they have? Did you play better?
Tox had it.
We never failed with the night defense; we left a larger number of people for the end, and I was only revealed at the very end, although this can, of course, be justified by the fact that I didn't write much. But Tox was identified only by elimination, even though he wrote a lot.
Because we were playing for our victory, not for Zubr's victory.
I could have blocked you forever; it's interesting how many nights would have been wasted before we both decided to shoot? I think not many.
Nope.
What does "better" have to do with it when I say that the main reason for the choice was "olololo," so we wouldn't let Tox's team win?
I could block you forever; I wonder how many nights would pass in vain before we both decided to shoot? I think, not many.
1. You never failed? Is this a joke? Why does the log show that on the first night, you went to kill Naver Leengard, who had immunity on the first night? Was this a mistake by Коша?