Skip to content

Posts from "Copetolius-2012" Tournament Auto-translated

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
In reply to RiMpel2
User Avatar
#31
Auto-translated
RiMpel2
Were there any rules during the single-player game? No. Let's embrace anarchy and go for it!

And once again, I'm all for it: :smile13:

Well, what's wrong with that?
Let's organize a tournament on Anarchy :)
Ihtiandr
I might organize a tournament later (I've always wanted to do that).
The ball is in your court :)

Or do you specifically want to build a Capitol? :)
In reply to Gaudin
User Avatar
#32
Auto-translated
Gaudin
I'm in again:

What's wrong with that?
Let's set up a game on Anarchy... :)


If you really want to play without rules and with a fast turn limit, then welcome to GameRanger. You can easily find an opponent there who takes 1-2 minutes per turn and plays without any rules.
Сейчас балуюсь этим https://vcmi.eu/download/
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
In reply to RiMpel2
User Avatar
#33
Auto-translated
Ihtiandr
You probably misunderstood the rules. If both players build a Capitol by turn 122, or on the same day, the game continues instead of ending in a draw.
What's the point? The idea of the tournament isn't about combat, but about building. It would be fairer to determine the winner based on the amount of gold remaining after building the Capitol. Even a draw would be recorded more accurately. IMHO.
RiMpel2
Were there any rules during single-player mode? No. Let's embrace anarchy and go for it!
Among the anarchy templates, there's a Jebus-like build. It will ruin the idea of the tournament.
In reply to Lider1
User Avatar
#34
Auto-translated
Lider1
If you really want to play without rules, with a fast turn limit, then welcome to GameRanger, where you can easily find an opponent who takes 1-2 minutes per turn and plays without rules.
No... Tournaments and GameRanger are different things. :)
I've played in GameRanger several times.
There is absolute irresponsibility there.
An opponent can leave at any moment, without finishing the game.
In general, I got the impression that everything there is completely unserious. If the opponent is not doing well, or he is simply bored, he leaves without saying goodbye, and that's it.
Tournaments are different.
I don't think there will be such a careless attitude towards the opponent among people who communicate on the same forum.
The attitude towards the game is also completely different.

P.S. I don't know if I managed to say what I wanted. For example, I find it much more interesting to play in a tournament, even if I lose to everyone. But I fight with all my might, feeling responsible for the game. And in GameRanger, everyone treats each other as if they are playing against a computer. IMHO, of course.
User Avatar
#35
Auto-translated
Hello everyone! If we want to get creative, we could try 2sm4d(3) XL-U with maximum water and 200% speed, with 2-minute turns. We don't need to set a limit on the number of heroes, as it becomes unrealistic to play with more than 4-5 heroes later on. For those who like a challenge, we could try 1-minute turns. My suggestion, as a newcomer. Let's base it on a football system. First, a playoff within groups of 6 players, with matches played between three players, with the winner receiving 3 points and the loser receiving 1 or 0 points. The player who doesn't participate receives 2 or 1 point (the number of games, points, etc., can be discussed; the main thing is not to drag out the game). Then, a knockout stage, but not with three players, but with two: it can be a single match, or a "home and away" format, or best of three (if it's 1:1). I haven't participated in official tournaments, only in small groups of three. There are two good templates (in my opinion): http://files.mail.ru/T4DBL9, http://files.mail.ru/VGRQQ6. If anyone is interested, please write... you can email me at [email protected]