Skip to content

Posts from Speed and aggression.

5.0 (1 rating)
In reply to VanjaM
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
VanjaM
25.03.2012 VanjaM (blue, Inferno, Xiron, Marius) draw Ihtiandr (red, Tower, Ayna, Neela) Kite 217
Confirmed. A nub loss. We stopped playing when it was already 4 am for me, so the endgame was played very poorly. I took 4 Dragon Utopia in the treasure zone, all stats were higher, but towards the end, I left Neela in the Castle to replenish mana without titan armor, and the opponent's castle was just two steps away (out of stupidity, I didn't send a pawn there for scouting). I handled the battle terribly, resulting in ГГ. I had all the trump cards, but one small detail decided everything. Thanks for the game!
14 years ago
Auto-translated
With Vatey, we’re on a save, and we need to finish it today.
In reply to Gaudin
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Gaudin
Hmm... What a fighter... No comment...
What's the point of wasting time on a tournament?
P.S. From the very beginning, I voted for the double-elimination bracket and was against the Swiss system.
Good luck to everyone in the tournament!
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Last night, we started with the match against Straife, but we didn't have time to finish it before the draw. Gaudin suggested postponing the game, which suits us perfectly. We'll play this match and the 4th round within a week.
In reply to RomarioGrom
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
RomarioGrom
03/25/2012 RomarioGrom (Flax, Moner, Nagash) def Sevan_80 (Rampart, Elshar, Elshar) Speed 1 (l-u) 117
It seems like the start was decent, but it didn't quite work out from the beginning, even though I killed the Necromancer on day 111. I managed to finish off two more opponents before the end of the week. I have almost no army left, but I have two well-developed mages and only built Psionicists; it didn't work out with the auto-build.
Thank you for the game!
Confirmed, I couldn't find a stone mine, and I couldn't build a Castle or Knights on day 117, so I decided not to waste time. Thank you for the game.
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
We started a game with Leonidosik, and agreed to finish it the night before the draw, but the opponent didn't show up. It would be good to postpone the game so that everything can be resolved without those losses.
In reply to PlayHeroes_HP
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
PlayHeroes_HP
I confirm, I'm withdrawing from the tournament because I've already lost in it.
"All or nothing" is a primitive approach to tournament play. Ambition is, of course, a driving force for success, but you need to be aware of your capabilities.
And what about respect for other tournament participants?
Respect for the website? Respect for yourself?
You can set a goal not to win the tournament, but, for example, to achieve something within your capabilities:
1. Make it into the top five (7, 10...) strongest players.
2. Win 1-2 matches against an opponent of equal or even greater strength.
3. Score 50% or more of the possible points.
4. Study and practice new templates for future games, especially since you came up with half of them, and many agreed to play them out of respect for your work. And instead of playing and improving your templates, you're doing this... It's sad.
14 years ago
Auto-translated
03/25/2012 dom2(random) def ariputra(random) Speed 1 (m-u) 112

I don't remember who started first, but I remember that my opponent chose their faction and I got a decent starting position. After saving the game, my opponent refused to continue and gave me the win. Thanks for the game.
In reply to dom2
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
For the organizers: it's worth noting that players who sign up for tournaments but don't play at all, or withdraw due to laziness rather than real-life problems or lack of time, should simply not be accepted into the tournaments. This saves time for all other players and prevents arguments in the forums.
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Dogbas
Well said. Bravo!!!
CryptoNight
That's understandable :)
But it doesn't apply to PlayHeroes_HP yet :)
He has already realized his haste.
This "hot Finnish guy" messaged me on ICQ.
He said he got carried away and promised to withdraw his statement in the thread, but he's probably still embarrassed.
In short, PlayHeroes_HP is still participating in the tournament.

So, let's start the draw!!!
I'll post the results in a few minutes :)
In reply to Dogbas
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Dogbas
03/25/12 Dogbas (red, random, Castle, Valeska, Valeska) drew Fellshut (blue, random, Dungeon, Shakti, Shakti) Speed 1 (l - u) 111
The blue player didn't want to give up the turn, so we agreed to a draw.

It's actually frustrating. We had some good strategies going, and then Shakti showed up... maybe we'll get lucky and play again sometime. Good luck in the tournament!
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
The draw for round 4 has been completed. The results are in the header.
Player standings after round 3 are in the second post of the thread.
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
as many are already used to, I first take a break, then return again; this is no exception, it just happens when the motivation and interest, etc., are lost, and naturally, I made that decision. I found another motivation: to stay alive until the end of the tournament –))
P.S. Isn't it after 3 losses that players are eliminated in the Swiss system?
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Javdet (blue Rampart, Mephala, Mephala) def Satyr (red Dungeon, Sephinroth, Gervulf) Kite 117

It was a pretty good game, except for the hero with dwarves.

Satyr lost and declined the rematch. The analysis showed a total advantage for him in terms of angels. I could only have won if I had managed to grab the Utopia with Earth, if I had lived long enough to get to it.

Thanks for the game.
User Avatar
14 years ago
Auto-translated
Yikes... What am I even doing here...
117 And there's already a total advantage in angels.... Dragon Utopia...
Mamma mia....:smile11: :smile15:

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: recijeb