Auto-translated
I don't quite understand what kind of templates these are. I'll sign up anyway :D
484800548
Не бійся коли ти один, бійся коли ти нуль.
484800548
484800548
Сатир
Posts from Speed and aggression.
Сатир
CryptoNight
Auto-translated
I didn't quite understand what kind of templates these are. I'll sign up :D
484800548
I didn't understand anything, but I signed up :D. Awesome :cool:
Javdet
Auto-translated
I didn't quite understand what kind of templates these are. I'll sign up :D
484800548
Даже если вас съели - у вас два выхода:smile19:
Зима 2011-12.
Зима 2011-12.
Сатир
Auto-translated
We'll figure it out as we go. The main thing is that it's not Jebus and the time limit isn't 10 minutes.
Не бійся коли ти один, бійся коли ти нуль.
484800548
484800548
PReDS
Auto-translated
We'll figure it out as we go along. The main thing is that it's not Jebus and the time limit isn't 10 minutes.
Kilgor
Auto-translated
I will register on ICQ 245338291.
PlayHeroes_HP
Auto-translated
It seems like you're being put on reserve...
I changed speed from 1m to u for average monsters so that it would be possible to break through any blocks in a treasure zone.
/topic/at/542935/
I changed speed from 1m to u for average monsters so that it would be possible to break through any blocks in a treasure zone.
/topic/at/542935/
Пока!
Dogbas
Auto-translated
Since the Swiss system received quick negative feedback and no votes in its defense.
1. The number of participants can be any.
2. The possibility to add participants after the start.
3. All players participate from the beginning to the end of the tournament (in my opinion, this is the main plus, because in "double elimination," interest and attention decrease towards the end of the tournament, and the ending becomes drawn out and few people are interested, as "Double Elimination Chamber" showed well).
4. Everyone earns "their" points, and in addition to the first rounds, a player meets with an opponent of approximately equal strength; the weakest players do not reach the top places but gain experience and the opportunity to compete with participants of their level.
5. The possibility to set a temporary result for an unfinished match without technical defeats and without delaying the next round.
6. Fewer rounds (6 instead of 10).
Scorpiona
Auto-translated
Please, list the advantages of the "Swiss" system:
1. The number of participants can be any.
2. It is possible to add participants after the start.
3. All players participate from the beginning to the end of the tournament (in my opinion, this is the main advantage, because in "double elimination," attention and interest decrease towards the end of the tournament, and the ending becomes drawn out and few people are interested, as "Double Elimination Chamber" showed well).
4. Everyone scores "their" own points; also, except for the first rounds, a player meets an opponent of approximately equal strength. The weaker players will not reach the top places, but they gain experience and the opportunity to compete with participants of their level.
5. It is possible to set a temporary result for an unfinished match without technical defeats and without delaying the deadlines for the next round.
6. Fewer rounds (6 instead of 10).
For example, I also believe that playing 6 rounds out of 6 is much more enjoyable than playing only 2 games out of 10 and then just being an observer. Personally, I always feel like I don't get enough games in a tournament (P.S. because I get eliminated early).
Several tournaments have already been held on VKontakte using this system; I don't understand what you don't like:smile50:
Well, divide the players into 2 groups, as is usually done (to prevent strong players from meeting in the first round), and then everything will be fine!
One player with the maximum number of points reaches the final:smile49:, and everyone is happy to have fully participated in all rounds:smile54:.
Dirty_Player
Auto-translated
and everyone is happy because they fully participated in all rounds:smile54:
.
Ihtiandr
Auto-translated
I really wanted to participate, but unfortunately, I didn't have time. But in general, you could hold qualifying matches between the last players who signed up.
ICQ: 494048169
Не любят многие порнуху, а я... А я люблю порнуху! © А.С. Пушкин
Twitch Channel
Crypt Videos
Не любят многие порнуху, а я... А я люблю порнуху! © А.С. Пушкин
Twitch Channel
Crypt Videos
KiNB
Auto-translated
I'm also in favor of using the Swiss system! Moreover, this will allow us to register all those who want to participate in the tournament.
Убив один раз, становишься негодяем, тысячу раз - героем.
d-neez
Auto-translated
Tried generating updated maps:
Speed1 (m-u) looks great on medium-level treasure monsters; this template will definitely be quick to play now, thanks for the changes.
Kite is now exactly as it should be and plays great.
However, Cross continues to generate 100500 of the same thing in treasure locations.
Gaudin
Auto-translated
Attention
I ask all those who submitted applications to participate, including wassermann, Satir, Kilgor, and Ihtiandr, as well as other potential participants,
to take part in the VOTING
I sent a link to the voting topic to everyone's ICQ.
Except for three participants who did not provide their ICQ - these are Captain, theShevanesian, and RomarioGrom (please provide your contact information :))
In general, everyone has been warned about the voting. :)
I wanted to add a few words about the Swiss system after consulting with knowledgeable people :)
We will hold 6 rounds
The participant with the most points wins
The distribution of places among participants who have scored the same number of points is carried out according to the following additional criteria:
1) Head-to-head result
2) Sonneborn-Berger coefficient
The Berger coefficient of a chess tournament participant consists of the sum of all the scores of opponents whom this participant won against, plus half the sum of the scores of opponents that this participant drew against. The idea behind applying the coefficient: of two participants equal in the number of points, the one who won by defeating stronger opponents who scored more points is stronger. Therefore, the participant with the higher Berger coefficient is awarded a higher final place in the tournament.
A win against a participant with zero points does not contribute to the Berger coefficient.
If we still have participants with identical results here, then an extra game.
Approximately like this :)
Javdet
Auto-translated
Tried generating updated maps:
Speed1 (m-u) looks great on medium-level treasure monsters; this template will definitely be quick to play now, thanks for the changes.
Kite is now perfect and plays great.
However, Cross continues to generate 100500 of the same thing in the treasure rooms.
Thank you. I accidentally uploaded the previous version. I have fixed it.
Даже если вас съели - у вас два выхода:smile19:
Зима 2011-12.
Зима 2011-12.
Statistics
Welcome our newest member:
Emil